Login | Register
SearchMy Stuff
My ProfileMy PreferencesMy Mates RSS Feed
1
3
Reply to Topic
Author Discussion

PHOENIXUK

Original Poster:

1,678 posts

70 months

[news] 
Monday 6th August 2012 quote quote all
Pothole said:
hy do you want to fk up his life? He has left you now, what you are advocating smacks of revenge. Just confirm dates and move on.
Revenge, not at all Pothole, simply asked for a reference by a company and would like to have answered there questions truthfully.

Thanks for all the other answers, it is a shame that one has to be so fearfull of telling the truth even when it can be backed up by an employees records, however as stated several times here not worth it.



PHOENIXUK

Original Poster:

1,678 posts

70 months

[news] 
Monday 6th August 2012 quote quote all
burriana said:
ahem smile Or will the wage not cover my petrol even in comedy Citroen?
Sorry Al, not a sales vacancy so no opportunity to maintain your Vigin Atlantic Platinum card, it was a stores employee.

magpie215

1,900 posts

58 months

[news] 
Monday 6th August 2012 quote quote all
Pothole said:
PHOENIXUK said:
magpie215 said:
How long was he employed with you?
18 months.

Thanks for replys pretty much knew the answer, heyho employer beware...

BUT, one question asks, based on our knowledge now would we re-employ, can anyone see any issue with stating our opinion to that?
Why do you want to fk up his life? He has left you now, what you are advocating smacks of revenge. Just confirm dates and move on.
18 months you saw fit to give him employment even with his negatives??

Now he wants to move on and better himself but it inconveniences you a little so may as well throw all the negatives into the reference even though you have been happy to carry on with him for 18 months MMMmmmmmmm.

UnderTheRadar

451 posts

42 months

[news] 
Monday 6th August 2012 quote quote all
A colleauge of mine did an MBA which included a module in employment law. He was shocked. Pretty much as everyone said above, saying anything more than basic facts leaves you open to legal action. If you go beyond that, i.e. his manager said he failed specific duties, then you better have the emails to back that up but it's not worth the risk. We have been asked twice for references for someone we know is chronically unreliable and has been "let go" within a few months from every job she has had. We just reply saying that we are unable to provide a reference without saying anything more. I'm sure they get the message.

burriana

15,801 posts

123 months

[news] 
Monday 6th August 2012 quote quote all
magpie215 said:
18 months you saw fit to give him employment even with his negatives??

Now he wants to move on and better himself but it inconveniences you a little so may as well throw all the negatives into the reference even though you have been happy to carry on with him for 18 months MMMmmmmmmm.
What an unnecessary post.

All the OP said was that he was not the greatest of staff. You cannot sack someone for this reason alone, even if they happen to be the most miserable, bad mannered, unfriendly person you have ever met.

If you could, then he might well have been shown the door some time ago. What is wrong in wanting to be able to give a true, unbiased reference? (Hypothetical question).

Advertisement

magpie215

1,900 posts

58 months

[news] 
Monday 6th August 2012 quote quote all
burriana said:
magpie215 said:
18 months you saw fit to give him employment even with his negatives??

Now he wants to move on and better himself but it inconveniences you a little so may as well throw all the negatives into the reference even though you have been happy to carry on with him for 18 months MMMmmmmmmm.
What an unnecessary post.
No...just my take on it...that is all

PHOENIXUK

Original Poster:

1,678 posts

70 months

[news] 
Monday 6th August 2012 quote quote all
burriana said:
What an unnecessary post.

All the OP said was that he was not the greatest of staff. You cannot sack someone for this reason alone, even if they happen to be the most miserable, bad mannered, unfriendly person you have ever met.

If you could, then he might well have been shown the door some time ago. What is wrong in wanting to be able to give a true, unbiased reference? (Hypothetical question).
Cheers Al, there is always one..

h0b0

1,447 posts

65 months

[news] 
Tuesday 7th August 2012 quote quote all
Most companies where I live won't give good references let alone bad ones because of fear of being sued. As a result I never follow up on references because they are worthless. The best information I can get is dates of employment. At my company if we are asked for a reference it gets sent to HR.

burriana

15,801 posts

123 months

[news] 
Tuesday 7th August 2012 quote quote all
PHOENIXUK said:
Sorry Al, not a sales vacancy so no opportunity to maintain your Vigin Atlantic Platinum card, it was a stores employee.
Rich, I have never worked in Sales. But at the moment (as you said a couple of years ago) I'd be happy to drive a white van if it offsets some of the damage to my savings smile

Hence the offer to help you out for a period if you were stuck but, I'm guessing the hourly rate will be swallowed up in fuel to get there!

