Login | Register
SearchMy Stuff
My ProfileMy PreferencesMy Mates RSS Feed
1
3
Reply to Topic
Author Discussion

chrisxr2

839 posts

63 months

[news] 
Saturday 4th August 2012 quote quote all
Certainly, jaguars, Harrier Gr9s, Tornado F3's awacs, spent two years on the mighty one on GR9's and about a year on the strike attack operational evaluation unit, where we had a a jag, a few harriers and a tornado F3 where we tested all the new kit that came out, and a year and a half at colt split between working in the sheds and as a bay whaller. Spent the rest of my time at Waddo as a bay whaller. I wasan avionics mech on the old mech tech system and was also on the 3rd original SAC tech course where you did the same 18 month course as the JT's but without the Rank. In my day (1996 onwards) you did 9 months technical training before you where let anywhere near anything, then 18 months or so on a squadron or in a bay then a further 18 months of technical training before you came out as a JT or in my case SAC tech. Then you averaged three years of good assessments minimum before you got a sniff of your tapes. Sadly the training and old ways of teaching to fault find right down to component leve are now long gone. Still a good career, but would i join up now?? Daft thing is everyone that has been in says that, but new joiners have never known any different so a bit of a daft thing that people say. I will say my 10 years as an aircraft techie has helped a lot out in civvy street and i am not sure how i lived in the airforce on less than half the money i am payed now. The crack and some of the stuff you do in the mob that seems normal really isn't, and its only when you leave you realise that.



ben_h100 said:
Perhaps you can provide an insight into what you worked on then?

chrisxr2

839 posts

63 months

[news] 
Saturday 4th August 2012 quote quote all
Certainly, jaguars, Harrier Gr9s, Tornado F3's awacs, spent two years on the mighty one on GR9's and about a year on the strike attack operational evaluation unit, where we had a a jag, a few harriers and a tornado F3 where we tested all the new kit that came out, and a year and a half at colt split between working in the sheds and as a bay whaller. Spent the rest of my time at Waddo as a bay whaller. I wasan avionics mech on the old mech tech system and was also on the 3rd original SAC tech course where you did the same 18 month course as the JT's but without the Rank. In my day (1996 onwards) you did 9 months technical training before you where let anywhere near anything, then 18 months or so on a squadron or in a bay then a further 18 months of technical training before you came out as a JT or in my case SAC tech. Then you averaged three years of good assessments minimum before you got a sniff of your tapes. Sadly the training and old ways of teaching to fault find right down to component leve are now long gone. Still a good career, but would i join up now?? Daft thing is everyone that has been in says that, but new joiners have never known any different so a bit of a daft thing that people say. I will say my 10 years as an aircraft techie has helped a lot out in civvy street and i am not sure how i lived in the airforce on less than half the money i am payed now. The crack and some of the stuff you do in the mob that seems normal really isn't, and its only when you leave you realise that.



ben_h100 said:
Perhaps you can provide an insight into what you worked on then?

PaulG40

1,730 posts

94 months

[news] 
Saturday 4th August 2012 quote quote all
chrisxr2 said:
and about a year on the strike attack operational evaluation unit
Fellow FJWOEU'er here! biggrin. Do you remember the Horse's Head, Si Price? wink

ben_h100

992 posts

48 months

[news] 
Sunday 5th August 2012 quote quote all
chrisxr2 said:
Certainly, jaguars, Harrier Gr9s, Tornado F3's awacs, spent two years on the mighty one on GR9's and about a year on the strike attack operational evaluation unit, where we had a a jag, a few harriers and a tornado F3 where we tested all the new kit that came out, and a year and a half at colt split between working in the sheds and as a bay whaller. Spent the rest of my time at Waddo as a bay whaller. I wasan avionics mech on the old mech tech system and was also on the 3rd original SAC tech course where you did the same 18 month course as the JT's but without the Rank. In my day (1996 onwards) you did 9 months technical training before you where let anywhere near anything, then 18 months or so on a squadron or in a bay then a further 18 months of technical training before you came out as a JT or in my case SAC tech. Then you averaged three years of good assessments minimum before you got a sniff of your tapes. Sadly the training and old ways of teaching to fault find right down to component leve are now long gone. Still a good career, but would i join up now?? Daft thing is everyone that has been in says that, but new joiners have never known any different so a bit of a daft thing that people say. I will say my 10 years as an aircraft techie has helped a lot out in civvy street and i am not sure how i lived in the airforce on less than half the money i am payed now. The crack and some of the stuff you do in the mob that seems normal really isn't, and its only when you leave you realise that.



ben_h100 said:
Perhaps you can provide an insight into what you worked on then?
Fair one, fast jets mainly then. The lack of going down to component level is happening in our trade as well; very few posts where you can get stuck in on the kit.

