What's The F10 M5 Like To Live With Real-world ?

What's The F10 M5 Like To Live With Real-world ?

Author
Discussion

Joscal

2,078 posts

200 months

Saturday 25th March 2017
quotequote all
My average is 18, better than 14ish in the E60👍

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

198 months

Saturday 25th March 2017
quotequote all
Joscal said:
My average is 18, better than 14ish in the E60??
I averaged 16mpg in a C5 RS6 with a 5 speed box which didn't go into 5th until 50 or actually 60mph so holding higher revs than it needed to for most of the time (which was the norm for a std car. I believe some people remapped be gearbox to allow higher gear change up for lower speeds).

As such I find this surprising mpg from the F10 with much more gears stop start and probably 20years engine development ahead.

Unless of course it's driving stylesmile.

Joscal

2,078 posts

200 months

Saturday 25th March 2017
quotequote all
Unfortunately almost all of my journeys are in heavy stop start traffic, 28 is easily achievable on a run.

theboss

6,913 posts

219 months

Saturday 25th March 2017
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
RWD cossie wil said:
28.5mpg is a lie rofl

Love the car already.
Do these cars do anything like the mpg BMW quote of is it all BS.
Depends how you drive it - I've only ever seen 28-30mpg on a sedate motorway cruise. A 100 mile journey across country roads yesterday evening saw me average about 19mpg but I was driving in Sport+, sunroof open and giving it plenty of stick when appropriate. If I'd left it in eco everything and been happy to drive at 45mph with everything else I may have seen mid 20's. The map also worsened consumption by about 10%

likesachange

2,631 posts

194 months

Sunday 26th March 2017
quotequote all
If you can't achieve 28+ when trying on mundane 70-80mph cruises then you need to assess your eco-driving brain.

I average 18/19 but a lot of town driving and heavy throttle.

Not sure there is anything more economic with 600+bhp and 2 tons... ? (Tesla not included)

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

198 months

Sunday 26th March 2017
quotequote all
likesachange said:
If you can't achieve 28+ when trying on mundane 70-80mph cruises then you need to assess your eco-driving brain.

I average 18/19 but a lot of town driving and heavy throttle.

Not sure there is anything more economic with 600+bhp and 2 tons... ? (Tesla not included)
XK-r dynamic is good on mpg
E63 hot v BI Turbo too


How about the A8 4.2 V8 TDI these are what 440bhp standard easily tuneable upwards not sure 600mbhp but would be a good rate I'd wager that will be superior on mpg but not so on noise.

zainster

441 posts

176 months

Sunday 26th March 2017
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
likesachange said:
If you can't achieve 28+ when trying on mundane 70-80mph cruises then you need to assess your eco-driving brain.

I average 18/19 but a lot of town driving and heavy throttle.

Not sure there is anything more economic with 600+bhp and 2 tons... ? (Tesla not included)
XK-r dynamic is good on mpg
E63 hot v BI Turbo too


How about the A8 4.2 V8 TDI these are what 440bhp standard easily tuneable upwards not sure 600mbhp but would be a good rate I'd wager that will be superior on mpg but not so on noise.
The current A8 4.2 TDI is 380bhp so not sure where you got 440bhp from (is this a new model on the horizon?)

The other two you mentioned will be similar to the M5.

The Livster

222 posts

116 months

Sunday 26th March 2017
quotequote all
My regular 600 round trip to Aberdeen returns 27/28 obc. Cruise set to 75 on dual carriageway sections , bit of thrashing on A/B roads , happy with that

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

198 months

Sunday 26th March 2017
quotequote all
zainster said:
The current A8 4.2 TDI is 380bhp so not sure where you got 440bhp from (is this a new model on the horizon?)

The other two you mentioned will be similar to the M5.
395bhp from the new G30 540d
The old one was 375bhp and mapped to >440bhp so all else being equal tho will be a 460+ remapped unit with 4x4... a weapon.

zainster

441 posts

176 months

Sunday 26th March 2017
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
zainster said:
The current A8 4.2 TDI is 380bhp so not sure where you got 440bhp from (is this a new model on the horizon?)

The other two you mentioned will be similar to the M5.
395bhp from the new G30 540d
The old one was 375bhp and mapped to >440bhp so all else being equal tho will be a 460+ remapped unit with 4x4... a weapon.
Lol ... You mentioned the Audi A8 diesel with 380bhp to compare to a circa 600hp car ..

Now the new G30 540d xdrive which happens to be 313bhp! so well off the 395bhp you say.
The M550d X drive that we never got over here last time, was 375bhp and the new one based on the G30 will now have 395bhp.

So, any cars circa 600hp cars you can suggest that are much better on mpg? nah, didn't think so! biggrin


Welshbeef

49,633 posts

198 months

Sunday 26th March 2017
quotequote all
zainster said:
Welshbeef said:
zainster said:
The current A8 4.2 TDI is 380bhp so not sure where you got 440bhp from (is this a new model on the horizon?)

The other two you mentioned will be similar to the M5.
395bhp from the new G30 540d
The old one was 375bhp and mapped to >440bhp so all else being equal tho will be a 460+ remapped unit with 4x4... a weapon.
Lol ... You mentioned the Audi A8 diesel with 380bhp to compare to a circa 600hp car ..

Now the new G30 540d xdrive which happens to be 313bhp! so well off the 395bhp you say.
The M550d X drive that we never got over here last time, was 375bhp and the new one based on the G30 will now have 395bhp.

