RE: New M3 variants testing

RE: New M3 variants testing

Author
Discussion

squeezebm

2,319 posts

206 months

Saturday 16th June 2007
quotequote all
alex_123_fra said:
MK4 Slowride said:
You might think Audi are building better engines but the proof's in the pudding, BMW have won numerous consecutive engineering awards for their engines, Audi haven't. Also to have a good interior you have to spend that bit extra on leather instead of cloth, and you need to decide on what type of leather as well.
I don't think audi need to prove their engine build quality/performance and reliability to anyone. Le mans has been testament to this for years...including this year too most probably.

As far as build quality of the interior (as well as remainder of the car), my experience is in comparing the E46 M3 with the B7 RS4. Frankly I have seen constipated turds built more solidly than my M3 (which was bought with only 2,500 miles on the clock). The bodywork/gapping/joins and interior were awful. Plastics were cheap. Leather was of rubbish quality.

The E90 M3 has a LOT of work to do even keep on par with a B7 RS4. That plus the fact that within half a year, there will be a complete flood of them everywhere (made worse by the addition of the saloon). If it really turns out to be a good car, I'd save your money and buy a low milleage used example in about half a year.
The fact is,it has taken Audi 4/5 years in there various RS forms to eventually catch BMW's M3,and now they have surpassed the M3 with there new brilliant RS4!!! Oh bugger,the new M3's out in Sept......well at least it will give Audi something to aim @ again.

Edited by squeezebm on Saturday 16th June 23:53


Edited by squeezebm on Saturday 16th June 23:55

taffyracer

2,093 posts

244 months

Sunday 17th June 2007
quotequote all
[quote]

I don't think audi need to prove their engine build quality/performance and reliability to anyone. Le mans has been testament to this for years...including this year too most probably.

As far as build quality of the interior (as well as remainder of the car), my experience is in comparing the E46 M3 with the B7 RS4. Frankly I have seen constipated turds built more solidly than my M3 (which was bought with only 2,500 miles on the clock). The bodywork/gapping/joins and interior were awful. Plastics were cheap. Leather was of rubbish quality.quote]

I had an A4 3.0 quattro for 2 years before swapping back to BMW and my experience was nothing as you mention, every panek squeaked, the ride was poorly damped, the handling was very sterile but in fairness I will say that the levels of grip generated by the quattro was staggering. Now, I had an RS4 for a week not long back and it's a great car, but Audi still haven't sussed why BMW drivers drive BMW's. The reason why alot of people are passionate about BMW's is the way they drive, RWD can't be beaten for fun, precision and balance and belting on a hugely heavy 4wd system destroys this feeling and connection with the road. The RS4 is mighily impressive but just think how good it would be if it too, like the M3, was RWD and alot lighter, that is why the M3 albiet 7 years old, still beats an RS4 in the handling dept and why it still beats the RS4 on track

stimmers

2,312 posts

204 months

Sunday 17th June 2007
quotequote all
squeezebm said:
stimmers said:
squeezebm said:
stimmers said:
MK4 Slowride said:
I'd have a BMW over an Audi anyday, I'm not biassed at all rolleyes just because I work for BMW tongue out
I really need to go for a burn in the Audi to pass a professional opinion so got a bit of a wait before that'll happen.
Having been a BMW customer for 9 years. I have just switched to Audi and from the cars i have drive, RS4, S4, RS6 and yet to drive my S5 (ordered an RS5) , i personally think Audi are building much better looking cars, much better interiors and on the whole, better engines.

I've been seriously impressed with everything Audi so far, they have outdone BMW in every department thus far
So what i might do is pop over to the Audi forum tell everyone,how much better i think BMW is and then brag about all the cars i have owned..................Clown
I never mentioned any of the cars i have owned, i just said i was a BMW customer for 9 years. Also im not on the Audi board as i have yet to take delivery of my Audi and yet to live with it. I was merely offering my own early opinions and Audi compared to BMW. I could be wrong, as of yet i have not lived with an Audi.

May i suggest you grow up a little bit, stop being jelous when there is nothing to be jelous of and get over your obvious smalll man syndrome

Edited by stimmers on Saturday 16th June 17:09
Why so defensive and abusive? can no one else have an opinion,i have lived with both Audi and BMW so in that respect i do know what i'm talking about...........but this is what forums are for, to discuss different views little man.Oh and JEALOUS has an A in it.
Abusive? Have you read your initial post to me? You had the nerve to suggest im the clown? How old are you, about 5?