PaulG40

1,730 posts

94 months

[news] 
Sunday 5th August 2012 quote quote all
ben_h100 said:
Fair one, fast jets mainly then. The lack of going down to component level is happening in our trade as well; very few posts where you can get stuck in on the kit.
An unfortunate sign of the times I'm afraid! frown Damn that 5W! Lol.
Advertisement

CrabDan

568 posts

12 months

[news] 
Sunday 5th August 2012 quote quote all
My advice would be to think of what you want from a job, rather than just picking the trade that you think will get you closest to the aircraft. As with any job, it doesn't take long before the novelty or "wow" factor of working with "cool stuff" wears off. My trade in the RAF has very little to do with aircraft at all, but I get a good mental stretch from my work, I'm in the higher payband and the promotion prospects in my trade are alot better than in that of many others, up to a point at least.

By the way, I met a Flight Ops Assistant on selection at Cranwell (I applied for a few jobs in the RAF, the first of which was Air Traffic Control but I binned it off when I realised it wasn't what I really wanted to do) and from what he told me (and to echo previous statements on this thread) it is boring-as-hell.

Edited by CrabDan on Sunday 5th August 17:39


Edited by CrabDan on Sunday 5th August 17:41

Dixie68

3,081 posts

56 months

[news] 
Sunday 5th August 2012 quote quote all
chrisxr2 said:
Jesus h christ, every trade allegedly supports air power. Corporate, rubbish. The aircraft techies do the ral work everyone else could be replaced by a civvy. Chris avionics tech 10 years now offshore.

ben_h100 said:
Yes, we are involved with the Typhoon to such an extent as that the aircraft cannot start a mission without the system we support. As far as I'm aware (I haven't been posted on a sqn yet - maybe in the future), there are dedicated teams of our trade on the Typhoon sqns that maintain the system and go with the aircraft.

As for the UAVs, we are involved heavily as well.

Also involved with other aircraft to a lesser extent such as Sentinel and C130.

If you are posted into the right job, then you can expect to have civilian qualifications galore; Cisco, fibre optics, Microsoft, web design, etc.

There's the whole Navaid side of the trade as well, for example all the radars, ILS, beacons and radios on the airfield are maintained by us.

There are also many niche jobs that fall into other areas, for example the sneaky beaky stuff. You may undergo DV clearance which can be very useful in civilian life.

Granted we are not working directly on the aircraft, but we are one of the trades (apart from aircraft techies obviously!) that directly support air power.

The trade is very broad so there is bound to be something that floats your boat.

As for pay, well as an ICT Tech, as long as you have no hiccups during training and complete the Advanced Apprenticeship (you will complete it, the RAF ensure you do), then after two and a half years you will be on at least £25k.
I've got to say, Ben, that I agree with Chris here. Your trade has interesting aspects to it without blowing smoke up the OPs backside about your proximity to aircraft. I was an AV Cpl and I worked on Nimrods, Tonkas, Hercs and Sentry AWACs for 15 years and the only time I saw TG4 anywhere near them was when they were picking up or dropping off tapes as part of CATHS. Any computers on aircraft get fixed by Avionics, even the software writing/testing on the AWACs is an AV role - I should know as that was my last duty at RAF Waddington before I left.

OP - the Flight Ops Asst trade is basically an office job; would that really interest you? If it does then go for it. If you're not really sure what you want to do then the following may help:
  1. Sit down, think about what you are interested in, write it down. As an example I ended up as Avionics because I listed my interests as; computers, electronics, working on aircraft and NOT office work.
  2. Learn off by heart what you've written down, visit the AFCO and tell them what you're interested in. Don't take the list with you and read from it or they'll think you are dense! wink
  3. Ask for pamphlets on the trades the guys in the AFCO suggest - don't confine yourself to one trade at this point.
  4. Take these pamphlets home to read.
  5. Take the time to read the info they give you and THEN make your decision.
As an aside, my girlfriend, (who I met when we were both in the RAF), had as her last duty the job of Sergeant careers advisor in an AFCO. They are very approachable and are there to help you so don't be afraid of just popping in and chatting to them.

Good luck, but remember don't make any snap decisions you may live to regret.

CrabDan

568 posts

12 months

[news] 
Sunday 5th August 2012 quote quote all
"You may undergo DV clearance which can be very useful in civilian life."

Some companies will hire you soley on the basis that you are DV cleared, even if you're sh*t at the job, just because the process of developed vetting is so expensive.

PaulG40

1,730 posts

94 months

[news] 
Sunday 5th August 2012 quote quote all
Definitely! A DV clearance is a massive bonus on any CV!


