Wedding+bonus watch

[Blown2CV]

Fwiw, seadweller at bottom, deepsea at top.



Sigh. Sorry about rotation again.

[LaurasOtherHalf]

I still think the internal ring on the deep sea spoils an otherwise lovely watch, it just looks crap IMHO.

Strangely, as much as I dislike brietlings I do really like the ones in your OP.

A totally personal thing however for me, I just don't see a rolex sub as a watch for a wedding day. For me they're fantastic watches to be worn every day, but they are very much a sports watch, something that looks best when dressing down.

A datejust would just seem more fitting for the occasion though obviously you're not just buying the watch to wear for that one day!

[Blown2CV]

Take your point but if it's not dressy enough in the end I'll maybe just get something additional. Don't tell the Mrs, in advance! Also don't like datejusts.

[yeti]

LaurasOtherHalf said:

I still think the internal ring on the deep sea spoils an otherwise lovely watch, it just looks crap IMHO.

It's there for a reason though! That's the ringlock part of the case and what stops it collapsing at 3900m +25% pressure.

If it was plain, it would probably look worse.

[Blown2CV]

yeti said:

LaurasOtherHalf said:

I still think the internal ring on the deep sea spoils an otherwise lovely watch, it just looks crap IMHO.

It's there for a reason though! That's the ringlock part of the case and what stops it collapsing at 3900m +25% pressure.

If it was plain, it would probably look worse.

The ring isn't massively noticeable in the flesh, which is not what you'd expect. Only really noticeable side-by-side. The biggest difference is the size and weight, but weirdly it's not really apparent from the photo. It's just a little bigger in every dimension, mainly depth which you can't see. Might have a photo. I love the seadweller, but am starting to think if you're gonna be a bear, be a grizzly!!

[Blown2CV]

[RobinBanks]

The Sea-Dweller is just about my favourite watch at the moment, I think. So that's what I'd go for.