M3/4 in the wet

M3/4 in the wet

Author
Discussion

Burwood

18,709 posts

246 months

Monday 6th April 2015
quotequote all
Helicopter123 said:
335d x drive M Sport will be quicker in the wet, and just as fast "real world" in the dry in the hands of most drivers.

M3/M4 more special and quicker on the track.
Sure but it's a noisy diesel smile

motors

127 posts

182 months

Monday 6th April 2015
quotequote all
joscal said:
Jazzer]otors said:
Just sold my F10 M5 found traction poor in damp/wet even with heated mps tyres.[/quote

This sounds somewhat pathetic....,,
This why buy a rwd m car and expect it to be 4wd. Mind boggles.
Had several Mpower rwd cars over the years so didn't expect 4wd performance in the damp, last mpower was csl that was great in the damp possible because it was more progressive power delivery being n/a. Always liked mpss so didnt go for the winter tyres, may have worth a go but cars gone now.

j80jpw

826 posts

162 months

Monday 6th April 2015
quotequote all
The 335d touring x drive I had as a courtesy car seemed to have quite soft suspension, some local back roads near me which are a bit up and down but a pleasure to negotiate quickly in the Cayenne were quite hard work. It didn't take much to bottom out the sususpension, I assume the M cars are much harder? Still an impressively quick car though and certainly no slouch off the line.

ACE997

51 posts

161 months

Monday 6th April 2015
quotequote all
rs4al said:
Have been thinking about a new M3 f80 and was wondering how bad is it in the wet ?

Having had Audi's for most of my driving life I do like the ease of performance in wet conditions. Also having read a few reviews about the TC is very intrusive in the M3 has got me thinking if I would actually enjoy owning one.
I have an F10 M5 and am considering an F80 M3 when my lease is up. I have driven the F80 M3 and F82 M4 a few times. I have owned a few fast AWD cars. On warmed up Michelin PSS tyres on dry roads traction is very good in the Ms but in the wet, relative to AWD, even with Michelin Alpins, traction is relatively poor. If you want maximum traction in the wet, get something with AWD. Obviously, AWD comes with its own disadvantages (weight, balance, steering etc) so you need to decide how important "ease of performance in wet conditions" is to you.

Edited by ACE997 on Monday 6th April 21:25

cringle

397 posts

186 months

Monday 6th April 2015
quotequote all
My M4 is useless in the wet. The torque comes in so suddenly that the TC kicks in and you look like a fool or you switch it off and pray you dont do unintentional donuts. So many vids on Youtube of M4's losing it in the dry, imagine what its like in the wet. 335d xdrives/S3's etc will be quicker in the wet unless you can drive like schumacher

theboss

6,913 posts

219 months

Monday 6th April 2015
quotequote all
cringle said:
My M4 is useless in the wet. The torque comes in so suddenly that the TC kicks in and you look like a fool or you switch it off and pray you dont do unintentional donuts. So many vids on Youtube of M4's losing it in the dry, imagine what its like in the wet. 335d xdrives/S3's etc will be quicker in the wet unless you can drive like schumacher
What I've learned in barely 3 weeks with an M5 is that the car only behaves unpredictably and eratically if your inputs are the same. It doesn't take Schumacher to learn to be progressive. It seems some people want theirs cars Playstation-esque with a binary X button instead of a long throttle.

cringle

397 posts

186 months

Tuesday 7th April 2015
quotequote all
As a biker who rides in advanced group on trackdays I dont need to be taught about progressive throttle inputs. I do a lot of city driving and pulling out of junctions quickly inthe wet is a ballache in the M4. A few wks ago when it was colder, i remember the TC flashing when changing from 3rd to 4th on the mway with an outside temp of 4C (coldish tyres). WithTC off it would have been interesting. The M5/M6 have a more linear torque delivery especially at lower rpm which is why you probably dont get the same issues. Incidentally i went for a drive up the Cat and Fiddle yesterday with an F80 M3, an S3 and a Golf R. A very twisty and fairly dangerous road for those unfamiliar with it. The Golf R was as near as dammit fast as the M3/4. And if that isn't a "real world" test I dont know what is.

theboss

6,913 posts

219 months

Tuesday 7th April 2015
quotequote all
cringle said:
As a biker who rides in advanced group on trackdays I dont need to be taught about progressive throttle inputs. I do a lot of city driving and pulling out of junctions quickly inthe wet is a ballache in the M4. A few wks ago when it was colder, i remember the TC flashing when changing from 3rd to 4th on the mway with an outside temp of 4C (coldish tyres). WithTC off it would have been interesting. The M5/M6 have a more linear torque delivery especially at lower rpm which is why you probably dont get the same issues. Incidentally i went for a drive up the Cat and Fiddle yesterday with an F80 M3, an S3 and a Golf R. A very twisty and fairly dangerous road for those unfamiliar with it. The Golf R was as near as dammit fast as the M3/4. And if that isn't a "real world" test I dont know what is.
I stand corrected if the M3/4 is that nonlinear in its torque. I certainly agree these cars are compromised in the wet but useless sounds dismissive - as a biker I'd have thought these AWD 'go fast anywhere' cars would bore you senseless! I have a Golf R arriving next month so it'll be interesting to get a feel for comparative performance in less than perfect conditions.

