What's your idea of a good salary?

What's your idea of a good salary?

Poll: What's your idea of a good salary?

Total Members Polled: 1067

£10k+ per annum: 0%
£20k+ per annum: 1%
£30k+ per annum: 12%
£40k+ per annum: 20%
£50k+ per annum: 17%
£60k+ per annum: 12%
£70k+ per annum: 6%
£80k+ per annum: 7%
£90k+ per annum: 2%
£100k+ per annum: 22%
Author
Discussion

NerveAgent

3,314 posts

220 months

Tuesday 9th December 2014
quotequote all
illmonkey said:
That's great, but if you're able to save that much, don't you ever just want to spend some of it? why not save £1500 and have sky sports and that slightly nicer car.
Everyone has different priorities though, not everyone wants shiny things, as people who like shiny things seem to believe.

Why have sky sports when that payment could take a year off my mortgage? Add it all up and I've taken 15 years off it? Suddenly I'm not even going to need to work full time as I have hardly any outgoings by the time I'm 35?

liner33

10,690 posts

202 months

Tuesday 9th December 2014
quotequote all
NerveAgent said:
Because I could have taken on a similar sized mortgage but chose not to. Ie you dont have to spend what you earn.
If you dont spend what you earn who else will ?

NerveAgent

3,314 posts

220 months

Tuesday 9th December 2014
quotequote all
liner33 said:
If you dont spend what you earn who else will ?
It doesn't "go off" ya know?

vescaegg

25,543 posts

167 months

Tuesday 9th December 2014
quotequote all
"Spend what you have left after saving. Dont save what you have left after spending."

This is how I have always lived and IMO its a good frame of mind to work with.

okgo

38,033 posts

198 months

Tuesday 9th December 2014
quotequote all
illmonkey said:
That's great, but if you're able to save that much, don't you ever just want to spend some of it? why not save £1500 and have sky sports and that slightly nicer car.
I don't actually, no.

There again I am not unrealistic and do build in enough fun money for going out into the bit I don't save, otherwise yes, I'd be dipping in!

OF course being where we are in the SE we need every penny as when we buy a house next year its going to be 750k so saving now will help then. Also I'll be well used to the mortgage payment given how much I don't spend now!

vescaegg

25,543 posts

167 months

Tuesday 9th December 2014
quotequote all
okgo said:
illmonkey said:
That's great, but if you're able to save that much, don't you ever just want to spend some of it? why not save £1500 and have sky sports and that slightly nicer car.
I don't actually, no.

There again I am not unrealistic and do build in enough fun money for going out into the bit I don't save, otherwise yes, I'd be dipping in!

OF course being where we are in the SE we need every penny as when we buy a house next year its going to be 750k so saving now will help then. Also I'll be well used to the mortgage payment given how much I don't spend now!
You sound like me.

Our spending hasnt really increased at all with our income. That now means we save approx 60% of our take home salaries each month.

As said, were in the SE too so most goes into property....

PorkInsider

5,888 posts

141 months

Tuesday 9th December 2014
quotequote all
Good to see it's not only me who doesn't agree with the "your spending increases in line with your salary" theory.



Edited by PorkInsider on Tuesday 9th December 22:46

AudiSport

1,458 posts

216 months

Tuesday 9th December 2014
quotequote all
My Aunty and Uncle both earned very good money for most of their working lives. They saved every penny they could, living well within their means in an effort to enjoy retirement traveling the world together. They both became millionaires when they retired and cashed in their options etc.

6-months later my Aunty was dead.

It's all about balance. Spend some, waist some and save some. I'm by no means an expert, but this is something I do ponder over regularly myself.

djc206

12,350 posts

125 months

Wednesday 10th December 2014
quotequote all
AudiSport said:
My Aunty and Uncle both earned very good money for most of their working lives. They saved every penny they could, living well within their means in an effort to enjoy retirement traveling the world together. They both became millionaires when they retired and cashed in their options etc.