PS - If i make a typo on a computer, im really not going to lose sleep over it. Just wondering if your going to point out everyones spelling mistakes on this thread, including your own, or just mine?

I won't be wasting anymore of my time responding to your random, strange and ironic comments. So knock yourself out

Edited by stimmers on Sunday 17th June 12:31

Boulder

167 posts

204 months

Sunday 17th June 2007
quotequote all
M3 1st, C63 2nd, RS4 3rd(too slow).....This will be the outcome.

In almost every concievable road test in the history of motoring feat Audi and BMW, the BMW has always come out on top due to it being the superior machine in terms of handling, powertrain, brakes equipment ect.



squeezebm

2,319 posts

206 months

Sunday 17th June 2007
quotequote all
stimmers said:
squeezebm said:
stimmers said:
squeezebm said:
stimmers said:
MK4 Slowride said:
I'd have a BMW over an Audi anyday, I'm not biassed at all rolleyes just because I work for BMW tongue out
I really need to go for a burn in the Audi to pass a professional opinion so got a bit of a wait before that'll happen.
Having been a BMW customer for 9 years. I have just switched to Audi and from the cars i have drive, RS4, S4, RS6 and yet to drive my S5 (ordered an RS5) , i personally think Audi are building much better looking cars, much better interiors and on the whole, better engines.

I've been seriously impressed with everything Audi so far, they have outdone BMW in every department thus far
So what i might do is pop over to the Audi forum tell everyone,how much better i think BMW is and then brag about all the cars i have owned..................Clown
I never mentioned any of the cars i have owned, i just said i was a BMW customer for 9 years. Also im not on the Audi board as i have yet to take delivery of my Audi and yet to live with it. I was merely offering my own early opinions and Audi compared to BMW. I could be wrong, as of yet i have not lived with an Audi.

May i suggest you grow up a little bit, stop being jelous when there is nothing to be jelous of and get over your obvious smalll man syndrome

Edited by stimmers on Saturday 16th June 17:09
Why so defensive and abusive? can no one else have an opinion,i have lived with both Audi and BMW so in that respect i do know what i'm talking about...........but this is what forums are for, to discuss different views little man.Oh and JEALOUS has an A in it.
Abusive? Have you read your initial post to me? You had the nerve to suggest im the clown? How old are you, about 5?

PS - If i make a typo on a computer, im really not going to lose sleep over it. Just wondering if your going to point out everyones spelling mistakes on this thread, including your own, or just mine?

I won't be wasting anymore of my time responding to your random, strange and ironic comments. So knock yourself out

Edited by stimmers on Sunday 17th June 12:31
Like i said ..................clown

stimmers

2,312 posts

204 months

Sunday 17th June 2007
quotequote all
He is not only dull himself, he is the cause of dullness in others

squeezebm

2,319 posts

206 months

Sunday 17th June 2007
quotequote all
stimmers said:
He is not only dull himself, he is the cause of dullness in others
Clown.

Crimp a Length

5,697 posts

224 months

Monday 18th June 2007
quotequote all
Zod said:
Crimp a Length said:
At the end of the day its an M3, the image was lost a long time ago, whether its a coupe/saloon/convertible/estate, it will look the same as the rest of the new 3 series, bloody boring, at least Audi's have a classier image, and the bottom line is they look a million dollars compared with a Beemer no one can argue with that.
Fast saloon/estate/conv = RS4
If its gotta be a beemer then M5 anyday, just put a paper bag over yer head! paperbag

Edited by Crimp a Length on Friday 15th June 19:23
rolleyes If you want to come in here and troll, at least learn to spell.
Typical a little typo error is the only thing you can jump on.
Just checked yer profile that explains it, a fecking solicitor, money for being corrupt, and an M5paperbag on top of that.........gets worse!
I'll step back into Germanys finest thankyou. loser

alex_123_fra

355 posts

237 months

Monday 18th June 2007
quotequote all
squeezebm said:
alex_123_fra said:
MK4 Slowride said:
You might think Audi are building better engines but the proof's in the pudding, BMW have won numerous consecutive engineering awards for their engines, Audi haven't. Also to have a good interior you have to spend that bit extra on leather instead of cloth, and you need to decide on what type of leather as well.
I don't think audi need to prove their engine build quality/performance and reliability to anyone. Le mans has been testament to this for years...including this year too most probably.

