traction control revisited

traction control revisited

Author
Discussion

Turbobird1

Original Poster:

443 posts

148 months

Tuesday 9th October 2012
quotequote all
redvictor said:
So,we need to ask the tech commitee what they need to know then.It's pretty simple if that is what you're asking. From there a plan is drawn up to find out how the tech guys can check every ECU that is used.
clap

redvictor

3,152 posts

237 months

Tuesday 9th October 2012
quotequote all
prostang said:
I thought graham had switched to motec ?
LOL..i doubt it. Graham will probably laugh when he sees your question.

Turbobird1

Original Poster:

443 posts

148 months

Tuesday 9th October 2012
quotequote all
and as you say there is only two ecu right now so it cant be that hard

yes if its on the car you need to be able to PROVE its not in use with a quick look
when i used it in testing with the blower car when i was in competition the Davis technology's box was unplugged and in the trailer so there was no dispute,
thats not possible with the ecu if you leave it in the trailer you wont get far,

so something quick simple that would satisfy other RACERS wether their turbo, blower, or n2o,

this will all be nicey nicey until someone runs stupid quick on a track no one else can get down, trust me iv been there and seen it first hand, the st stiring the rumors the accusations and from that day on everyone will be watching everyone else so the tech guys need to be able to check and give the right answer

Edited by Turbobird1 on Tuesday 9th October 20:58

trackday addict

503 posts

209 months

Tuesday 9th October 2012
quotequote all
Could be 3 as we are looking at maybe using Syvecs in the new car.
Potentially a good deal to be done and local support on the ground to assist if required.
Either way have no issue showing logging etc.

Just need to sell the existing car now asap or we won't be racing till 2014 anyway !! smile

Turbobird1

Original Poster:

443 posts

148 months

Tuesday 9th October 2012
quotequote all
how come your selling that car?? Jim who built it told me that was a pro mod spec chassis and as he builds the quickest fastest turbo pro mods in the world id have thought it was a good starting point...what axle does it have? i thought its a mw 11"
is it turnkey only or will you break it?

trackday addict

503 posts

209 months

Tuesday 9th October 2012
quotequote all
Selling as we bought the unused sister car to it last year Graham also built by Jim (never used).
Current car is ready to sell as a turnkey package that should run 6.6 or less off the trailer and an ideal car for Comp Elim, Top Doorslammer or S Pro or Jap Series.

New car will have a more upto date rear end, new and tidier wiring and built with 2013 Pro Mod parts in mind.

Turbobird1

Original Poster:

443 posts

148 months

Tuesday 9th October 2012
quotequote all
but the new car is the other zed right? ok i just thought you were building another car,
i remember when he built those,


trackday addict

503 posts

209 months

Tuesday 9th October 2012
quotequote all
Yep other Zed, be nice to do our own thing on this one as we had to work around issues with the previous car and change a lot of things to get it sorted ie/ engine fires, wiring issues.

At least we start from scratch to a degree with this one.

Vixpy1

42,624 posts

264 months

Tuesday 9th October 2012
quotequote all
trackday addict said:
Could be 3 as we are looking at maybe using Syvecs in the new car.
Good man hehe


the penny will drop when you look at my profile

Turbobird1

Original Poster:

443 posts

148 months

Wednesday 10th October 2012
quotequote all
rules say that an approved ecu must not monitor drive shaft or wheel speed and must be closed loop, so for a first and easy step how about removing any trans/drive-shaft/axle sensors that are not solely connected to a logging system ?
then the scrutineer could have a peek under the car ect,
if using tc for testing or other classes it takes minutes to put your sensor ring back on
the rules actually say that the wiring/sensors should be easily identifiable to the scrutineer,
so dosent that rule put the onus on us to help them identifying what were doing???
its in the rule book so id say its mandatory that we do that..

Edited by Turbobird1 on Wednesday 10th October 08:59

Tet

1,196 posts

204 months

Wednesday 10th October 2012
quotequote all
redvictor said:
If you look at that in the cold hard light of day,then you're saying that anyone with a turbo car at some point will cheat if you don't do something about it?
I don't want to put words into Graham's mouth, but I suspect what he's getting at is this: As soon as the turbo cars start consistently running the numbers in Europe (which let's face it, they will in the not too distant future), then you can guarantee that certain of the blower teams will suspect foul play, probably quite vocally. Ideally, you'd want to be in a position where the tech guys can turn around at that point and say "no, we've checked, they're not using traction control". So even though we don't believe that anyone is using traction control right now, we need to think about it now so that the tech guys have a chance to get up to speed for when the st hits the fan. Which it will. Otherwise, you can be sure that the blower teams will push for a spec ECU whether you like it or not. Better to fix them problem yourselves now than to have a fix imposed on you later, one that you may not like.

MartynJones

45 posts

145 months

Wednesday 10th October 2012
quotequote all
Just to throw a further spanner into the works, it's notjust ECU controlled cars.

Anyone running an MSD Power Grid (either with or without a ProMag, and NHRA legal for ProMod, Top Alcohol and Sportsman), can get a 7761 Advance RPM Control Module to plug into it which uses slew rate to control RPM.

