Jag V6 in MX5

Author
Discussion

feef

5,206 posts

183 months

Wednesday 26th August 2015
quotequote all
With all these significant increases in power from engine swaps, whether it's a Jag V6 or an LS[n], what do folk do to retain the torsional stiffness from the PPF? Adding stiffening arms to the bulkhead and inner wings, and some subframe stuff is fair enough, but the rest of the chassis is left to handle, not only an increase in power, but quite a rise in torque without a PPF to assist it

Or is some form of PPF installed as part of the build?

I think it's the sort of thing that, over time and with fatigue/stressing from the increased torque might have some detrimental effects, but I'm wondering how much

Any thoughts?

Oldandslow

2,405 posts

206 months

Thursday 27th August 2015
quotequote all
Don't worry, be happy.

PPF usually considered way over the top. Ladder braces can fill the void.

feef

5,206 posts

183 months

Thursday 27th August 2015
quotequote all
Oldandslow said:
Don't worry, be happy.

PPF usually considered way over the top. Ladder braces can fill the void.
I like over-the-top, it suits my engineering style smile

Gilhooligan

2,214 posts

144 months

Thursday 27th August 2015
quotequote all
feef said:
Oldandslow said:
Don't worry, be happy.

PPF usually considered way over the top. Ladder braces can fill the void.
I like over-the-top, it suits my
engineering style smile
Same. There's other engine swap builds that have managed to retain the PPF. V6 mx5 does sound like an epic car though. Good effort OP.

dxg

8,202 posts

260 months

Thursday 27th August 2015
quotequote all
Gilhooligan said:
feef said:
Oldandslow said:
Don't worry, be happy.

PPF usually considered way over the top. Ladder braces can fill the void.
I like over-the-top, it suits my
engineering style smile
Same. There's other engine swap builds that have managed to retain the PPF. V6 mx5 does sound like an epic car though. Good effort OP.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmffKP1grL4

StangGT

3,925 posts

269 months

Saturday 5th December 2015
quotequote all
Any update on this at all?

Flying Phil

1,585 posts

145 months

Thursday 24th December 2015
quotequote all
Just catching up on this and am feeling puzzled - what is a /the PPF? (I've done engine swaps in other cars with an added roll cage or big reinforcement in the sills)

feef

5,206 posts

183 months

Thursday 24th December 2015
quotequote all
Flying Phil said:
Just catching up on this and am feeling puzzled - what is a /the PPF? (I've done engine swaps in other cars with an added roll cage or big reinforcement in the sills)
PPF : Power Plant Frame

it's this girder that connects the engine/gearbox to the diff to help reduce forces being transmitted to the chassis


Audipardonner

544 posts

195 months

Sunday 14th August 2016
quotequote all
oilburner said:
Hi Tracker Jack. Glad you liked the MXV6. The plan is to be able provide a kit of parts to enable people like yourself to build one just like it. Everything you need to do the conversion in a weekend including a plug and play ECU. You'll just need to source yourself an engine of which there are plenty. Watch this space!
Hi, Did you ever get any further with this? I'm toying with putting a Jag V6 manual in my MX5 but also considering the V8, although I understand a manual box with these is difficult/impossible and/or bloody expensive!

Audipardonner

544 posts

195 months

Sunday 14th August 2016
quotequote all
feef said:
With all these significant increases in power from engine swaps, whether it's a Jag V6 or an LS[n], what do folk do to retain the torsional stiffness from the PPF? Adding stiffening arms to the bulkhead and inner wings, and some subframe stuff is fair enough, but the rest of the chassis is left to handle, not only an increase in power, but quite a rise in torque without a PPF to assist it

Or is some form of PPF installed as part of the build?

I think it's the sort of thing that, over time and with fatigue/stressing from the increased torque might have some detrimental effects, but I'm wondering how much

Any thoughts?
I don't believe the 'PPF' (power plant frame) contributes any significant torsional strength to the overall chassis/body unit. It is simply there as a convenient way to fix the engine/gearbox and front suspension units together with the rear axle and suspension to maintain alignment before the body is dropped on top, temporarily providing a rather weak sort of rolling chassis during production. It may provide some longitudinal bracing between the gearbox and differential but its design means it is bound to flex. The torsional stiffness of the MX5 is provided entirely by the bodyshell. Of course, useful improvements to torsional resistance can always be provided by adding frames or strengthening the sills and bulkheads.

OSR

349 posts

213 months

Tuesday 16th August 2016
quotequote all
As an alternative you could put a Mazda V6 in.
Check out http://crapengineering.weebly.com/
They do sound awesome with a V6 in and a decent exhaust.

VladD

7,855 posts

265 months

Tuesday 16th August 2016
quotequote all

VladD

7,855 posts

265 months

Tuesday 16th August 2016
quotequote all
Paddy_N_Murphy said:
VladD said:
That, sounds like the job !
Sourcing an engine in the UK could be tricky.

SmilerFTM

829 posts

150 months

Tuesday 16th August 2016
quotequote all
VladD said:
Sourcing an engine in the UK could be tricky.
I'd imagine you could get one easy enough from the US and ship it over.

Oldandslow

2,405 posts

206 months

Tuesday 16th August 2016
quotequote all

VladD

7,855 posts

265 months

Tuesday 16th August 2016
quotequote all
Oldandslow said:
Thaat would do it I'd imagine.

AndrewEH1

4,917 posts

153 months

Wednesday 16th November 2016
quotequote all

feef

5,206 posts

183 months

Thursday 17th November 2016
quotequote all
not THAT bad considering the work that goes into it.

I'm waiting to get my welder back from being repaired/serviced so I can get on with my V8 build.

sjg

7,452 posts

265 months

Thursday 17th November 2016
quotequote all
Found this via that carthrottle video - looks great.

For comparison, if you called Flyin Miata and bought all the parts for a LS conversion (minus engine/box) it would be about $15k. I imagine a LS is rather more expensive to get your hands on than a Jaguar 3.0 too, it's not like we have scrapyards full of GM V8 cars to get them from.

feef

5,206 posts

183 months

Thursday 17th November 2016
quotequote all
sjg said:
Found this via that carthrottle video - looks great.

For comparison, if you called Flyin Miata and bought all the parts for a LS conversion (minus engine/box) it would be about $15k. I imagine a LS is rather more expensive to get your hands on than a Jaguar 3.0 too, it's not like we have scrapyards full of GM V8 cars to get them from.
You don't 'need' to go down the LS route tho.

So far I've spent:

1UZ engine (4.0 quad cam V8): £350
Toyota W58 gearbox : £300
gearbox conversion kit : £700
Subframe : £300

Exhaust system : £TBA
I already have a standaone ECU and 1UZ loom so the bulk of the components are there for under £2k.

The more valuable component of that £6k price tag is the time spent and experience gained in making it all fit and work together. Something I'm happy doing, and will fabricate brackets and whatnot, but not everyone has the ability or tooling to make such parts so a plug-and-play solution is worth looking at.

If you were to buy a machine-shop worth of tools to fabricate the parts you need, you'd need more than £6k, and that's before you factor in the time spent dropping the engine in, out, in out, and waving it all about while you work out what goes where.