6-months later my Aunty was dead.

It's all about balance. Spend some, waist some and save some. I'm by no means an expert, but this is something I do ponder over regularly myself.
Definitely. I'm 28 and I spend pretty much everything I earn at the moment, I'm not prepared to miser away my money when I'm in the prime of my life. I'm not going to save to travel in my retirement I'm going to travel now whilst my health is there and I'm fully mobile. Saving heavily for a future that's not guaranteed to me is bonkers.

I'm not saying saving is silly of course it's not but there are people so obsessed with saving that they're actually not living, you only get one shot at life folks.

I work with a guy who saves religiously, he's a millionaire, a few times over I should imagine. Why? He's so used to saving he'll never spend it so all he's achieved is an estate to leave to next of kin that don't exist.

liner33

10,690 posts

202 months

Wednesday 10th December 2014
quotequote all
NerveAgent said:
liner33 said:
If you dont spend what you earn who else will ?
It doesn't "go off" ya know?
Better to leave it to your kids or the government then?

I dont get that attitude , we have saved enough for my son to go to uni and probably put the deposit down on his first house and will sort him out a car etc but we plan to spend the money we earn and the money we saved , otherwise whats the point of working your so hard?

Someone once told me life is split into Health, Wealth and Time , in your youth you have Health and Time but no money, in your working life you have Health and Wealth but no time and in your retirement you have Wealth and Time but your health starts to fail.







okgo

38,033 posts

198 months

Wednesday 10th December 2014
quotequote all
The lengths people with no will power will go to to convince you that saving is futile eh. wink


liner33

10,690 posts

202 months

Wednesday 10th December 2014
quotequote all
No saving with no end game is pointless it displays a lack of imagination wink

AyBee

10,533 posts

202 months

Wednesday 10th December 2014
quotequote all
NerveAgent said:
You dont have to spend what you earn, everyone keeps saying this but its nonsense!

For comparison my girlfriend and I have similar pay levels (a bit less though) to you and your wife but our mortgage is 3 times less! Everyone "expects" us to buy a bigger house, wonders why I drive a 7 year old focus etc. Ok I'm about to buy a new car but I don't have to just because I can afford too!
yes My ex was telling me I should spend more the other day because I save £1k+ every month. She's got CC debt to the tune of £3k+. Just because I have a healthy salary doesn't mean I have to spend it all!

NerveAgent

3,314 posts

220 months

Wednesday 10th December 2014
quotequote all
liner33 said:
Better to leave it to your kids or the government then?

I dont get that attitude , we have saved enough for my son to go to uni and probably put the deposit down on his first house and will sort him out a car etc but we plan to spend the money we earn and the money we saved , otherwise whats the point of working your so hard?

Someone once told me life is split into Health, Wealth and Time , in your youth you have Health and Time but no money, in your working life you have Health and Wealth but no time and in your retirement you have Wealth and Time but your health starts to fail.





So just because I haven't increased my commitments to the maximum possible I am therefore never going to spend it?

My point is its not digital, you don't have to buy the most expensive house/car you can as soon as possible. If you happen not to it doesn't mean you have to save all your money for ever like you seem to think?!

liner33

10,690 posts

202 months

Thursday 11th December 2014
quotequote all
You said "you don't have to spend what you earn" but what you meant was you don't have to spend all you earn straight away

If you don't spend what you earn then someone else will have to

Saving for a rainy day , or for an end game is fine , saving for no reason is pointless you may end up like the previous posters auntie , or my 89yr old grandfather who spent his working life cycling to work and saving money and is now sat on £100,000s and no hope of spending it

It's about striking a balance

otolith

56,111 posts

204 months

Thursday 11th December 2014
quotequote all
NerveAgent said:
liner33 said:
If you dont spend what you earn who else will ?
It doesn't "go off" ya know?
It kind of does, if you are making less than inflation in interest.

decadent

2,173 posts

175 months

Monday 15th December 2014
quotequote all
All relative as others have said. I voted 40K as I think that would be sensible and achievable for most professinals, however in reality it isn't enough in this country, where most of the jobs are.

