E92 M3 or M135i

E92 M3 or M135i

Author
Discussion

Crafty_

13,286 posts

200 months

Monday 6th April 2015
quotequote all
M135i reaches 320lb/ft at 1800 RPM and holds it for most of the rev range, so it probably would pull well.
The biggest criticism (especially for the guys putting it on a track) is the steering being lacking in feel (can't say I noticed on a test drive, it was certainly better than the golf R I also drove), but the yanks have figured out you can use F8x control arms on a 235, thus also on a 135. One of the blokes on babybmw has just done the mod, gives more camber, thus better feel etc. Apparently uprated anti roll bars on the rear are a good mod for track days too.

BMW sell a plate style diff, keeps warranty intact and is an outright purchase, allowing for removal when the car is sold.

Quaife do a torque bias one on exchange basis (ring gear has to be cut off & re-welded).

Wavetrac do their diff, again on exchange basis.

IIRC they are all a similar cost.

billywhizzzzzz

2,007 posts

143 months

Monday 6th April 2015
quotequote all
it's not really about the speed, is it? It's more about how it does it, and how much of an event it is to drive. M135i is fast, but utterly anodyne compared to the M3. And as everyone says, you've just got to have a V8.

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

198 months

Monday 6th April 2015
quotequote all
OP

Have you ever owned a Na V8 dry sump engine?
Do you like to work the power unit really hard to unlock its hidden gems
It's likely the M3 V8 will become less of a car to use as a daily before not too long as such it's knid of now or never.
Do you like synthesised engine induction and exhaust noise or the real deal?
Do you like LSD as Std
Have you owned an M3 before.


YOLO what's the worst that can happen? Go for the V8 enjoy it for s year then get something else.

rassi

2,453 posts

251 months

Monday 6th April 2015
quotequote all
I was in the same situation and chose the M3: http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=...

Having owned it for 1.5 months and 3000 km, I am convinced I made the right choice. That engine is very special and coupled with the DCT it is not lacking in torque and its linear power delivery with that extra buss at the top end is something to be experienced - there will not be another like it, excepting the RS5 and GT3s.

But do drive both, it is of course a personal choice.

EricE

Original Poster:

1,945 posts

129 months

Monday 6th April 2015
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
OP

Have you ever owned a Na V8 dry sump engine?
No. frown

Welshbeef said:
Do you like to work the power unit really hard to unlock its hidden gems
Yes smile

Welshbeef said:
It's likely the M3 V8 will become less of a car to use as a daily before not too long as such it's knid of now or never.
True!

Welshbeef said:
Do you like synthesised engine induction and exhaust noise or the real deal?
... come on now...

Welshbeef said:
Do you like LSD as Std
Oh yes smile
Welshbeef said:
Have you owned an M3 before.
No

Welshbeef said:
YOLO what's the worst that can happen? Go for the V8 enjoy it for s year then get something else.
I like your style sir. thumbup

Wills2

22,832 posts

175 months

Tuesday 7th April 2015
quotequote all
You have to get the M3, it feels taught, balanced and that engine is one of the best it really is superb.


RossP

2,523 posts

283 months

Tuesday 7th April 2015
quotequote all
I have an M135i, which I got new last June. Before that I had a lightly used E92 M3 for two years (bought with 15k on the clock).

I would agree with most of your pros and cons. So it depends what you want from the car.

The M3 feels special, whereas the M135i doesn't really.

The M3 does feel tauter and is much easier to slide around (if that's your thing). Not tried an M135i with an LSD though.

The M3 makes lots of nice noise especially when you get the obligatory 'OEM exhaust mod'. M135i sounds ok.

M3 turns heads (see OEM exhaust mod above), M135i is invisible (sometimes a good thing).

The M3 has to be worked hard to get the most performance out of it as it loves to rev.

The M135i pulls hard from any revs, so is a better real world car. In reality, I don't think there is much in it performance wise.

M135i has better brakes!

The M135i tech is MUCH better especially if you get Pro Nav.

I borrowed an M4 for a couple of days and will most likely be getting a used example (M3 or M4) when the prices dip a bit more (maybe 12 months time).

EricE

Original Poster:

1,945 posts

129 months

Tuesday 7th April 2015
quotequote all
I found a nice, very clean '08 M3 with 26000 miles for well below £30000 close to me and contacted the owner but I'm still conflicted.

Ideally I'd want the stealth, dimensions, running costs and torque from the M135i with the "specialness" and sound of the M3. The M2 may be close to that but I expect pricing will be quite up there.

M3/M4 is great too, I test drove one at launch and was astonished by the torque. The engine sound wasn't so great but the upsides far outweigh the downsides for a daily driver, it's just far more than I'd like to spend at the moment. A new M4 is £80k after taxes over here and that's Cayman GT4 territory...

Isn't surprising how that little hatch is so close to the old "hero car" in outright performance? In the end it's still a very good hot hatch while the M3 is an icon to me and a bucket list item I'd like to tick.
Without having test driven the two, the heart says M3 but the head says M135i.

Lost soul

8,712 posts

182 months

Tuesday 7th April 2015
quotequote all
billywhizzzzzz said:
it's not really about the speed, is it? It's more about how it does it, and how much of an event it is to drive. M135i is fast, but utterly anodyne compared to the M3. And as everyone says, you've just got to have a V8.
yes

Lefty

16,154 posts

202 months

Tuesday 7th April 2015
quotequote all
EricE said:
I found a nice, very clean '08 M3 with 26000 miles for well below £30000 close to me and contacted the owner but I'm still conflicted.

