Uncovered Tattoos and work.

Author
Discussion

Robertj21a

16,477 posts

105 months

Monday 26th September 2016
quotequote all
SystemParanoia said:
are these so bad as to prevent all future employment ?





In my opinion they are not particularly significant tattoos. I'm assuming that the concerns are more related to significant coverings of the face/neck.

popeyewhite

19,875 posts

120 months

Monday 26th September 2016
quotequote all
I'm sure they could all get employment somewhere... .

SystemParanoia

14,343 posts

198 months

popeyewhite

19,875 posts

120 months

Monday 26th September 2016
quotequote all
biggrin

austinsmirk

5,597 posts

123 months

Monday 26th September 2016
quotequote all
With regard to the lady in the picture (office manager), her inking's don't offend me, I just find them utterly terrible and childish. To the degree I'd be laughing at them all the time, thinking WTF ?!

therein lies the problem with them, pretty much most of them look like someone saved up £50, booked a session and said what can you do. Its rare you see a beautiful drawing on a great body: it's normally the scribbles of a child on acres of wobbly flesh.


Then again I'm the same employer who wouldn't employ you if you smoke: you'll be unfit, lazy and have sick days because yr health is done for.


Then again I'm the same employer who wouldn't employ you if you are significantly fat: you'll be unfit, lazy and have sick days because yr health is done for.

Zoon

6,706 posts

121 months

Monday 26th September 2016
quotequote all
SystemParanoia said:
are these so bad as to prevent all future employment ?
[/img]

If you are a foot model possibly?

Issi

1,782 posts

150 months

Monday 26th September 2016
quotequote all
austinsmirk said:
With regard to the lady in the picture (office manager), her inking's don't offend me, I just find them utterly terrible and childish. To the degree I'd be laughing at them all the time, thinking WTF ?!

therein lies the problem with them, pretty much most of them look like someone saved up £50, booked a session and said what can you do. Its rare you see a beautiful drawing on a great body: it's normally the scribbles of a child on acres of wobbly flesh.


Then again I'm the same employer who wouldn't employ you if you smoke: you'll be unfit, lazy and have sick days because yr health is done for.


Then again I'm the same employer who wouldn't employ you if you are significantly fat: you'll be unfit, lazy and have sick days because yr health is done for.
Why do you type all of this so eloquently, but then can't be bothered to spell YOUR correctly?

WD39

20,083 posts

116 months

Monday 26th September 2016
quotequote all
ChasW said:
Robertj21a said:
Perhaps if someone could explain WHY they felt the need to have large tattoos over their face/neck it might be easier to understand the logic behind it.
In many, underlying self-image issues I guess.
Agree. Insecurity will feature highly on the reasons that people get tattoos.

Generally, they feel that they are invisible, so do something that gets them noticed.

As per another PH thread, Personal and chav number plates fall into the same category.

WD39

20,083 posts

116 months

Monday 26th September 2016
quotequote all
Robertj21a said:
SystemParanoia said:
are these so bad as to prevent all future employment ?





In my opinion they are not particularly significant tattoos. I'm assuming that the concerns are more related to significant coverings of the face/neck.
From the top, careers are waitng in the followinfg fields: Doctor, Chemist, Wine glass designer.

Robertj21a

16,477 posts

105 months

Monday 26th September 2016
quotequote all
SystemParanoia said:
At least she's hidden away 'behind the scenes' rolleyes

WD39

20,083 posts

116 months

Monday 26th September 2016
quotequote all
wolf1 said:
WD39 said:
tattoos put out the worst possible message and image to the customer.

Edited by WD39 on Sunday 25th September 18:20
In your opinion and the other small minded people out there maybe, the rest of us take people as they are and couldn't care less what people what do to their bodies as we are open minded enough to accept everyone as they are and not purely on how they appear.
It's easy to put someone down just because you disagree with them.

'You never have a second chance to make a first impression', goes the cliche, but it's true. Most of us form an opinion within about 10 seconds of meeting somebody. This is usually based on appearance which is why those of us who dislike tattoos have a negative view of a person with inkings without knowing anything about them.

Small minded in that respect? I can live with that.


Edited by WD39 on Monday 26th September 17:57

Pothole

34,367 posts

282 months

Monday 26th September 2016
quotequote all
Brads67 said:
BigLion said:
I don't think anyone would want to work for you - small minded bosses are never a good thing...
You`ve not really read the last few pages have you ?

Maybe I should have put "this is sarcasm" under it.
You may have been whooshed...I hope so, anyway.

