Rolex rage

Author
Discussion

Vvroom

1,170 posts

191 months

Tuesday 11th June 2013
quotequote all
EwingJR said:
I still remember people proudly saying "It's a quartz, you know."
I've got a bi-metal OQ 17013 and say this all the time, promptly followed by "but not just any quartz..."

I don't have many friends; as you can tell.

michael gould

5,691 posts

242 months

Tuesday 11th June 2013
quotequote all
EwingJR said:
michael gould said:
I remember my Dad being proud of his Rover !
Oi! My 800 Vitesse coupe was the first decent car I ever bought!

I was very proud of it frown
But that's not the point.........I'm sure many quartz Rolex owners were very proud of their £30 movements.......but not now ......QED the Rover smile

bobbybee

872 posts

155 months

Tuesday 11th June 2013
quotequote all
michael gould said:
EwingJR said:
michael gould said:
I remember my Dad being proud of his Rover !
Oi! My 800 Vitesse coupe was the first decent car I ever bought!

I was very proud of it frown
But that's not the point.........I'm sure many quartz Rolex owners were very proud of their £30 movements.......but not now ......QED the Rover smile
Well no, not really
OQ owners still have a fully functional piece of machinery, most Rovers are long dead by now.
The OQ is growing in popularity as it is one of the rarer Rolex models, and desirable amongst collectors, still fetching around £3,000 - £3,500 depending on condition / completeness
Also the movement is far more than £30, smile

michael gould

5,691 posts

242 months

Tuesday 11th June 2013
quotequote all
bobbybee said:
michael gould said:
EwingJR said:
michael gould said:
I remember my Dad being proud of his Rover !
Oi! My 800 Vitesse coupe was the first decent car I ever bought!

I was very proud of it frown
But that's not the point.........I'm sure many quartz Rolex owners were very proud of their £30 movements.......but not now ......QED the Rover smile
Well no, not really
OQ owners still have a fully functional piece of machinery, most Rovers are long dead by now.
The OQ is growing in popularity as it is one of the rarer Rolex models, and desirable amongst collectors, still fetching around £3,000 - £3,500 depending on condition / completeness
Also the movement is far more than £30, smile
£32 ? smile

Mermaid

21,492 posts

172 months

Wednesday 12th June 2013
quotequote all

Have Rolex prices outstripped house prices?

Perec

26,440 posts

223 months

Wednesday 12th June 2013
quotequote all
Mermaid said:
Have Rolex prices outstripped house prices?
No, I have just checked on Rightmove and generally houses are still more expensive than Rolexes.

AstonZagato

12,731 posts

211 months

Wednesday 12th June 2013
quotequote all
I have always regarded Rolex as being the Porsche 911 of watches. They are fabulous things, well engineered, great at what they do, lovely to look at (and unchanging in style), good residuals. Enthusiasts rightly like them.

However, they also happen to be the default choice for know-nothing cocks trying to impress and demonstrate that they are "considerably richer than yowww".

Perec

26,440 posts

223 months

Wednesday 12th June 2013
quotequote all
AstonZagato said:
I have always regarded Rolex as being the Porsche 911 of watches. They are fabulous things, well engineered, great at what they do, lovely to look at (and unchanging in style), good residuals. Enthusiasts rightly like them.

However, they also happen to be the default choice for know-nothing cocks trying to impress and demonstrate that they are "considerably richer than yowww".
Yes, that about sums them up.

Mermaid

21,492 posts

172 months

Wednesday 12th June 2013
quotequote all
Perec said:
Mermaid said:
Have Rolex prices outstripped house prices?
No, I have just checked on Rightmove and generally houses are still more expensive than Rolexes.
Cheeky wink

House index was 231 in 1970, it is 8623 now, 37 times more

Anyone know how much a Rolex submariner cost in 1970? It is £5700 now. If it was £154 then it has kept pace with house prices. smile

Just found this from that vintage::



Edited by Mermaid on Wednesday 12th June 15:44

Perec

26,440 posts

223 months

Wednesday 12th June 2013
quotequote all
Mermaid said:
Perec said:
Mermaid said:
Have Rolex prices outstripped house prices?
No, I have just checked on Rightmove and generally houses are still more expensive than Rolexes.
Cheeky wink

House index was 231 in 1970, it is 8623 now, 37 times more

Anyone know how much a Rolex submariner cost in 1970? It is £5700 now. If it was £154 then it has kept pace with house prices. smile

Just found this from that vintage::



Edited by Mermaid on Wednesday 12th June 15:44
The non-date is £5k list isn't it?


alanm_3

369 posts

240 months

Wednesday 12th June 2013
quotequote all
$210!!! I'll have several!!

yeti

10,523 posts

276 months

Wednesday 12th June 2013
quotequote all
AstonZagato said:
I have always regarded Rolex as being the Porsche 911 of watches. They are fabulous things, well engineered, great at what they do, lovely to look at (and unchanging in style), good residuals. Enthusiasts rightly like them.

