Mk 1 MX5 as a track car

Author
Discussion

Herman Toothrot

6,702 posts

199 months

Wednesday 24th December 2008
quotequote all
Hornet goes suprisingly well for a non turbo or supercharged 1.6 I had a ride at Abingdon in the summer and was suprised. Talking carrying speed through bends its drivers that day though it not possible to carry the same sort of speeds through the bends as my car. The cars both have the same WIM alignments, same size tyres and wheels only major difference I could think of was Torsen LSD in my car, maybe a 1.8 diff could be a good upgrade. Also make it a bit more fun to slide?

Edited by Herman Toothrot on Wednesday 24th December 11:50

wheels-inmotion

58 posts

208 months

Saturday 27th December 2008
quotequote all
Working alongside the ABs suspension install the Hornet has a full blown wim track Geometry calibration, whereas all past calibrations were fast road.

Herman Toothrot

6,702 posts

199 months

Saturday 27th December 2008
quotequote all
wheels-inmotion said:
Working alongside the ABs suspension install the Hornet has a full blown wim track Geometry calibration, whereas all past calibrations were fast road.
I asked you about Hornets alignment when you did mine you said they were the same, your "fast road" setup. Was that, "at that point" and now you have a "better" or more dedicated MX5 track alignment? My car is track only/ road legal and you set it to your "fast road" you said? You commented on the "really healthy caster angle" that was acheived on my car. If you don't remember it's a black Eunos turbo with P5 Puredrive coilovers, OZ Ultraleggera wheels.

Cheers

Steve




Ab Shocks

1,686 posts

221 months

Sunday 28th December 2008
quotequote all
Back on topic
If anybody can show me a better handling car for trackdays than an MX-5 for the money, I'll eat my hat (if I had one)

Brilliant little cars

MX-5 Lazza

7,952 posts

220 months

Monday 29th December 2008
quotequote all
Mk1 MR2 is just as good but the bodywork doesn't last as well as an MX5.
Modified Mk1/2 Golfs are pretty good too...

Ab Shocks

1,686 posts

221 months

Monday 29th December 2008
quotequote all
Herman Toothrot said:
wheels-inmotion said:
Working alongside the ABs suspension install the Hornet has a full blown wim track Geometry calibration, whereas all past calibrations were fast road.
I asked you about Hornets alignment when you did mine you said they were the same, your "fast road" setup. Was that, "at that point" and now you have a "better" or more dedicated MX5 track alignment? My car is track only/ road legal and you set it to your "fast road" you said? You commented on the "really healthy caster angle" that was acheived on my car. If you don't remember it's a black Eunos turbo with P5 Puredrive coilovers, OZ Ultraleggera wheels.

Cheers

Steve

You will appreciate that I am constantly passing info to Tony on track settings based on Ma5da racing testing sessions and more testing will take place in the Spring.

MX-5 Lazza

7,952 posts

220 months

Monday 29th December 2008
quotequote all
Hornet has been aligned 3 times. Once when we first got it, again after I slid it sideways across the curbing at Curborough and finally after having the Ab Shocks Gaz kit fitted by Wim. All 3 times were done by WiM (one of our most active sponsors). Each time the settings have been slightly tweaked.

ETA: Or was it twice? I can't remember now... confused

Edited by MX-5 Lazza on Tuesday 30th December 09:16

RRH

562 posts

248 months

Monday 23rd March 2009
quotequote all
We run two MX5's on track, exceptionally reliable and fun- as previously stated you can't beat them for the money.

I've been playing with geometry settings for a while now and can't seem to get it right. Can anyone advise me of settings for a dry track?

Both car's are on coilovers with 400lb front / 300lb rear if that's relevant.

WIM seem to have an excellent rep in the Mazda community- its a shame they're so far away from me (in the frozen north).

Thanks.
Simon.

kevham

118 posts

274 months

Monday 23rd March 2009
quotequote all
I don't think you can beat the MX5 as a car you can drive to trackdays, have fun and then drive back home. I've been doing that for best part of 10 years now and neither of my forays into Scoobys or MR2s have been as satisfying.

You just have to accept that it has no grunt and either A) fit forced induction or B) learn to carry more speed or C) just have fun.

As for track geometry settings - some tyre temp data will help you but I think the consensus has headed towards -2deg front camber (but not at the expense of too much caster) and -1.5deg rear camber (yes you read that correctly). Some like a bit of toe out at the front, some like a bit of toe-in at the rear - I haven't decided yet. Getting grip at the front is the challenge as far as I am concerned.

Ab Shocks

1,686 posts

221 months

Monday 23rd March 2009
quotequote all
kevham said:
I think the consensus has headed towards -2deg front camber (but not at the expense of too much caster) and -1.5deg rear camber (yes you read that correctly). Some like a bit of toe out at the front, some like a bit of toe-in at the rear - I haven't decided yet. Getting grip at the front is the challenge as far as I am concerned.
Surely you mean -2deg camber(but not at the expense of not enough caster)

Caster is your friend when looking for a good contact point on the front tyres for grip and toe out wins back caster.

BTW Kev. I think I found the reason for the mega rear camber that some competition drivers use, "unstable rear end under heavy braking" was their reason.

