Apple watch

Author
Discussion

adamfawsitt

Original Poster:

523 posts

213 months

Saturday 24th January 2015
quotequote all
I have a YG Daytona as my daily driver and a Hublot and AP Royal Oak Offshore for other occasions. I am quite a gadget fiend and have, having reviewed the Apple website, decided to go with an Apple watch for occasions when my other watches don't suit an occasion or activity.

Is anyone else going to buy one and if so why?

DH01

820 posts

168 months

Saturday 24th January 2015
quotequote all
PP next, then toy watches .

brickwall

5,237 posts

210 months

Tuesday 10th March 2015
quotequote all
Well, now prices have been announced, anyone in?

The pricing on the 'Edition' (Gold) versions seems utterly mental. £13,500 for a gold-plated version of a £400 watch? Even as a fully signed-up Apple Fanboy, they can fk right off.

adamfawsitt

Original Poster:

523 posts

213 months

Tuesday 10th March 2015
quotequote all
I am definitely in - Black Aluminium Sport with Black Strap. Closest match to my iPhone and a bargain!

Blaster72

10,818 posts

197 months

Tuesday 10th March 2015
quotequote all
I like the concept but not the execution - even the bling versions are pretty ugly.

Better to hold fire and wait for the 2nd or 3rd version which will inevitably be much, much better.

Craikeybaby

10,401 posts

225 months

Tuesday 10th March 2015
quotequote all
I like the look of the black stainless steel one with bracelet, but I won't be buying one.

I though one of my mates would be getting one, he's a big Apple fan & buys most of their gadgets, but he seemed pretty shocked by the prices, which I thought seemed pretty reasonable compared to normal watches.

Asterix

24,438 posts

228 months

Tuesday 10th March 2015
quotequote all
Blaster72 said:
I like the concept but not the execution - even the bling versions are pretty ugly.

Better to hold fire and wait for the 2nd or 3rd version which will inevitably be much, much better.
...and the 4th & 5th iterations will be even better, new tech, etc...

It's a tough one to drop that amount of cash on something that will no doubt have a very limited tech life, but as you say, the idea is fantastic and it will be brilliant to see how it evolves along with other 'smartwear'.

Emonda03

740 posts

200 months

Tuesday 10th March 2015
quotequote all
Yep I will have the sports version ...currently wear a basis peak, as like to see my activity etc and resting heat rate..expecting the apple watch to be a big step forward from the basis.Very interesting gadget to play with hopefully. Bit worried it might make my watch collection redundant though!!

Craikeybaby

10,401 posts

225 months

Tuesday 10th March 2015
quotequote all
I wonder if the attitude is different in the computers & technology forum to here.

clonmult

10,529 posts

209 months

Tuesday 10th March 2015
quotequote all
Emonda03 said:
Yep I will have the sports version ...currently wear a basis peak, as like to see my activity etc and resting heat rate..expecting the apple watch to be a big step forward from the basis.Very interesting gadget to play with hopefully. Bit worried it might make my watch collection redundant though!!
Battery life on the Apple Watch kinda precludes it from giving you a proper resting heart rate reading. It won't be any more accurate than the basis (or other similar optical HRMs), so will be pretty useless for a lot of gym work (although they're surprisingly accurate on running, useless on weight training).

Sure, its an interesting gadget, but it really is very much a v1 device. They'll get it right (or less wrong?) next year.

clonmult

10,529 posts

209 months

Tuesday 10th March 2015
quotequote all
Craikeybaby said:
I wonder if the attitude is different in the computers & technology forum to here.
Overall attitude seems to be "meh", mixed with "damn its ugly" and "how farking much??".

PJ S

10,842 posts

227 months

Tuesday 10th March 2015
quotequote all
brickwall said:
Well, now prices have been announced, anyone in?

The pricing on the 'Edition' (Gold) versions seems utterly mental. £13,500 for a gold-plated version of a £400 watch? Even as a fully signed-up Apple Fanboy, they can fk right off.
Don't let facts ruin a good rant, but the Edition versions are machined from solid 18K yellow and rose gold blanks.

jshell

11,006 posts

205 months

Tuesday 10th March 2015
quotequote all
PJ S said:
brickwall said:
Well, now prices have been announced, anyone in?

The pricing on the 'Edition' (Gold) versions seems utterly mental. £13,500 for a gold-plated version of a £400 watch? Even as a fully signed-up Apple Fanboy, they can fk right off.
Don't let facts ruin a good rant, but the Edition versions are machined from solid 18K yellow and rose gold blanks.
How many ounces?

130R

6,810 posts

206 months

Tuesday 10th March 2015
quotequote all
jshell said:
How many ounces?
Because that is what it will be worth in 2 years

RacingBlue

1,394 posts

164 months

Tuesday 10th March 2015
quotequote all
A first gen Apple product, guaranteed to be obsolete within a year? No thanks.

Craikeybaby

10,401 posts

225 months

Tuesday 10th March 2015
quotequote all
It will be interesting to see if they stick to the annual release cycle that they use for consumer electronics devices.

jshell

11,006 posts

205 months

Tuesday 10th March 2015
quotequote all
130R said:
jshell said:
How many ounces?
Because that is what it will be worth in 2 years
yes

rich83

14,210 posts

138 months

Tuesday 10th March 2015
quotequote all
I just dont see why anyone who is a watch fan would want one of these things..... load of c*** IMO

Stu R

21,410 posts

215 months

Tuesday 10th March 2015
quotequote all
rich83 said:
I just dont see why anyone who is a watch fan would want one of these things..... load of c*** IMO
And yet, plenty of us do and think otherwise.