|
matjk
Original Poster
41 posts
9 months
|
|
|
uk_vette
2,766 posts
73 months
|
It could be, You need to get some better photos. You need to see the back of the watch.
They are £23,50 over here in China if you want a few '
And look exactly like that one.
vette
|
|
|
Sheets Tabuer
12,144 posts
84 months
|
No idea but looking at the ridges on the crown I'd ask for my money back.
(not a watch expert)
|
|
|
alanm_3
110 posts
108 months
|
Maybe I'm super cynical, but every time I see a sob story on E-Bay about some family member or other, I immediately smell a rat. That coupled with the convenient lack of papers would have me running a mile from bidding on this.
|
|
|
FunkyChucker
299 posts
60 months
|
Zero feedback seller, avoid.
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
hilly10
818 posts
97 months
|
alanm_3 said: Maybe I'm super cynical, but every time I see a sob story on E-Bay about some family member or other, I immediately smell a rat. That coupled with the convenient lack of papers would have me running a mile from bidding on this. I also concur with the above, sob story etc. Anybody buying a watch like that even a novice would hang on to the box
|
|
|
NeMiSiS
3,695 posts
44 months
|
|
|
andy tims
3,599 posts
115 months
|
FunkyChucker said: Zero feedback seller, avoid. This in any case, but the quality is piss poor too.
|
|
|
Gazzab
15,115 posts
151 months
|
Amazing that anyone bids on such an auction!
|
|
|
Shaw Tarse
19,167 posts
72 months
|
Gazzab said: Amazing that anyone bids on such an auction! I would guess that not all bidders are genuine?
|
|
|
Hard-Drive
1,800 posts
98 months
|
Clasp looks highly suspect to me!
|
|
|
chris56
63 posts
48 months
|
|
|
dingg
631 posts
88 months
|
|
|
Shaw Tarse
19,167 posts
72 months
|
dingg said: faker than Jordans tits I wouldn't touch it with a barge pole!
|
|
|
Adrian W
8,118 posts
97 months
|
Shaw Tarse said: dingg said: faker than Jordans tits I wouldn't touch it with a barge pole! What, Jodans tits?
|
|
|
RobCh
52 posts
48 months
|
Looks very fake. The UPH bezel should have the 60 at top dead centre, not offset. The quality of the number stamping on the bezel looks poor. And the crown and pushers are not as the original watch. The fit of the "shoulder" piece between the lugs also looks second-rate. Given all the other suspicious factors, I would avoid.
|
|
|
Dominic H
2,721 posts
101 months
|
Hard-Drive said: Clasp looks highly suspect to me! Yep, clasp is marked 62523 which is the Rolex part reference for a steel and gold Jubilee bracelet not a steel Oyster. RQ~~60_12.JPG) The watch is described as a ref 116520, and then confirmed as having a Zenith movement!? This fake is intended to resemble a 16520 Rolex Daytona. Avoid like the plague.
|
|
|
DH01
373 posts
37 months
|
For £2,250.00 someone will only get trapped by their greed.
|
|
|
matjk
Original Poster
41 posts
9 months
|
Thanks guys, only asked because its just up the road from me, looked like a s  t copy to me, i will warn him off, wonder what mug has bid on it already, shame you cant warn the bidders like you used to be able to.
|
|
|
matjk
Original Poster
41 posts
9 months
|
Thanks guys, only asked because its just up the road from me, looked like a s  t copy to me, i will warn him off, wonder what mug has bid on it already, shame you cant warn the bidders like you used to be able to.
|
|