However, they also happen to be the default choice for know-nothing cocks trying to impress and demonstrate that they are "considerably richer than yowww".
+1; dead on

Mermaid

21,492 posts

172 months

Wednesday 12th June 2013
quotequote all
Perec said:
The non-date is £5k list isn't it?
Well spotted beer

jonby

5,357 posts

158 months

Wednesday 12th June 2013
quotequote all
yeti said:
AstonZagato said:
I have always regarded Rolex as being the Porsche 911 of watches. They are fabulous things, well engineered, great at what they do, lovely to look at (and unchanging in style), good residuals. Enthusiasts rightly like them.

However, they also happen to be the default choice for know-nothing cocks trying to impress and demonstrate that they are "considerably richer than yowww".
+1; dead on
that's three of us in agreement then

Is it a co-incidence that we are also all Aston owners I wonder

Mermaid

21,492 posts

172 months

Wednesday 12th June 2013
quotequote all
AstonZagato said:
I have always regarded Rolex as being the Porsche 911 of watches. They are fabulous things, well engineered, great at what they do, lovely to look at (and unchanging in style), good residuals. Enthusiasts rightly like them.
Stylish products, good marketing - marginally better engineered, not better at telling time than competition, look nice and decent residuals. AND expensive to maintain and you have to cope with snooty dealers.

Flying machine

1,132 posts

177 months

Wednesday 12th June 2013
quotequote all
jonby said:
yeti said:
AstonZagato said:
I have always regarded Rolex as being the Porsche 911 of watches. They are fabulous things, well engineered, great at what they do, lovely to look at (and unchanging in style), good residuals. Enthusiasts rightly like them.

However, they also happen to be the default choice for know-nothing cocks trying to impress and demonstrate that they are "considerably richer than yowww".
+1; dead on
that's three of us in agreement then

Is it a co-incidence that we are also all Aston owners I wonder
So how do you tell the difference? Does the Aston signify the former or the latter? tongue out

whoami

13,151 posts

241 months

Wednesday 12th June 2013
quotequote all
Mermaid said:
Stylish products, good marketing - marginally better engineered, not better at telling time than competition, look nice and decent residuals. AND expensive to maintain and you have to cope with snooty dealers.
Rolex dealers are snooty??

Riff Raff

5,138 posts

196 months

Wednesday 12th June 2013
quotequote all
Mermaid said:
AstonZagato said:
I have always regarded Rolex as being the Porsche 911 of watches. They are fabulous things, well engineered, great at what they do, lovely to look at (and unchanging in style), good residuals. Enthusiasts rightly like them.
Stylish products, good marketing - marginally better engineered, not better at telling time than competition, look nice and decent residuals. AND expensive to maintain and you have to cope with snooty dealers.
You want expensive to maintain? Try AP, or JLC. And I'm sure Patek and Vacheron will be up there too.

All things considered, Rolex aren't too bad pricewise, in my direct experience. And my local AD is a delight to deal with, no snootiness at all.

Perec

26,440 posts

223 months

Wednesday 12th June 2013
quotequote all
Riff Raff said:
Mermaid said:
AstonZagato said:
I have always regarded Rolex as being the Porsche 911 of watches. They are fabulous things, well engineered, great at what they do, lovely to look at (and unchanging in style), good residuals. Enthusiasts rightly like them.
Stylish products, good marketing - marginally better engineered, not better at telling time than competition, look nice and decent residuals. AND expensive to maintain and you have to cope with snooty dealers.
You want expensive to maintain? Try AP, or JLC. And I'm sure Patek and Vacheron will be up there too.

All things considered, Rolex aren't too bad pricewise, in my direct experience. And my local AD is a delight to deal with, no snootiness at all.
How much does a modern Rolex cost to service on average?

BryanUsrey

224 posts

161 months

Wednesday 12th June 2013
quotequote all
whoami said:
Rolex dealers are snooty??
I've been dealers that sell Tag Heuer be snooty, and some that sell Patek and A. Lange Sohne be very kind. All depends on the dealer I think.