IR35 Position, Confused

Author
Discussion

R500POP

Original Poster:

8,782 posts

211 months

Thursday 1st December 2011
quotequote all
As of 16th Dec I'm going to be starting work for Bloodhound SSC. They don't have any employees, they only 'employ' contractors.

I'm considering a few options, amongst them are going Ltd company, one inside IR35, one outside IR35.

I'd take home IRO 10% more if I worked outside IR35, but I worry about if I'd get investigated for it.

Bloodhound provide office space, PC, software etc, but do not pay holiday, sickness, pension etc, as I said, the only way to work for them is "self employed". What is the likelyhood of an IR35 investigation?

Eric Mc

122,053 posts

266 months

Thursday 1st December 2011
quotequote all
YHM

worsy

5,811 posts

176 months

Thursday 1st December 2011
quotequote all
For IR35 the relevant questions surround Control, Substitution and Mutual obligation. The fact that they provide an office, pc and software is relevant though not critical.

Will you report formally your tasks to a manager who then monitors your performance?
Do you have the right to substitute yourself with another similarly skilled candidate?
Do you expect to be paid when there is no work, or are you expected to take work given to you?

These are the types of questions which establish whether you are truly in business or a disguised employee.

As for liklihood of an investaigation. Who knows, seemingly it can be random.

bigandclever

13,795 posts

239 months

Thursday 1st December 2011
quotequote all
How is this thread different to the one you did a couple of weeks ago?

R500POP

Original Poster:

8,782 posts

211 months

Thursday 1st December 2011
quotequote all
bigandclever said:
How is this thread different to the one you did a couple of weeks ago?
Because this one is soley about IR35.

bigandclever

13,795 posts

239 months

Thursday 1st December 2011
quotequote all
I'll try to be a bit more helpful then smile

If you're that worried, do you have the option to go through a brolly in which case IR35 becomes a moot point? If you go through your own Limited then you can work as if you are caught by IR35 and pay taxes appropriately, or you can work as if you aren't caught (and by that I mean do contracting properly). If you go down that route you should (a) ensure the contract is IR35 friendly (get it reviewed by the likes of Bauer & Cottrell) (b) ensure your working practices are IR35 friendly and (c) get some investigation insurance.

In terms of likelihood of investigation? You're more likely to win the lottery than receive an IR35 investigation. There have been 322 in the last 5 years (HMRC's own figures, released under FOI in the last couple of months). What triggers an investigation is kind of outlined here

robmlufc

5,229 posts

187 months

Friday 2nd December 2011
quotequote all
worsy said:
Do you have the right to substitute yourself with another similarly skilled candidate?
I worked for 6 years as a contracter on aircraft using a Ltd company. Because I couldnt substitute myself with another candidate, if I was sick for example, then I came outside of IR35. Get a decent accountant who knows about contracting and IR35, keep all your receipts and you will be fine. Its slightly daunting at first but once you get the hang of it you will be quids in. Add the misses as your secretary and treat her to a decent AGM once a year wink

Out of the 1000s of guys I have worked with who have used Ltd I know one person who was investigated. If really in doubt use a Umbrella company as mentioned by someone else. I used Danbro when I first started Connying, helpful bunch and the timesheet/expenses system is very user friendly.

Edited by robmlufc on Friday 2nd December 09:23


Edited by robmlufc on Friday 2nd December 09:23

R500POP

Original Poster:

8,782 posts

211 months

Monday 5th December 2011
quotequote all
Thanks for the advice guys, it looks like I should be OK, the guys work outside IR35, & I have an IR35 checked contract, HAPPY DAYS.

Eric Mc

122,053 posts

266 months

Monday 5th December 2011
quotequote all
R500POP said:
Thanks for the advice guys, it looks like I should be OK, the guys work outside IR35, & I have an IR35 checked contract, HAPPY DAYS.
The contract is not enough.

R500POP

Original Poster:

8,782 posts

211 months

Monday 5th December 2011
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
The contract is not enough.
I'm hoping that along with PCG membership that I'll be OK.

worsy

5,811 posts

176 months

Monday 5th December 2011
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
The contract is not enough.
+1 Working practice is more relevant

Eric Mc

122,053 posts

266 months

Monday 5th December 2011
quotequote all
R500POP said:
Eric Mc said:
The contract is not enough.
I'm hoping that along with PCG membership that I'll be OK.
As the next post says, the key thing is what actually happens in the work environment.

The clauses in the contract MUST be adhered to in the way the work is actually carried out on a day to day basis.
And the clauses have to be practical. If you have a "substitution" clause in place, the clause MUST be capable of being utilised. Merely having it in the contract is not enough.

worsy

5,811 posts

176 months

Monday 5th December 2011
quotequote all
And not forgetting it works both ways, a non compliant IR35 contract can be over ruled if working practices show outside.