As far as build quality of the interior (as well as remainder of the car), my experience is in comparing the E46 M3 with the B7 RS4. Frankly I have seen constipated turds built more solidly than my M3 (which was bought with only 2,500 miles on the clock). The bodywork/gapping/joins and interior were awful. Plastics were cheap. Leather was of rubbish quality.

The E90 M3 has a LOT of work to do even keep on par with a B7 RS4. That plus the fact that within half a year, there will be a complete flood of them everywhere (made worse by the addition of the saloon). If it really turns out to be a good car, I'd save your money and buy a low milleage used example in about half a year.
The fact is,it has taken Audi 4/5 years in there various RS forms to eventually catch BMW's M3,and now they have surpassed the M3 with there new brilliant RS4!!! Oh bugger,the new M3's out in Sept......well at least it will give Audi something to aim @ again.

Edited by squeezebm on Saturday 16th June 23:53


Edited by squeezebm on Saturday 16th June 23:55
Oh dear, shows how much you actually know about rival manufacturer's production line-ups. Audi have not been trying to "copy" the M3 in any way shape or form. The B4 RS2 and B5 RS4 were avants and designed as such in RS form. The C5 RS6/RS6+ was produced in avant and saloon form and was a natural rival to the E39 M5...and as such dumped on the M5 from quite a height (around 10 seconds faster around the nurburgring).

Even the RS4 was not actually designed to be a "rival" to the E46 M3. It is a fast saloon/avant/carbiolet rather than a sports coupe (M3). BMW are the ones who then crapped themselves and went and made the new M3 with (conveniently) identical power (although inferior torque) to the 4.2 Ltr V8 FSI engine. Oh and talk about copycats...there is now a new M3 estate and saloon being released!!...surprise.

If you want to talk direct rivals to the new M3, the forthcoming RS5 (coupe) is a much better bet...and as such, will doubtless put the M3 to shame in all departments.

Audi do their own thing...their RS models (which are produced in limited numbers) don't hope to steal much of the over-mass-produced M3/M5 equivalent market and appeal to different types of drivers.

waremark

3,242 posts

214 months

Tuesday 19th June 2007
quotequote all
alex_123_fra said:
Audi do their own thing...their RS models (which are produced in limited numbers) don't hope to steal much of the over-mass-produced M3/M5 equivalent market and appeal to different types of drivers.
Surely not - just look at this discussion! I am vaguely considering an RS5 as an alternative to the E90, to replace my E46. Personally I prefer the look and feel of BM's to Audi's both inside and out, and I like that the BM manages to have more space inside a shorter car. Maybe I should get an RS4, but I hate that Audi so often bring these sporting versions out towards the end of the base model's life - it will look outdated within 5 minutes.

So far as 4wd versus rwd goes, I expect the rwd car to put more power down on a dry road, the 4wd on a wet road. I have owned C4 and Evo in the past, but I have never felt the need for 4wd traction in the E46 - perhaps because I tend to be rather prudent in the wet.

Anyway, it will probably be the M3 again for me. My biggest question is which gearbox to choose. What have any of you heard about the dual clutch gearbox, and when do you think it will first be possible to try one? I put my deposit down a couple of years ago, but think I want to try the new gearbox before deciding, so I don't suppose I can hope to have the car before this time next year.

Personally, I think it will be a winner, and early cars will hold their values very well for a while.

MK4 Slowride

10,028 posts

209 months

Tuesday 19th June 2007
quotequote all
squeezebm said:
alex_123_fra said:
MK4 Slowride said:
You might think Audi are building better engines but the proof's in the pudding, BMW have won numerous consecutive engineering awards for their engines, Audi haven't. Also to have a good interior you have to spend that bit extra on leather instead of cloth, and you need to decide on what type of leather as well.
I don't think audi need to prove their engine build quality/performance and reliability to anyone. Le mans has been testament to this for years...including this year too most probably.

As far as build quality of the interior (as well as remainder of the car), my experience is in comparing the E46 M3 with the B7 RS4. Frankly I have seen constipated turds built more solidly than my M3 (which was bought with only 2,500 miles on the clock). The bodywork/gapping/joins and interior were awful. Plastics were cheap. Leather was of rubbish quality.

