Wrist Check 2015

[CardShark]

I got myself a new pair last week

[gregd]

Mr_C said:

DMJ73 said:

Picked this up earlier

i got to handle one of these the other day, I must say they're really rather nice.

I tried one on at Heathrow recently too.. Very tempted.. I hear 007 may be wearing this model in the new Bond film too.

[antspants]

[PJ S]

Ooh, spot the other Perrelet owner on here.....

[Uncle John]

Picked this up today!

Had my eye on it for a while.

Very happy with it!!

[RichTT]

My new (and only) discreet dress watch. I believe it's hand wound 1970's jumbo Zenith (37mm) Stainless Steel case, gilt hands + dial markers, blue dial with gold flecks through it that just sparkle in the sun. Wearing it on a vintage one piece perlon strap. I've not had the back off yet to check the movement.

[16plates]

Ocean one on the ocean.

[Craikeybaby]

RichTT said:

My new (and only) discreet dress watch. I believe it's hand wound 1970's jumbo Zenith (37mm) Stainless Steel case, gilt hands + dial markers, blue dial with gold flecks through it that just sparkle in the sun. Wearing it on a vintage one piece perlon strap. I've not had the back off yet to check the movement.

I like that a lot, it is quite similar in style to my Nomos Orion.

[chungasarnies]

Got this today to use as a daily wearer, MIJ model. Thought about a 007 but I really prefer the looks of this and I couldn't be happier with it, wears very neatly even on someone with tiny wrists like me!

[Blown2CV]

chungasarnies said:

Got this today to use as a daily wearer, MIJ model. Thought about a 007 but I really prefer the looks of this and I couldn't be happier with it, wears very neatly even on someone with tiny wrists like me!

you've drawn that!!

[Racea]

3rd Rolex and my favourite

[Racea]

Sorry for the side on picture !

[warren182]

[Matt80M]

Glowing Breitling

Edited by Matt80M on Friday 24th April 13:32

[PJ S]

It's nothing to do with Thumsnap, your computer is rotating the images, but the metadata hasn't been changed – you need to save the image to reflect the correct orientation to display.

[RobinBanks]

PJ S said:

It's nothing to do with Thumsnap, your computer is rotating the images, but the metadata hasn't been changed – you need to save the image to reflect the correct orientation to display.

So why do the photos always look normal on the computer viewed from the hard disk and then 90 degrees rotated on here?

[RobinBanks]

PJ S said:

It's nothing to do with Thumsnap, your computer is rotating the images, but the metadata hasn't been changed – you need to save the image to reflect the correct orientation to display.

So why do the photos always look normal on the computer viewed from the hard disk and then 90 degrees rotated on here?

Edited by RobinBanks on Wednesday 22 April 19:54

[Matt80M]

PJ S said:

It's nothing to do with Thumsnap, your computer is rotating the images, but the metadata hasn't been changed – you need to save the image to reflect the correct orientation to display.

Well, the little thumbnail which shows when you have successfully uploaded was the right way up so I'm totally confused now.

[anonymous-user]

On another thread it was said that it is to do with the way Apple handles the data.

I am not on an Apple device so can't check, but effectively it could look correct when saved but have the wrong orientation when uploaded here.

[RobinBanks]

desolate said:

On another thread it was said that it is to do with the way Apple handles the data.

I am not on an Apple device so can't check, but effectively it could look correct when saved but have the wrong orientation when uploaded here.

I'm a Windows user and it flips when I upload. And most of my photos are taken on an Android phone (none on an iPhone).