So, any cars circa 600hp cars you can suggest that are much better on mpg? nah, didn't think so! biggrin
Lol

313bhp is the 335d car & F10 535d car (actually isn't the last F10 535d 320bhp..?).
The current LHD F10 M550d is 375bhp.

http://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/new-cars/2017-bm...

theboss

6,913 posts

219 months

Sunday 26th March 2017
quotequote all
I don't think there's much you can to do avoid the fact that driven like-for-like, the M5 will cost near enough twice as much to fuel as an equivalent sized diesel. For people who buy them, it's clearly an acceptable price to pay and they won't be motivated by the fact that 'it can do 30mpg at a push'. There are occasions when I feel I'd be better off in a 740d e.g. when I've been filling the M5 three times a week just to blast up and down motorways, but generally I'm delighted with it and don't give a second thought to fuel consumption. If it were doing low-mid teens consistently and/or had a smaller tank like the E60 then the limited range would detract from its practical use as a high mileage daily though.

likesachange

2,631 posts

194 months

Sunday 26th March 2017
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
XK-r dynamic is good on mpg
E63 hot v BI Turbo too


How about the A8 4.2 V8 TDI these are what 440bhp standard easily tuneable upwards not sure 600mbhp but would be a good rate I'd wager that will be superior on mpg but not so on noise.
Yeah am sure a few are on same level but doubt there much better or better at all, and probably claim silly high mpg figures too.

Wills2

22,804 posts

175 months

Sunday 26th March 2017
quotequote all
zainster said:
Welshbeef said:
zainster said:
The current A8 4.2 TDI is 380bhp so not sure where you got 440bhp from (is this a new model on the horizon?)

The other two you mentioned will be similar to the M5.
395bhp from the new G30 540d
The old one was 375bhp and mapped to >440bhp so all else being equal tho will be a 460+ remapped unit with 4x4... a weapon.
Lol ... You mentioned the Audi A8 diesel with 380bhp to compare to a circa 600hp car ..

Now the new G30 540d xdrive which happens to be 313bhp! so well off the 395bhp you say.
The M550d X drive that we never got over here last time, was 375bhp and the new one based on the G30 will now have 395bhp.

So, any cars circa 600hp cars you can suggest that are much better on mpg? nah, didn't think so! biggrin
I find it best to ignore his numbers, they're just made up off the cuff.



zainster

441 posts

176 months

Sunday 26th March 2017
quotequote all
Wills2 said:
zainster said:
Welshbeef said:
zainster said:
The current A8 4.2 TDI is 380bhp so not sure where you got 440bhp from (is this a new model on the horizon?)

The other two you mentioned will be similar to the M5.
395bhp from the new G30 540d
The old one was 375bhp and mapped to >440bhp so all else being equal tho will be a 460+ remapped unit with 4x4... a weapon.
Lol ... You mentioned the Audi A8 diesel with 380bhp to compare to a circa 600hp car ..

Now the new G30 540d xdrive which happens to be 313bhp! so well off the 395bhp you say.
The M550d X drive that we never got over here last time, was 375bhp and the new one based on the G30 will now have 395bhp.

So, any cars circa 600hp cars you can suggest that are much better on mpg? nah, didn't think so! biggrin
I find it best to ignore his numbers, they're just made up off the cuff.

Haha. .. Yes I totally agree on both counts! Lol

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

198 months

Sunday 26th March 2017
quotequote all
theboss said:
I don't think there's much you can to do avoid the fact that driven like-for-like, the M5 will cost near enough twice as much to fuel as an equivalent sized diesel. For people who buy them, it's clearly an acceptable price to pay and they won't be motivated by the fact that 'it can do 30mpg at a push'. There are occasions when I feel I'd be better off in a 740d e.g. when I've been filling the M5 three times a week just to blast up and down motorways, but generally I'm delighted with it and don't give a second thought to fuel consumption. If it were doing low-mid teens consistently and/or had a smaller tank like the E60 then the limited range would detract from its practical use as a high mileage daily though.
The F10 is a 70ltr fuel tank for the range is the M5 different? or is it simply that it is more economical.

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

198 months

Sunday 26th March 2017
quotequote all
Wills2 said:
I find it best to ignore his numbers, they're just made up off the cuff.

Except when zinster thinks the F10 M550d is a 313bhp unit and not 375bhp.


zainster

441 posts

176 months

Sunday 26th March 2017
quotequote all
[quot:De=Welshbeef]
Wills2 said:
I find it best to ignore his numbers, they're just made up off the cuff.

Except when zinster thinks the F10 M550d is a 313bhp unit and not 375bhp.
Can add. .. wrongly quoting people as well now!

Read up again and I've clearly said the F10 M550d was 375bhp! Lol

zainster

441 posts

176 months

Sunday 26th March 2017
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
zainster said:
Welshbeef said:
zainster said:
The current A8 4.2 TDI is 380bhp so not sure where you got 440bhp from (is this a new model on the horizon?)

The other two you mentioned will be similar to the M5.
395bhp from the new G30 540d
The old one was 375bhp and mapped to >440bhp so all else being equal tho will be a 460+ remapped unit with 4x4... a weapon.
Lol ... You mentioned the Audi A8 diesel with 380bhp to compare to a circa 600hp car ..

Now the new G30 540d xdrive which happens to be 313bhp! so well off the 395bhp you say.
The M550d X drive that we never got over here last time, was 375bhp and the new one based on the G30 will now have 395bhp.

So, any cars circa 600hp cars you can suggest that are much better on mpg? nah, didn't think so! biggrin
Lol

313bhp is the 335d car & F10 535d car (actually isn't the last F10 535d 320bhp..?).
The current LHD F10 M550d is 375bhp.

http://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/new-cars/2017-bm...
Lol. . You really need to actually start reading before replying! Lol

theboss

6,913 posts

219 months

Sunday 26th March 2017
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
The F10 is a 70ltr fuel tank for the range is the M5 different? or is it simply that it is more economical.
Regular F10 is 70l, M5 is 80l which helps with the range.