The E90 M3 has a LOT of work to do even keep on par with a B7 RS4. That plus the fact that within half a year, there will be a complete flood of them everywhere (made worse by the addition of the saloon). If it really turns out to be a good car, I'd save your money and buy a low milleage used example in about half a year.
The fact is,it has taken Audi 4/5 years in there various RS forms to eventually catch BMW's M3,and now they have surpassed the M3 with there new brilliant RS4!!! Oh bugger,the new M3's out in Sept......well at least it will give Audi something to aim @ again.

Edited by squeezebm on Saturday 16th June 23:53


Edited by squeezebm on Saturday 16th June 23:55
We're forgetting the fact the the E46 M3 had the New S4 in a straight line drag race. This is especially good when considering:- Audi has 2 extra cylinders and 1000CC more than the BMW yet only puts out 1HP more. Also like's been said the new M3's out in spet so Audi are back to square 1.

GravelBen

15,694 posts

231 months

Tuesday 19th June 2007
quotequote all
MK4 Slowride said:
We're forgetting the fact the the E46 M3 had the New S4 in a straight line drag race. This is especially good when considering:- Audi has 2 extra cylinders and 1000CC more than the BMW yet only puts out 1HP more. Also like's been said the new M3's out in spet so Audi are back to square 1.
I would think the S4 is more comparable to the 335i than the M3 in terms of its place in the lineup. When the M3 is compared to the RS4 it doesn't seem so good...


Really its a bit like the Scoob vs Evo thing - they're both great cars without that much between them in performance at any time, some years one will be 'better', some years the other will. And some people still manage to develop such an obsession that they refuse to accept the merit of the other car, bowing fervently before the altar of their chosen car before rushing out to do battle with similar fans of the 'other' brand, with their fingers blocking their ears shouting "mines better than yours". And its all pretty lame and boring really. sleep


ETA: did I offend anyone?

Edited by GravelBen on Tuesday 19th June 10:42

Pugsey

5,813 posts

215 months

Tuesday 19th June 2007
quotequote all
GravelBen said:
MK4 Slowride said:
We're forgetting the fact the the E46 M3 had the New S4 in a straight line drag race. This is especially good when considering:- Audi has 2 extra cylinders and 1000CC more than the BMW yet only puts out 1HP more. Also like's been said the new M3's out in spet so Audi are back to square 1.
I would think the S4 is more comparable to the 335i than the M3 in terms of its place in the lineup. When the M3 is compared to the RS4 it doesn't seem so good...


Really its a bit like the Scoob vs Evo thing - they're both great cars without that much between them in performance at any time, some years one will be 'better', some years the other will. And some people still manage to develop such an obsession that they refuse to accept the merit of the other car, bowing fervently before the altar of their chosen car before rushing out to do battle with similar fans of the 'other' brand, with their fingers blocking their ears shouting "mines better than yours". And its all pretty lame and boring really. sleep


ETA: did I offend anyone?

Edited by GravelBen on Tuesday 19th June 10:42
Excellent post. I'm getting a new M3 because I'm sure it will be a superb car and I'd like to own one for a while. If Audi bring out a 'better' car good for them and anyone who buys it. For what ever reason - who knows why, it's a personal thing like which colour you prefer - I'm drawn more to the M3 than the RS4. Doesn't mean I'm 'right' or 'wrong'. I had a 997S then changed to an AMV8 which wasn't strictly as 'good' but I loved it more. Then had a 997GT3 and when that went got a MK2 ClioV6 to run around in while I wait for my AMV8 Roadster. The Clio isn't that quick and has only average handling IMO but I LOVE it and won't be selling. I'm trying to say in a very long winded way that most cars today are bloody good withh very little between them on road in the real world so lets just discuss their reletive merits without coming over all angsty. They're only cars after all!

squeezebm

2,319 posts

206 months

Tuesday 19th June 2007
quotequote all
alex_123_fra said:
squeezebm said:
alex_123_fra said:
MK4 Slowride said:
You might think Audi are building better engines but the proof's in the pudding, BMW have won numerous consecutive engineering awards for their engines, Audi haven't. Also to have a good interior you have to spend that bit extra on leather instead of cloth, and you need to decide on what type of leather as well.
I don't think audi need to prove their engine build quality/performance and reliability to anyone. Le mans has been testament to this for years...including this year too most probably.