VTECBOY - where's your nearest AFCO and Airbase? It would be very worthwhile to arrange a visit to a station and visit the various sections to actually see what the fuss is about!

Edit - scratch that, I see your local to Edinburgh? Arrange a careers visit to RAF Leuchars and the shiny Buffoons! If not, arrange with the AfCO to come up to Lossie and I'll show you round! smile

Edited by PaulG40 on Sunday 5th August 22:25

ben_h100

992 posts

48 months

[news] 
Sunday 5th August 2012 quote quote all
Dixie68 said:
I've got to say, Ben, that I agree with Chris here. Your trade has interesting aspects to it without blowing smoke up the OPs backside about your proximity to aircraft. I was an AV Cpl and I worked on Nimrods, Tonkas, Hercs and Sentry AWACs for 15 years and the only time I saw TG4 anywhere near them was when they were picking up or dropping off tapes as part of CATHS. Any computers on aircraft get fixed by Avionics, even the software writing/testing on the AWACs is an AV role - I should know as that was my last duty at RAF Waddington before I left.

OP - the Flight Ops Asst trade is basically an office job; would that really interest you? If it does then go for it. If you're not really sure what you want to do then the following may help:
  1. Sit down, think about what you are interested in, write it down. As an example I ended up as Avionics because I listed my interests as; computers, electronics, working on aircraft and NOT office work.
  2. Learn off by heart what you've written down, visit the AFCO and tell them what you're interested in. Don't take the list with you and read from it or they'll think you are dense! wink
  3. Ask for pamphlets on the trades the guys in the AFCO suggest - don't confine yourself to one trade at this point.
  4. Take these pamphlets home to read.
  5. Take the time to read the info they give you and THEN make your decision.
As an aside, my girlfriend, (who I met when we were both in the RAF), had as her last duty the job of Sergeant careers advisor in an AFCO. They are very approachable and are there to help you so don't be afraid of just popping in and chatting to them.

Good luck, but remember don't make any snap decisions you may live to regret.
Sure, I accept that in almost all of the posts in our trade, we will never go near the aircraft. However, there are some posts that do, the Typhoon GSS being an example. I should emphasise to the OP that a posting to that side of things is never guaranteed, no matter how much you want it.

Good advice on the AFCO side of things; there are plenty of people in the RAF who aren't super keen about their primary job.

PaulG40

1,730 posts

94 months

[news] 
Monday 6th August 2012 quote quote all
ben_h100 said:
Sure, I accept that in almost all of the posts in our trade, we will never go near the aircraft. However, there are some posts that do, the Typhoon GSS being an example.
Near it, but not touch it as you will not have be auth'd. I've certainly never seen any non a/c trades be allowed to do anything on the typhoon. That was my experience at Coningsby. Willing to be proved wrong though if Leuchars is different. smile

PaulG40

1,730 posts

94 months

[news] 
Monday 6th August 2012 quote quote all
I agree with CrabDan though, choose a trade based on what you have interests in rather than because you've heard there's an interesting side to it but the chance of actually doing that is slim to none in your career.

I had an long standing interest in aircraft, the RAF and engineering and had done engineering at college and university (never finished uni) so I was heading to be a techie in the RAF. I loved the practical side of it, I actually wanted to be a Engo originally but I went upto Leuchars while on a trip with Cadets and did work experience alongside a Jengo. My god it was boring, all paperwork etc, hardly ever near the aircraft unless they are QA'ing them do I chose to go through the ranks as I wanted the practical hands on aircraft experience not a desk job.

Now though, after 11 1/2 yrs, I'm doing a HND to become hopefully an Engineering Officer as now I've got that practical aircraft side put out of the way I want to challenge myself in a different area and I respect the work Engos do now than I did before I joined up. Also to prove to myself I could do it and become a officer. I won't let it change me though, I'll still be a cool officer, lol. wink

My only annoyance is that with the pension system changing, I've got to baggy my 12yr point, and start a fresh with a new 18yr Officer pension. This is still 2yrs down the, so will have done 14yrs by then.


So having said all that, choose what you want to do, what interests you. Be a copper, MT driver, admin, chef, steward, FOA, GEF techie, photog, ICT, C4I geek, stacker or a/c techie. You will enjoy the experience whatever you choose.

Edited by PaulG40 on Monday 6th August 09:15


Edited by PaulG40 on Monday 6th August 09:16

robmlufc

2,742 posts

55 months

[news] 
Monday 6th August 2012 quote quote all
In terms of job satisfaction you cant beat aircraft trades! Yet to find something more satisfying than seeing a Harrier hover over the airfield on its flight test after you have had it stripped down to a shell and rebuilt it. Major service C/O satis!