Nobody has suggested that increased rear toe would combat that to some degree and if a massive problem (and a brake bias valve could not be employed) Why not take the 10mm rake off the car?


kevham

118 posts

274 months

Tuesday 24th March 2009
quotequote all
Ab Shocks said:
Surely you mean -2deg camber(but not at the expense of not enough caster)

Caster is your friend when looking for a good contact point on the front tyres for grip and toe out wins back caster.

BTW Kev. I think I found the reason for the mega rear camber that some competition drivers use, "unstable rear end under heavy braking" was their reason.

Nobody has suggested that increased rear toe would combat that to some degree and if a massive problem (and a brake bias valve could not be employed) Why not take the 10mm rake off the car?
Yes my mistake on the caster - when you increase negative camber, you reduce caster and the more caster the better as you say. WIM Tony suggested an absolute minimum of 3.5 degrees caster.

With regard to mega rear end camber guys, maybe their rear spring rates are too high and the rear end is 'lifting' as the weight transfers? Not a problem on my car, for sure. My problem is definitely at the front end.

Chris71

21,536 posts

243 months

Thursday 26th March 2009
quotequote all
Barring the one make race series are there any cheaper competition classes (maybe in sprints or hillclimbs?) for MX5s? A nice informal club chapionship of some description?

kevham

118 posts

274 months

Thursday 26th March 2009
quotequote all
Chris,
The HSA (http://www.hillclimbandsprint.co.uk/default.asp) runs an MX5 specific class with events all over England. No forced induction allowed though. I'm competing and there are five other registered MX5 entrants so far this year.

I also compete in more local championships in the North of England and Scotland but in those I compete against a range of different cars from Peugeot 205 GTI to Lotus Elise etc.

pikeyboy

2,349 posts

215 months

Friday 27th March 2009
quotequote all
kevham said:
Chris,
The HSA (http://www.hillclimbandsprint.co.uk/default.asp) runs an MX5 specific class with events all over England. No forced induction allowed though. I'm competing and there are five other registered MX5 entrants so far this year.

I also compete in more local championships in the North of England and Scotland but in those I compete against a range of different cars from Peugeot 205 GTI to Lotus Elise etc.
I dont suppose you have a link to the website for the MX5 hill climb series do you?, i have my MX5 for sale and although perfect for trackdays with ohlins coilovers, MSA rear cage etc i think i might get more interest if i advertised it on a more specialist site.


MazDave

943 posts

285 months

Friday 27th March 2009
quotequote all
You'll find the HSA here The class for MX5s is A2.1 - Looks like competition will be good this year - I should be back myself soon.

Dave

Chris71

21,536 posts

243 months

Friday 27th March 2009
quotequote all
pikeyboy said:
kevham said:
Chris,
The HSA (http://www.hillclimbandsprint.co.uk/default.asp) runs an MX5 specific class with events all over England. No forced induction allowed though. I'm competing and there are five other registered MX5 entrants so far this year.

I also compete in more local championships in the North of England and Scotland but in those I compete against a range of different cars from Peugeot 205 GTI to Lotus Elise etc.
I dont suppose you have a link to the website for the MX5 hill climb series do you?, i have my MX5 for sale and although perfect for trackdays with ohlins coilovers, MSA rear cage etc i think i might get more interest if i advertised it on a more specialist site.
Have you got a link to 'said car.

Not in the market just yet (unless you have a burning desire to part ex for a TVR S3) but keen to keep an eye on prices and so on for the more track focused '5s.

Wilburo

391 posts

198 months

Friday 27th March 2009
quotequote all
MazDave said:
You'll find the HSA here The class for MX5s is A2.1 - Looks like competition will be good this year - I should be back myself soon.
Dave
I just saw in your profile that you rolled the MX-5 - what happened!?

pikeyboy

2,349 posts

215 months

Friday 27th March 2009
quotequote all
Chris71 said:
pikeyboy said:
kevham said:
Chris,
The HSA (http://www.hillclimbandsprint.co.uk/default.asp) runs an MX5 specific class with events all over England. No forced induction allowed though. I'm competing and there are five other registered MX5 entrants so far this year.

I also compete in more local championships in the North of England and Scotland but in those I compete against a range of different cars from Peugeot 205 GTI to Lotus Elise etc.
I dont suppose you have a link to the website for the MX5 hill climb series do you?, i have my MX5 for sale and although perfect for trackdays with ohlins coilovers, MSA rear cage etc i think i might get more interest if i advertised it on a more specialist site.
Have you got a link to 'said car.

Not in the market just yet (unless you have a burning desire to part ex for a TVR S3) but keen to keep an eye on prices and so on for the more track focused '5s.
yes of course here's the link. http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/910612.htm

MazDave

943 posts

285 months

Friday 27th March 2009
quotequote all
Wilburo said:
MazDave said:
You'll find the HSA here The class for MX5s is A2.1 - Looks like competition will be good this year - I should be back myself soon.
Dave
I just saw in your profile that you rolled the MX-5 - what happened!?
It was a case of commitment being greater than ability I'm afraid. At Goodwood in May last year, too much speed through St Mary's, backwards across the track, into the tyre wall which bounced me back and landed me upside down. Got away with a stiff neck (4 point cage, 6 point harness and race seat helped) but like it says on the back of the tickets "Motorsport can be dangerous".... Definitely don't want to do that again.

Dave

kevham

118 posts

274 months

Saturday 28th March 2009
quotequote all
Dave
It would be good to see you out this year. Another MX5 or something different?