Interesting Vid - CSL vs RS4

Interesting Vid - CSL vs RS4

Author
Discussion

Beemer-5

7,897 posts

215 months

Sunday 4th March 2007
quotequote all
As a purely performance car, surely the CSL is the real deal of the two?



Doctor, which 4wd car do you have and what power does it have?

DoctorD

Original Poster:

1,542 posts

257 months

Sunday 4th March 2007
quotequote all
Beemer-5 said:

Doctor, which 4wd car do you have and what power does it have?



An AMG ML63, which has just under 510bhp (but easily tunable for another 30bhp more). It's the only 4WD car I've owned that spins its wheels on damp tarmac..

Beemer-5

7,897 posts

215 months

Sunday 4th March 2007
quotequote all
They are about 2400 kgs aren't they, Doc?

Fun though, i bet.

DoctorD

Original Poster:

1,542 posts

257 months

Sunday 4th March 2007
quotequote all
From what I understand from good journalist friends of mine the RS4 is actually quite a fun car to drive day-to-day, so not the usual understeer oriented 4WD fare.

But I really do feel sorry for people who believe that having 4WD is the only way you can travel quickly or have fun in the wet. I was browsing through the forum RS6.com and came across a thread about the new M3 with one of the leading members stating the following "..To me it will be like so many rwd sportscar a one trick pony, entertaining but only in the dry.".

Sad isn't it. They're missing out on so many great sports cars because they've convinced themselves that RWD is dangerous. There must be a whole generation of younger drivers who have never experienced the pleasure of balancing a chassis on the limit ... using their right foot. Instead they've risen up through a series of FWD cars and hold tightly to the perceived safety net of 4WD like a novice swimmer clings to the side of a swimming pool.

DoctorD

Original Poster:

1,542 posts

257 months

Sunday 4th March 2007
quotequote all
Beemer-5 said:
They are about 2400 kgs aren't they, Doc?

Fun though, i bet.


Actually, only just over 2100kg (not that I'm splitting hairs over a few hundred kilos...)

Beemer-5

7,897 posts

215 months

Sunday 4th March 2007
quotequote all
I just checked, it varies from 2310kgs (Mercedes' figure) to 2370kgs (two road tests' figures).
Great power figure, but that sort of weight will dumb down the performance quite a lot, i guess.

nickyandsi

542 posts

207 months

Sunday 4th March 2007
quotequote all
bromers2 said:
nickyandsi said:
http://forum.evotechnik.net/showthrea Interesting bit of BMW driving laugh


Interesting Audi driving - www.pistonheads.co.uk/gassing/topic.asp?t=363135&f=23&h=0

Stuff your 4WD in the rain and snow - RWD is tonnes more fun, don't care if you're 0.01sec quicker I'll have a bigger smile on my face


Think this was driver error perhaps

m3evo2

2,064 posts

209 months

Sunday 4th March 2007
quotequote all
and the CSL wasnt?

Beemer-5

7,897 posts

215 months

Sunday 4th March 2007
quotequote all
TBH if i wanted an Uber-saloon i would get an M5 V10 and give it 550 bhp with a remap and exhaust swap.


Edited by Beemer-5 on Sunday 4th March 21:24

DoctorD

Original Poster:

1,542 posts

257 months

Sunday 4th March 2007
quotequote all
Beemer-5 said:
I just checked, it varies from 2310kgs (Mercedes' figure) to 2370kgs (two road tests' figures).
Great power figure, but that sort of weight will dumb down the performance quite a lot, i guess.


Off topic - but that's not how much the car actually weighs, that figure includes 70 litres of fuel, a driver and some luggage (i.e. an extra 150kg or so). Most manufacturers quote vehicle weights without taking these into consideration - hence the reason why you cannot compare manufacturer quoted unladed weights of Porsche & Audi etc with those of BMW or Mercedes.

Same problem arises when comparing the carrying capacity of vehicles, Land Rover for instance quotes luggage capacity from floor to ceiling whilst most other manufacturers only quote from floor to luggage cover.

Anyway, back on topic...

m12_nathan

5,138 posts

260 months

Sunday 4th March 2007
quotequote all
Off topic but I went out in the rain earier with cup tyres on and I couldn't care less if any other car would be quicker as I had a great time with dangerous RWD

m3evo2

2,064 posts

209 months

Sunday 4th March 2007
quotequote all
m12_nathan said:
Off topic but I went out in the rain earier with cup tyres on and I couldn't care less if any other car would be quicker as I had a great time with dangerous RWD


I bet you did thumbup

nickyandsi

542 posts

207 months

Sunday 4th March 2007
quotequote all
The CSL was possible driver error.,but i am bored now.It seems on here its whoever shouts the loudest,not that each person has an individual opinion.

m3evo2

2,064 posts

209 months

Sunday 4th March 2007
quotequote all
nickyandsi said:
The CSL was possible driver error.,but i am bored now.It seems on here its whoever shouts the loudest,not that each person has an individual opinion.


If it wasnt driver error what was it?

Beemer-5

7,897 posts

215 months

Monday 5th March 2007
quotequote all
Nicky, like i said, the RS4 is a great car. It has the sort of power a Ferrari 355 can't match, after all.
But if you come onto a CSL forum saying that the semi-luxobarge is a generally faster car and (at least give the impression) that you honestly believe it to be the better sportster then you'll get ragged.
It would be like me going on the Audi forum and saying that my CSL is just as comfortable and well equipped as the RS4.
OK i am overstating it, but the point's there.

nickyandsi

542 posts

207 months

Monday 5th March 2007
quotequote all
I agree in a way,but then again theres no point to the video shown because the cars are not of the same standard,in terms of weight and everything else.Its like putting a stripped down RS6 against a fully loaded M5,unfair,and a bit ridiculous. I aint saying no more on this page,cos theres no point byebye

m3evo2

2,064 posts

209 months

Monday 5th March 2007
quotequote all
nickyandsi said:
I agree in a way,but then again theres no point to the video shown because the cars are not of the same standard,in terms of weight and everything else.Its like putting a stripped down RS6 against a fully loaded M5,unfair,and a bit ridiculous. I aint saying no more on this page,cos theres no point byebye


Oh you agree at last, I knew I'd get there in the end biglaugh

nickyandsi

542 posts

207 months

Monday 5th March 2007
quotequote all
Dont you have a job to go to !!!!

m3evo2

2,064 posts

209 months

Monday 5th March 2007
quotequote all
actually no thumbup

nickyandsi

542 posts

207 months

Monday 5th March 2007
quotequote all
Thought as much