Issi

1,782 posts

150 months

Tuesday 27th September 2016
quotequote all
Sorry, that was directed towards wolf1 and not you.

TwigtheWonderkid

43,367 posts

150 months

Wednesday 28th September 2016
quotequote all
BJG1 said:
TwigtheWonderkid said:
I do, in certain circumstances. I personally think that visible tats (neck, hands, face) are a sign of very poor judgement. Even if you want them, you must know they aren't everyone's cup of tea and they will limit some opportunities, so to go ahead and get them regardless shows poor judgement and a "fk you world" attitude.

It wouldn't bother me if the person was fitting my tyres but I wouldn't be impressed if my financial adviser had them. I'd be looking for someone else to handle my money.

Of course, this is just my personal opinion, but that's the only opinion that matters when I make my choices.
Pretty bigoted IMO.
Fine. You're entitled to your view. You just carry on thru life not being wary of people with neck and face tats, and I'll carry on avoiding them wherever possible. I suspect I will have less hassle in my life than you.

ChasW

2,135 posts

202 months

Wednesday 28th September 2016
quotequote all
TwigtheWonderkid said:
BJG1 said:
TwigtheWonderkid said:
I do, in certain circumstances. I personally think that visible tats (neck, hands, face) are a sign of very poor judgement. Even if you want them, you must know they aren't everyone's cup of tea and they will limit some opportunities, so to go ahead and get them regardless shows poor judgement and a "fk you world" attitude.

It wouldn't bother me if the person was fitting my tyres but I wouldn't be impressed if my financial adviser had them. I'd be looking for someone else to handle my money.

Of course, this is just my personal opinion, but that's the only opinion that matters when I make my choices.
Pretty bigoted IMO.
Fine. You're entitled to your view. You just carry on thru life not being wary of people with neck and face tats, and I'll carry on avoiding them wherever possible. I suspect I will have less hassle in my life than you.
I think that the bottom line here is that if potential employers/customers have negative perceptions of tattoos then it's a bad choice for those depending on the goodwill of these people. IMO the current ink infatuation is the equivalent of mullet haircuts in the 80s. Looked good at the time but quickly went out of fashion. The difference is you can get rid of a mullet in 20 minutes and for less than £10 and move on. The cheap tatt brands you for life. My worry would be that 10 years on, tatt = pratt.

SystemParanoia

14,343 posts

198 months

Wednesday 28th September 2016
quotequote all
solicitor... i think ?

http://apropomagazin.md/2011/06/07/si-a-pus-coarne...



edit:

yes, a 'lawyer' i stand corrected

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2481092/I-...

Edited by SystemParanoia on Wednesday 28th September 21:29

Issi

1,782 posts

150 months

Wednesday 28th September 2016
quotequote all
Already done it, but I chose accountant.

darren9

986 posts

195 months

Thursday 29th September 2016
quotequote all
WD39 said:
That would be very difficult to judge. Members of the public are not going to discuss your tattoos if you are dealing with them in an official capacity.

More generally, tattoos are a poor life choice. When I was in the navy I did not know anyone who did not regret their inkings. Especially when in later life the tattoos fade and run so giving the appearance of a completely blue/red arm, or elsewhere.

Tattoo removal is now a growth industry as employers are not hiring applicants with ink.

They are particularly troublesome when worn by customer facing staff. It does not fill one with confidence when approached bt a tattood assistant, waiter, or even manager.

Let's hope that sense prevails and the current trend does not last too long.









Edited by WD39 on Saturday 24th September 18:36
I've only just seen this. I've Been working. I find that members of the public do discuss my tattoo. It's nothing offensive. It's a crown and my boys names on it.

A colleague of mine had several tattoos. Including a picture of a couple of the members of slipknot (each to their own) and on a couple of occasions his tattoos have actually had a positive effect on dealing with members of the public.

I'm not dealing with the upper class or higher members of businesses on a regular basis in my professional capacity I don't find that anyone has reacted badly and since they usually find something they don't like about you that's quite a shock (last week someone too offence at my nose, it's not even that big).

I'm planning on some more work when I have the time/money. I'm "customer facing" but tattoos have not been an issue.

xjay1337

15,966 posts

118 months

Thursday 29th September 2016
quotequote all
I have 2 largeish arm pieces and never been a problem

Robertj21a

16,477 posts

105 months

Thursday 29th September 2016
quotequote all

At least tattoos have been associated with men, particularly those at sea, for centuries. It's the current fad for women to get heavily tattooed that surprises me - do they really consider how they'll look in, say, 20 years time ?