Fuel Economy...

Author
Discussion

CTE

1,488 posts

241 months

Thursday 4th December 2008
quotequote all
I have been considering an MX5 2.0ltr (new type) for a daily driver, but having read this thread, I am not so sure now...I can`t believe how poor the real world consumption figures are for what are hardly the quickest cars on the road. I do not expect good consumption when belting around, but I would expect a small light modern 2.0ltr to achieve at least high 30`s on a run on a dual carriage way type journey at 75-80mph? It sounds like they are no better than a Z4 3.0ltr in similar touring conditions? Anyone know any different?

Howard-

4,952 posts

203 months

Thursday 4th December 2008
quotequote all
CTE said:
but I would expect a small light modern 2.0ltr to achieve at least high 30`s on a run on a dual carriage way type journey at 75-80mph?
It will, if you're keeping a constant speed and not in traffic, speeding up/slowing down etc

MX-5 Lazza

7,952 posts

220 months

Thursday 4th December 2008
quotequote all
A Mk3 2.0 is a completely different car from what we've all been talking about. I don't think anyone has mentioned economy from a Mk3 yet. As it's a more modern design with a modern engine based on the Ford Duratec (which itself is based on a Mazda design) so I'd expect it to be a bit more economical than the old 1.8 & 1.6 engines, especially on a run.

ali_kat

31,993 posts

222 months

Thursday 4th December 2008
quotequote all
Howard- said:
CTE said:
but I would expect a small light modern 2.0ltr to achieve at least high 30`s on a run on a dual carriage way type journey at 75-80mph?
It will, if you're keeping a constant speed and not in traffic, speeding up/slowing down etc
yes I gave my average overleaf for a Mk2.5 1.8i, that is my daily driver, for 18 miles round trip into the City Centre and back again (stop/start traffic all the way). I consider that figure (31mpg) to be blooming excellent biggrin

OllieWinchester

5,655 posts

193 months

Thursday 4th December 2008
quotequote all
How big is the tank on a Mk1 Eunos? I usually get about 38 litres in, so I'm assuming its a 40 litre tank. I normally get about 350Km's to a tank, which equates to approximately 220 miles. If 40 litres is equal to 8.7 UK Gallons then I reckon I'm getting 25mpg, which is not great. The key is keeping the revs below 4k apparently, trouble is I keep giving it the juice to hear the induction noise....

FELIX_5

952 posts

198 months

Thursday 4th December 2008
quotequote all
Why are we even having this debate?!!!!!!! You don't buy an MX-5 for its economy, you buy it to have fun in it!!!! Fuel econmy depends on so many things, the price of fuel, where you fill up (as in geographical location), your driving style and the conditions in which you drive!! These debates really bug me as they are tottaly pointless! Of course MPG figures are going to fluctuate as nobody drives exactly the same route in the same way or has exactly the same car. I'm sorry to have a rant, but this topic keeps getting replies, lets have a more interesting topic and put this to bed. If you are bothered about MPG go and buy a hybrid car. (I know I'm going to get lynched for this and it isn't a dig at anyone in particular!) soapbox

rfn

Original Poster:

4,531 posts

208 months

Thursday 4th December 2008
quotequote all
Thanks for your thoughts Aiden.

Strangely enough, MPG is important to some people, just perhaps not you!! I've driven a diesel car since I passed my test and I have been doing galactic mileages since and so economy is important to me. I needed to budget whether the increase in fuel costs would be particularly problematic for me in terms of yearly cost, and that's why I posted this topic.

Of course, as you say, everyone is going to get different figures, but if I can see what other people are getting I can then see a rough range of what I could expect. I've wanted an MX-5 since I first went in the Eunos my Dad borrowed when I was 7, and I've waited long enough, but I don't want to throw away money if it isn't economical viable smile.

FELIX_5

952 posts

198 months

Thursday 4th December 2008
quotequote all
I take your point. Which is exactly why I have a Citroen Xantia Diesel as my 'everyday car' because strangely, I to am bothered about fuel consumption, until I get behind the wheel of my MX-5 that is. I fully understand if you are doing a lot of miles, of couse its going to be a concern, but if its that much of a concern, surely an MX-5 isn't right for you!?

It wasn't your concern about consumption I was getting at anyway, I was merely suggesting it was a waste of time comparing figures because of the number of variables. I'm sorry if you took my comments the wrong way...... smile

rfn

Original Poster:

4,531 posts

208 months

Thursday 4th December 2008
quotequote all
I wish I could afford to drive and insure two vehicles, let alone have space to keep them! An MX-5 is finally in my reach with half-decent insurance quotes (same as my Mondeo) and while my Mondeo is still worth a half-decent sum it makes sense (to me) to change while I don't have to put a cash injection in.

I'm probably going to be doing between 20k and 25k in the next 12 months which is some less than I have done annually in the past. Some people might not think an MX-5 is the sort of car to do that in, and maybe I will find that it's right, in which case I would probably look to change again come spring/summer (I've had four cars in three years anyway!). If it only costs me £150 more a year to run an MX-5 (irrelevant cost when spending £3k p.a. on fuel) then it is worth it IMO smile.

No worries, didn't take your comments any way really, it's always nice to get different peoples opinions and comments on any subject smile.