Pommygranite

4,158 posts

85 months

[news] 
Tuesday 7th August 2012 quote quote all
What's his name? Make a typo on purpose but sufficiently rude enough to clarify your thoughts but easy enough to claim innocence.

Rude-boy

15,509 posts

102 months

[news] 
Tuesday 7th August 2012 quote quote all
h0b0 said:
Most companies where I live won't give good references let alone bad ones because of fear of being sued. As a result I never follow up on references because they are worthless. The best information I can get is dates of employment. At my company if we are asked for a reference it gets sent to HR.
Part the problem. Give a glowing reference and you can be sued if the employee isn’t up to their new job and the other firm tries to have a pop at your “She is the greatest woman that ever worked here” reference.

Give a stty one and you can be sued by the employee if they can get their hands on it (easy enough if you know what bits and say and quote and have any tenacity).

Don’t forget it isn’t just a question of having said anything wrong. Defending any action against someone who can get the last couple of £££ of Legal Aid or has someone who will bank roll them or if will act in person is costly as to time and legal fees and distress. This is even if you are 100% watertight. We there is a (gap) in your armour then you could also be looking at the resultant damages and costs. Never forget either that even if you win you are unlikely to get a costs award or if you do manage that by some miracle then it is more than likely that you are trying to extract those costs fro a man of straw.

ETA I can't believe that that word is censored!


Edited by Rude-boy on Tuesday 7th August 11:55

sunoco69

1,047 posts

34 months

[news] 
Tuesday 7th August 2012 quote quote all
burriana said:
What an unnecessary post.

All the OP said was that he was not the greatest of staff. You cannot sack someone for this reason alone, even if they happen to be the most miserable, bad mannered, unfriendly person you have ever met.

If you could, then he might well have been shown the door some time ago. What is wrong in wanting to be able to give a true, unbiased reference? (Hypothetical question).
Well said.

matchmaker

3,252 posts

69 months

[news] 
Tuesday 7th August 2012 quote quote all
A number of years ago I had to provide a reference for a member of staff. Her new employer provided a proforma for me to complete. She was a generally st worker but I didn't put anything negative about her. I was also asked to note how much sick leave she'd had in the past year so I give the amount - well into double figures.

She got the job, but after a few weeks I got a call from her new employers HR department along the lines of "did she really have that much time off sick?"

Next thing I knew she was on the phone swearing vengeance on me as she'd been sacked for throwing one sickie too many!

iphonedyou

2,504 posts

26 months

[news] 
Tuesday 7th August 2012 quote quote all
I never knew was censored. Crazy.

Blue62

1,391 posts

21 months

[news] 
Tuesday 7th August 2012 quote quote all
PHOENIXUK said:
18 months.

Thanks for replys pretty much knew the answer, heyho employer beware...

BUT, one question asks, based on our knowledge now would we re-employ, can anyone see any issue with stating our opinion to that?


I would simply state that company policy is not to re-employ and leave it there. You obviously bear this person a bit of a grudge, but it's just not worth the aggro, you'll get over it in time. Never, ever give a reference over the phone either, I know someone who was quite badly caught out and paid the price.

Johnnytheboy

7,076 posts

55 months

[news] 
Tuesday 7th August 2012 quote quote all
This is another great example of an increasingly litigious society rendering something pointless.

What's the point of a reference that doesn't say anything?

Rude-boy

15,509 posts

102 months

[news] 
Tuesday 7th August 2012 quote quote all
iphonedyou said:
I never knew was censored. Crazy.
Worse is that I never gave it a second thought when I typed it, only when I saw the censored did I recall the other meaning. Sad state of affairs.

Rude-boy

15,509 posts

102 months

[news] 
Tuesday 7th August 2012 quote quote all
Johnnytheboy said:
This is another great example of an increasingly litigious society rendering something pointless.

What's the point of a reference that doesn't say anything?
No point at all other than to confirm that they were empolyed by that Co. when they said they were, which is a hurdle a few fall at...


sleep envy

59,273 posts

118 months

[news] 
Tuesday 7th August 2012 quote quote all
PHOENIXUK said:
A memeber of staff recently gave us notice to leave, they are not the greatest of staff, always out for himself and never a giver so not to bothered to see the back of him but due to the 'holiday time of year' he has left us in a hole. Just received a 'private and confidential' letter/questionaire from a local council asking for an employer reference, I want to answer the questions honestly some positive but mostly negative, are you actually allowed to be negative these days??
Sounds like he's perfectly suited to being a civil servant, just be glad he's gone rather than create problems for yourself further up the road.

h0b0

1,447 posts

65 months

[news] 
Tuesday 7th August 2012 quote quote all
As employers we should be allowed to say "we will not miss him". There is nothing libelous in that statement but it says everything a potential employer needs to know.
1
3
Reply to Topic