As far as build quality of the interior (as well as remainder of the car), my experience is in comparing the E46 M3 with the B7 RS4. Frankly I have seen constipated turds built more solidly than my M3 (which was bought with only 2,500 miles on the clock). The bodywork/gapping/joins and interior were awful. Plastics were cheap. Leather was of rubbish quality.

The E90 M3 has a LOT of work to do even keep on par with a B7 RS4. That plus the fact that within half a year, there will be a complete flood of them everywhere (made worse by the addition of the saloon). If it really turns out to be a good car, I'd save your money and buy a low milleage used example in about half a year.
The fact is,it has taken Audi 4/5 years in there various RS forms to eventually catch BMW's M3,and now they have surpassed the M3 with there new brilliant RS4!!! Oh bugger,the new M3's out in Sept......well at least it will give Audi something to aim @ again.

Edited by squeezebm on Saturday 16th June 23:53


Edited by squeezebm on Saturday 16th June 23:55
Oh dear, shows how much you actually know about rival manufacturer's production line-ups. Audi have not been trying to "copy" the M3 in any way shape or form. The B4 RS2 and B5 RS4 were avants and designed as such in RS form. The C5 RS6/RS6+ was produced in avant and saloon form and was a natural rival to the E39 M5...and as such dumped on the M5 from quite a height (around 10 seconds faster around the nurburgring).

Even the RS4 was not actually designed to be a "rival" to the E46 M3. It is a fast saloon/avant/carbiolet rather than a sports coupe (M3). BMW are the ones who then crapped themselves and went and made the new M3 with (conveniently) identical power (although inferior torque) to the 4.2 Ltr V8 FSI engine. Oh and talk about copycats...there is now a new M3 estate and saloon being released!!...surprise.

If you want to talk direct rivals to the new M3, the forthcoming RS5 (coupe) is a much better bet...and as such, will doubtless put the M3 to shame in all departments.

Audi do their own thing...their RS models (which are produced in limited numbers) don't hope to steal much of the over-mass-produced M3/M5 equivalent market and appeal to different types of drivers.
rS4 NOT designed to rival M3,sorry but have i must have missed something.

Crimp a Length

5,697 posts

224 months

Friday 22nd June 2007
quotequote all
Mate of mine has gotta an 03 M3 all the bits/bells and whistles etc,in other words fully loaded. 40k on clock FSH and wants around 20k for it!!
I'm surprised but he can't shift it, and claims he will lose hand over fist on it.
The residuels on these is poor nowadays isn't it?
I was looking at replacing her indoors car with something a bit more practical to replace the RX8 and thought the M3 would be a reasonable choice as an RS4 which is what she would like (dream on!!) are still mega bucks.
Looked on here and theres 100's for sale, maybe cheaper in the long run to hold onto the RX8? scratchchin
Or land myself a cheap saloon like the M3

taffyracer

2,093 posts

244 months

Saturday 23rd June 2007
quotequote all
So it's lost about 55% of its value over 4 years, doesn't seem too bad to me

MK4 Slowride

10,028 posts

209 months

Saturday 23rd June 2007
quotequote all
Crimp a Length said:
Mate of mine has gotta an 03 M3 all the bits/bells and whistles etc,in other words fully loaded. 40k on clock FSH and wants around 20k for it!!
I'm surprised but he can't shift it, and claims he will lose hand over fist on it.
The residuels on these is poor nowadays isn't it?
I was looking at replacing her indoors car with something a bit more practical to replace the RX8 and thought the M3 would be a reasonable choice as an RS4 which is what she would like (dream on!!) are still mega bucks.
Looked on here and theres 100's for sale, maybe cheaper in the long run to hold onto the RX8? scratchchin
Or land myself a cheap saloon like the M3
03-M3 FSH full loaded with 40K will be worht at least £25,000. Had a mate who sold his individual M3 with 52,000 miles for £20,000.

m12_nathan

5,138 posts

260 months

Saturday 23rd June 2007
quotequote all
Is now a good time to point out that 4wd is gay?

taffyracer

2,093 posts

244 months

Saturday 23rd June 2007
quotequote all
Just sold mine, 48000 miles, june 04, lots of kit, 24,000 p/ex, paid 36,000 with 3k on the clock so £12,000 over 2 years and 45,000 miles is ok for a car of this sort