Panthro

682 posts

218 months

Tuesday 7th April 2015
quotequote all
Shock horror that 4WD is faster and more composed in the wet than RWD.

W8PMC

3,345 posts

238 months

Tuesday 7th April 2015
quotequote all
Does get very boring this 'RWD cars are impossible to drive in the wet' as it's total BS.

No matter what you're driving, you turn the wick down when the conditions dictate. If you drive a 991 Turbo S or a C7 RS6 or heaven forbid even an R35 GT-R the same in the wet as you would in the dry then you'll end up just as dead as you would in a RWD car.

Not sure who wrote pulling out of side roads is a nightmare in an M4, but i've not experienced any embarrassment or difficulty doing such in my F10 M5 & mine's far from stock. Every now & again i get the odd interesting wiggle in the dry at speed, but i know it's coming & what's to be expected from the huge wall of torque.

I certainly don't switch the TC off away from the track as that would be a little bit silly, but having owned many AWD cars & a couple of M cars i don't buy into the RWD is bad & AWD is good camp as it's a totally different driving experience & although being RWD may marginally limit progress in the worse driving conditions, it more than makes up for it in other areas. To be honest i of course see the advantages of both & will no doubt have other RWD cars & other AWD cars, however i like the ability to have a multi dimensional driving experience & i find that to be the case with M cars.

Lost soul

8,712 posts

182 months

Tuesday 7th April 2015
quotequote all
P13TR0 said:
It's a universe in which people who don't own a proper M car say these things to justify their mediocre existence in a 335d....
a 335d is hardly mediocre is it , what hes saying is in real world with traffic and road conditions both are fast enough on the road unless you are driving like an absolute tool

cringle

397 posts

186 months

Tuesday 7th April 2015
quotequote all
To all the M5 owners commenting, this thread is about M3/M4's.

Lost soul

8,712 posts

182 months

Tuesday 7th April 2015
quotequote all
cringle said:
To all the M5 owners commenting, this thread is about M3/M4's.
It is still about powerful RWD cars so what's your problem

Wills2

22,811 posts

175 months

Tuesday 7th April 2015
quotequote all
cringle said:
To all the M5 owners commenting, this thread is about M3/M4's.
Lol...

cringle

397 posts

186 months

Tuesday 7th April 2015
quotequote all
the OP asked a question about M3 and M4s in the wet. not M5s. there is a significant difference in weight, power delivery and general characteristics between the two cars. perhaps you should start your own general thread about powerful RWD cars?

Wills2

22,811 posts

175 months

Tuesday 7th April 2015
quotequote all
Stop being silly, or are you being serious? confused

P13TR0

49 posts

114 months

Tuesday 7th April 2015
quotequote all
Lost soul said:
a 335d is hardly mediocre is it , what hes saying is in real world with traffic and road conditions both are fast enough on the road unless you are driving like an absolute tool
It's not all about speed though is it? It's the way the power is delivered and everything else that goes with a high displacement petrol engine.... Plus I would argue that having to wear a hand condom every time you fill up with heavy oil does somewhat constitute a mediocre existence!

e21Mark

16,205 posts

173 months

Tuesday 7th April 2015
quotequote all
I've had a 2013 M3 for a few weeks now and haven't had any issues re wet weather traction. Then again, I haven't been stomping on the loud pedal expecting it not to break traction. Although I much prefer my E30 M3, there's no denying just what a competent and fast car the V8 M3 really is. Drive it like a tit and I have no doubt it'll bite though.

Driver101

14,376 posts

121 months

Tuesday 7th April 2015
quotequote all
If people struggle to drive a RWD car in the wet you need to look at the most likely problem, the driver.

How on earth has the world managed for all these years with RWD, yet now with the advancement in tyres, handling and various driver aids in cars, has RWD become harder?

Cars are going to become even more robotic soon with them having to do every last thing for the driver.

Jim1556

1,771 posts

156 months

Tuesday 7th April 2015
quotequote all
P13TR0 said:
Plus I would argue that having to wear a hand condom every time you fill up with heavy oil does somewhat constitute a mediocre existence!
What crawled up your arse n died?

My M3 drinks V Power and gets leathered when I get the chance, my VRS diesel (I used to do 30k miles a year) does 50+mpg when I pick my nipper up on the 6hr drive. I'm not stupid enough to get disiesel all over my hands when I fill it up. Don't think that makes my existence mediocre!