What's worse, the 7761 is small enough to fit into a pocket so unless someone's at the big end of the track to observe, it wouldn't neccessarily still be on the car by the time it gets back to scrutineering. And if you don't run the Micro SD card in the Power Grid, or record the ignition in a Racepak, there won't be any evidence that it was ever connected.....

Turbobird1

Original Poster:

443 posts

148 months

Wednesday 10th October 2012
quotequote all
Tet said:
I don't want to put words into Graham's mouth, but I suspect what he's getting at is this: As soon as the turbo cars start consistently running the numbers in Europe (which let's face it, they will in the not too distant future), then you can guarantee that certain of the blower teams will suspect foul play, probably quite vocally. Ideally, you'd want to be in a position where the tech guys can turn around at that point and say "no, we've checked, they're not using traction control". So even though we don't believe that anyone is using traction control right now, we need to think about it now so that the tech guys have a chance to get up to speed for when the st hits the fan. Which it will. Otherwise, you can be sure that the blower teams will push for a spec ECU whether you like it or not. Better to fix them problem yourselves now than to have a fix imposed on you later, one that you may not like.
Jesus h Christ at last ......
isnt that exactly what iv been saying.....
i know my spellings st and my grammar leaves something to be desired but was it that unintelligible

trackday addict

503 posts

209 months

Wednesday 10th October 2012
quotequote all
Well why didn't you just say that smile

(Only playing) !!


Justin Stage

52 posts

152 months

Wednesday 10th October 2012
quotequote all
Turbobird1 said:
Tet said:
I don't want to put words into Graham's mouth, but I suspect what he's getting at is this: As soon as the turbo cars start consistently running the numbers in Europe (which let's face it, they will in the not too distant future), then you can guarantee that certain of the blower teams will suspect foul play, probably quite vocally. Ideally, you'd want to be in a position where the tech guys can turn around at that point and say "no, we've checked, they're not using traction control". So even though we don't believe that anyone is using traction control right now, we need to think about it now so that the tech guys have a chance to get up to speed for when the st hits the fan. Which it will. Otherwise, you can be sure that the blower teams will push for a spec ECU whether you like it or not. Better to fix them problem yourselves now than to have a fix imposed on you later, one that you may not like.
Jesus h Christ at last ......
isnt that exactly what iv been saying.....
i know my spellings st and my grammar leaves something to be desired but was it that unintelligible
No - Tet did! and yes, at first it was but after 5 pages and over 100 posts on the subject at least Tet understood what you were getting at! laugh

Benni

3,515 posts

211 months

Wednesday 10th October 2012
quotequote all
Off topic (which I find very interesting, thanks for the tech insights) :

On one of my late pit strolls I ended up in Jaska Salakari´s pit where he was working on his blown Super Twin

which is running sequentially injected Nitro (unique in the world ? )

controlled by a self-developed and self-built ECU which is also controlling the ignition and clutch system timers.

This was about two years ago when he was mostly blowing up engines.

He told me that he was aiming for low 6s, and if he ever gets quick, he is awaiting protests

accusing him of using tc because nobody knows what is happening in his stacked circuit boards.

Now that he is getting quicker, faster and -a litte- more constant,

we´ll see if that will happen, and how techies deal with a totally unique self-built unit.

I would find it sad it such ingenuity would be out-ruled because I like that kind of "left-field" bikes.

Now, back to cars.....




Burndown

732 posts

166 months

Thursday 11th October 2012
quotequote all
Benni said:
Off topic (which I find very interesting, thanks for the tech insights) :

On one of my late pit strolls I ended up in Jaska Salakari´s pit where he was working on his blown Super Twin

which is running sequentially injected Nitro (unique in the world ? )

controlled by a self-developed and self-built ECU which is also controlling the ignition and clutch system timers.

This was about two years ago when he was mostly blowing up engines.

He told me that he was aiming for low 6s, and if he ever gets quick, he is awaiting protests

accusing him of using tc because nobody knows what is happening in his stacked circuit boards.

Now that he is getting quicker, faster and -a litte- more constant,

we´ll see if that will happen, and how techies deal with a totally unique self-built unit.

I would find it sad it such ingenuity would be out-ruled because I like that kind of "left-field" bikes.

Now, back to cars.....



That's a very good point.

If a class allows somebody to compete with them whilst knowing there may be an issue with their car/bike you should say something straight away rather than wait till they beat you, and then roll out the sour grapes.

dorrisdormouse

127 posts

151 months

Thursday 11th October 2012
quotequote all
I sold my MSD Digital Programmable 7 ignition box earlier this year to a nitrous pro mod team for their spares box. I know that it has the ability to do slew rate limiting. Cant say that they are using it, but im guessing this is the sort of thing your talking about?

lucky777devil

48 posts

171 months

Friday 12th October 2012
quotequote all
I haven't been on here for ages. I don't have an opinion on TC really , but as can be seen , it is available on any car not just ECU / Turbo cars

Mark13

403 posts

178 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
Wayne, what did you break at the National Finals? There looked like an amazing amount of torque involved.