I'm in the £40-50 bracket, as is my wife albeit @ 60% hours now we have a child. My house is a standard semi in the southeast (no garage; first world problems). With mortgage, 3 days a weeks nursery, one car there isn't much left over. Certainly not enough for anything better than a 3 star holiday in the costas.

Before kids we were very comfortable though.

I have noticed a lot of my peers have substantial financial help from parents to buy houses. In fact I don't know anyone out of 15 close acquaintance couples in their 30s who have bought a house without help, unlike us so all relative.


Fastchas

2,646 posts

121 months

Monday 15th December 2014
quotequote all
I get paid enough now, thank you. Just not often enough...

PorkInsider

5,888 posts

141 months

Monday 15th December 2014
quotequote all
liner33 said:
You said "you don't have to spend what you earn" but what you meant was you don't have to spend all you earn straight away

If you don't spend what you earn then someone else will have to

Saving for a rainy day , or for an end game is fine , saving for no reason is pointless you may end up like the previous posters auntie , or my 89yr old grandfather who spent his working life cycling to work and saving money and is now sat on £100,000s and no hope of spending it

It's about striking a balance
I would agree entirely, however we also shouldn't underestimate value of the comfort that comes from having a sizeable chunk sat in the bank or in safe investments.

Knowing that if you were to lose your job you could comfortably live on savings for a year or more without changing your lifestyle or incurring any debt is probably as valuable to some people as the shiny trinkets are to others.

I like to think I have the balance quite well sorted but everyone has their own level at which they can sleep easy.

rossi1001

111 posts

121 months

Sunday 21st December 2014
quotequote all
djc206 said:
AudiSport said:
My Aunty and Uncle both earned very good money for most of their working lives. They saved every penny they could, living well within their means in an effort to enjoy retirement traveling the world together. They both became millionaires when they retired and cashed in their options etc.

6-months later my Aunty was dead.

It's all about balance. Spend some, waist some and save some. I'm by no means an expert, but this is something I do ponder over regularly myself.
Definitely. I'm 28 and I spend pretty much everything I earn at the moment, I'm not prepared to miser away my money when I'm in the prime of my life. I'm not going to save to travel in my retirement I'm going to travel now whilst my health is there and I'm fully mobile. Saving heavily for a future that's not guaranteed to me is bonkers.

I'm not saying saving is silly of course it's not but there are people so obsessed with saving that they're actually not living, you only get one shot at life folks.

I work with a guy who saves religiously, he's a millionaire, a few times over I should imagine. Why? He's so used to saving he'll never spend it so all he's achieved is an estate to leave to next of kin that don't exist.
Totally agree with this, mind you I took the spending in the prime of life a little too far and ended up in a right financial mess!! However I did have a lot of fun. I'm now 29 and have really knuckled down in the last 18 months to clear the debts and will be done in just 3-4 months. I'm earning more now and I plan to buy my first place and buy a half decent new (used) car in 2015. Whilst my crazy drinking / partying days are now mostly behind me I still like to have fun and want to indulge some other things I've always wanted to do now like owning a classic car.

I've recently been diagnosed with a life long illness (arthritis) so I know that my old age probably isn't going to be all that much fun so I don't see the point of saving your whole life. I have a friend who is like the guy described above. He has at least £50k in savings if not more, but since leaving uni (he's 30 now) his life has been so so dull!

Going back to the topic I'm now on £38k plus a (small) bonus. I'm pretty happy with that and I don't see any reason for not being on £50 - £60k in five years from now (I work in insurance). I think I have a decent work life balance too but that came from moving from an (awful) large company to a much smaller, friendlier firm. I really do think anywhere between about 30 to 200 staff is the best size of company to work for.