FELIX_5

952 posts

198 months

Thursday 4th December 2008
quotequote all
Personally I don't think it would be the right car for what you want, whilst I love mine and wouldn't swap it for the world, if I was doing a lot of miles in it, it would be a different story. Whilst they are great fun, on a long journey, they aren't the quietest (quite droney at motorway speed), they aren't packed with creature comforts like your mondeo, and they have relatively small fuel tanks and of course not the most economical. But everyone is different, you may like it. If you get one, hope you get a good one, and enjoy it! They are great cars and I completely understand why you want one! thumbup

Snoggledog

7,074 posts

218 months

Thursday 4th December 2008
quotequote all
OllieWinchester said:
How big is the tank on a Mk1 Eunos? I usually get about 38 litres in, so I'm assuming its a 40 litre tank. I normally get about 350Km's to a tank, which equates to approximately 220 miles. If 40 litres is equal to 8.7 UK Gallons then I reckon I'm getting 25mpg, which is not great. The key is keeping the revs below 4k apparently, trouble is I keep giving it the juice to hear the induction noise....
Glad I'm not the only one getting poor MPG's.

MX-5 Lazza

7,952 posts

220 months

Thursday 4th December 2008
quotequote all
Ok, as a direct comparison, I usually do my daily drudge in my 1.8 Zetec Focus (petrol) and I always get 33mpg regardless of how I drive. In my (modified) Mk2.5 1.8 Sport I get between 25 & 28mpg driving exactly the same roads at the same speeds.

Personally I think an MX5 is fine for those sorts of mileages but a Mk2/2.5 1.8 with 6-speed gearbox would be best. Give it a try and if you don't like it sell it and get a diesel hatch.

Edited by MX-5 Lazza on Thursday 4th December 16:46

Howard-

4,952 posts

203 months

Friday 5th December 2008
quotequote all
I couldn't care less about the MPG my MX5 returns, I didn't buy it for it's economy, it's just interesting to discuss what we do get in various scenarios smile


I'm not that fussed when "daily-driving", either. My Accord returns 31MPG average, yet it's a very cheap car to run wink



FELIX_5 said:
Personally I don't think it would be the right car for what you want, whilst I love mine and wouldn't swap it for the world, if I was doing a lot of miles in it, it would be a different story. Whilst they are great fun, on a long journey, they aren't the quietest (quite droney at motorway speed), they aren't packed with creature comforts like your mondeo, and they have relatively small fuel tanks and of course not the most economical. But everyone is different, you may like it. If you get one, hope you get a good one, and enjoy it! They are great cars and I completely understand why you want one! thumbup
I'm going to have to agree

Edited by Howard- on Friday 5th December 08:08

YZF600R

4,121 posts

209 months

Friday 5th December 2008
quotequote all
My daily driver is a lot less economical than the MX5! I tend to get about 20-22mpg from it. Mind you, it is a big heavy barge.

rfn

Original Poster:

4,531 posts

208 months

Saturday 6th December 2008
quotequote all
Cheers for all the thoughts guys/gals smile.

Much appreciated! At the moment the Mondeo is for sale, if I get no interest then I may keep it for another 12 months and then get an MX-5 when my mileage has dropped a bit, we shall see. Cheers again smile.

rfn

Original Poster:

4,531 posts

208 months

Thursday 29th January 2009
quotequote all
Just thought I'd add some numbers by way of a reply to this thread...

I've had the MX for a little over five weeks and have managed to clock up 2,500 miles in it. A few trips up and down the M40 and some commuting to Cheltenham during the week has attributed to this. I'm still loving driving the car even on the motorway, and finding it has a surprising amount of pull from 70 in 6th considering it's lack of torque compared to the diesel Mondeo that went before it.

Current long-term average fuel economy is 33.9mpg, and it is fair to say I haven't been hanging around. I have been getting to know the car so I certainly haven't been on an "economy drive". Last tank just recorded a 35.4mpg average though this was primarily motorway (cruising at 0.8ish leptons) with a light sprinkling of town driving (More info is available on my profile...)

Is this the car for me?
The answer to this question is most definately YES! Even though I haven't had the roof down since the first day (hard top on) I am still finding it an event driving it on a day to day basis. I'm am willing to admit it isn't such a good motorway cruiser as the Mondeo, but there is actually less road noise and it feels nice and planted.

Can't wait for the summer to arrive now! A gratuitous photo:



Rob13

7,820 posts

225 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
very nice, come the summer you'll have an even bigger grin!

Im in the process of sorting mine ready for summer.

franv8

2,212 posts

239 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
As for the importance of fuel economy:

I think it's become important to the majority of us when we find it's suddenly costing well over £1 a litre for fuel.

Economy can be a good gauge of how a similar engine is running compared to another, good example on the early MX5's is that there's no check engine light, so often you only find it can't read the O2 sensor because you've lost 5mpg.

I bought my MX5 as my economy daily runabout. Alas I'd say at 27-30mpg (ranging from trying to break it to super eco 20 car queue behind driving) I'm a little surprised it isn't a little less thirsty, but it is less thirsty than the other car at anything between 14 and 20 mpg..

Putitng on a really sad anorak, I do think there's a little sport in seeing the best economy you cna get out of your car - the American's seem to like ot call this 'hypermiling' - something to make the commute to work interesting for a couple of weeks anyway! (BTW this is about trying to better the economy on your own vehicle, i.e. best improvement over 'normal' factory mileage).

One last point, I think over the last couple of years the car scene has become blighted by less exciting subjects, I'm currently unbelievably bored by the other forum I tended to hang around in on here - since now instead of 'how's your car going' and 'look at this' threads, it's now become all about the resale of the latest variant, how to reprogram your sat nav and how someone doesn't like the latest factory special edition stickers. Grrr!

OllieWinchester

5,655 posts

193 months

Monday 2nd February 2009
quotequote all
Up to 28.5 MPG on my last tank, but there was more than usual motorway work. Mk1 1.6, probably needs a service.

little gem

5 posts

183 months

Tuesday 3rd February 2009
quotequote all
Only had my 5 for 3 weeks and the first tank was just over 37 to the gallon. No doubt that will change in time.

woohoo