Ideally I'd want the stealth, dimensions, running costs and torque from the M135i with the "specialness" and sound of the M3. The M2 may be close to that but I expect pricing will be quite up there.

M3/M4 is great too, I test drove one at launch and was astonished by the torque. The engine sound wasn't so great but the upsides far outweigh the downsides for a daily driver, it's just far more than I'd like to spend at the moment. A new M4 is £80k after taxes over here and that's Cayman GT4 territory...

Isn't surprising how that little hatch is so close to the old "hero car" in outright performance? In the end it's still a very good hot hatch while the M3 is an icon to me and a bucket list item I'd like to tick.
Without having test driven the two, the heart says M3 but the head says M135i.
Thing is, the M3 is still a pretty sensible car - it's totally practical, likely to be very reliable, 4 proper seats etc. It will be fine in traffic, on motorways, on backroads.

It's not like your head says m135 but you heart says Caterham or classic Vette. There's nothing the M135 can do that the M3 can't (well, apart from 35mpg!)

Gruber

6,313 posts

214 months

Tuesday 7th April 2015
quotequote all
What you need, chap, is a 1M wink Except for the V8, it combines the pros of both the M3 and the M135i very well indeed, and definitely has that "specialness" mentioned above.

But if it's a choice between the e92 and the 135i, I'd choose the e92. The V8 really is a superb engine and, having owned two of them, I really never thought it wanted for torque. That said, they do suit the DCT box better than manual, IMHO.

The size thing is over-played, in my view. The chassis really is ace. Having enjoyed a "spirited drive" around north Wales in the company of two CSLs and a Z3MC, the heavy old heffalump of an e92 acquitted itself very well indeed.

bennyboysvuk

3,491 posts

248 months

Tuesday 7th April 2015
quotequote all
I opted for the M135i because it's a hatchback. I'd have preferred the M3 to drive though.

Things that frustrate me about the M135i include:

- Lack of LSD. When the rears are both spinning together in a straight line it feels like weird individual wheel braking is going on even though the DSC is all off.
- Turning off the DSC takes nearly 5 seconds, which is a long way at NSL speeds.
- Hitting the brakes hard causes the hazard warning lights to come on.
- Turbo lag. Off throttle at 4 or 5k, re-apply and it takes maybe half a second to get back to full boost again, which is fast, but has nothing like the immediacy of the M3's V8. I think this really detracts from the driving pleasure.
- It's more understeery than the M3, though increasing the rear tyre pressures to around 43psi makes it more neutral.

Smuler

2,286 posts

139 months

Tuesday 7th April 2015
quotequote all
Eric, I test drove them back to back, something you might want to consider, and concur with most of the folks here.

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...

Of particular note, I don't understand why a M3's performance is less useable on a day to day basis, after these test drives I returned to my old E46 325ci and found that out performed the majority of ordinary "family hatch-craps and disease-hells" that crowd our roads.

Go with "your heart," aka the M3, unless you deep down prefer the M135i, smaller, cheaper to run, stealthy....and still a bloody good car in its own right



RossP

2,523 posts

283 months

Tuesday 7th April 2015
quotequote all
Running costs is an issue. M135i definitely cheaper on fuel, tyres, brakes etc.

Also warranty - the M135i is likely to be newer and have more left...

Mermaid

21,492 posts

171 months

Tuesday 7th April 2015
quotequote all
RossP said:
Also warranty - the M135i is likely to be newer and have more left...
& cheaper to renew, it is not an M car.

RossP

2,523 posts

283 months

Tuesday 7th April 2015
quotequote all
Smuler said:
Of particular note, I don't understand why a M3's performance is less useable on a day to day basis
To get the M3 really moving, it needs revs, and is magnificent with it. The low end grunt on the M135i is what makes it a more usable day-to-day car.

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

198 months

Tuesday 7th April 2015
quotequote all
RossP said:
Running costs is an issue. M135i definitely cheaper on fuel, tyres, brakes etc.

Also warranty - the M135i is likely to be newer and have more left...
Are you looking at total car ownership costs? IE depreciation?

irishsteve

28 posts

111 months

Tuesday 7th April 2015
quotequote all
I had the same decision as you back in January. Needed a practical, 4 door car which I could track a few times a year.

Went for the M3 as I figured opportunities to buy a mental V8 wouldn't come along very often in the future and it will hopefully be worth more than the M135i in a few years.

The petrol tank is highly annoying, and the sat nav is useless, but still 100% happy I made the right choice.

cerb4.5lee

30,614 posts

180 months

Tuesday 7th April 2015
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
YOLO what's the worst that can happen?
You buy the E92 M3 and wonder why you bothered because you got sucked into the blinkered hype that surrounds it! hehe

As a daily it would be the M135i all day long for me but as a car to use occasionally to find that right road at the right time to enjoy what the V8 is good at then that's when the M3 does hit the spot.

marting

668 posts

174 months

Tuesday 7th April 2015
quotequote all
Gruber said:
What you need, chap, is a 1M wink Except for the V8, it combines the pros of both the M3 and the M135i very well indeed, and definitely has that "specialness" mentioned above.
I dont think you could pick up a 1M for OP's budget? Arent they over 40k still?