PaulG40

1,730 posts

94 months

[news] 
Monday 6th August 2012 quote quote all
robmlufc said:
In terms of job satisfaction you cant beat aircraft trades! Yet to find something more satisfying than seeing a Harrier hover over the airfield on its flight test after you have had it stripped down to a shell and rebuilt it. Major service C/O satis!
We used to have a nightmare with the bathtubs on engine changes. Wing off, engine out, new engine in, wing back on err wing doesn't fit, errr.
On one, we had the wing not fitting from an engine change, and then one of the mechs found some fatigue cracking in the bathtub. The jet was in a 1000 parts, just shoved in tri-wall boxes and forgotten about for a year. Then the endgame date was announced and the boss then ordered that we will be flying all 3 Harriers out, so we had a huge push to put the jigsaw of pieces back together and get it serviceable. To see it fly out with the other too back to Cottesmore was very moving after sooo much blood, sweat and tears getting it back together when no one thought it would ever fly again.

Dixie68

3,081 posts

56 months

[news] 
Monday 6th August 2012 quote quote all
robmlufc said:
In terms of job satisfaction you cant beat aircraft trades! Yet to find something more satisfying than seeing a Harrier hover over the airfield on its flight test after you have had it stripped down to a shell and rebuilt it. Major service C/O satis!
I agree; walking out to the flight line to carry out a servicing, fix a fault or even just do a see-in or see-off on a crisp winter morning was always the best part of the job for me. The day I got my missile and software Q's was the worst in my life as I knew that once I got my tapes the odds were I'd be off the line and into an office or bomb-dump (not a good place to be as a Fairy). Sure enough I got my tapes and ended up sitting at a desk frown . That was the beginning of the end for me and I started to plot my future career in civvy strasse.
Still it was good while it lasted on the squadrons, I saw most of the world on detachment, some good, some bad, some bloody scary! smile

robmlufc

2,742 posts

55 months

[news] 
Monday 6th August 2012 quote quote all
PaulG40 said:
We used to have a nightmare with the bathtubs on engine changes. Wing off, engine out, new engine in, wing back on err wing doesn't fit, errr.
On one, we had the wing not fitting from an engine change, and then one of the mechs found some fatigue cracking in the bathtub. The jet was in a 1000 parts, just shoved in tri-wall boxes and forgotten about for a year. Then the endgame date was announced and the boss then ordered that we will be flying all 3 Harriers out, so we had a huge push to put the jigsaw of pieces back together and get it serviceable. To see it fly out with the other too back to Cottesmore was very moving after sooo much blood, sweat and tears getting it back together when no one thought it would ever fly again.
Very very similar, we recieved a GR9 at Cottesmore that had been sat at Coningsby for about 3 years due to a wing mount and bath tub being butchered. The whole thing arrived as a box of bits, nothing labelled up, had been robbed to death, no 731s on anything. We all wrote it off as a dead jet. 8 months(?!) later it was a flyer just in time to be stripped down and sent to the desert in the States!

Also, as an airframe/engine bloke you will learn all kinds of mechanical systems, its a very varied job. Fuel systems, high and low pressure air, oxygen, hydraulics, metal bashing, air conditioning, all kinds of pumps and motors. I'm sure Elec/AV are similar in that sense, the experience you gain is very much sought after if/when you leave.

PaulG40

1,730 posts

94 months

[news] 
Monday 6th August 2012 quote quote all
robmlufc said:
Very very similar, we recieved a GR9 at Cottesmore that had been sat at Coningsby for about 3 years due to a wing mount and bath tub being butchered. The whole thing arrived as a box of bits, nothing labelled up, had been robbed to death, no 731s on anything. We all wrote it off as a dead jet. 8 months(?!) later it was a flyer just in time to be stripped down and sent to the desert in the States!
ZA328? We robbed it, BAE butchered it, lol.

robmlufc

2,742 posts

55 months

[news] 
Monday 6th August 2012 quote quote all
PaulG40 said:
ZA328? We robbed it, BAE butchered it, lol.
Yes 328 that's the one, fun and games that was! smile

mph1977

4,806 posts

37 months

[news] 
Monday 6th August 2012 quote quote all
PaulG40 said:
<snip>
Btw, you don't join as a JNCO (Cpl and above), You earn it!!!!
the only people who 'join' as Cpls are newly qualified Nurses who trained on civvie street and join the forces within a couple of years of qualifying...

PaulG40

1,730 posts

94 months

[news] 
Tuesday 7th August 2012 quote quote all
mph1977 said:
the only people who 'join' as Cpls are newly qualified Nurses who trained on civvie street and join the forces within a couple of years of qualifying...
They are also on a completely different pay scale to the rest of us non commissioned.
1
3
Reply to Topic