Is this Daytona real?

[GC8]

DH01 said:

ecain63 said:

Difficult to say but bezel does not appear to be crisp enough in detail, but that could be bad lighting or phone res.

Ask Dom H seems to be an appropriate response .

This surprised me at first, then I realised that he focussed on one particular detail immediately, then missed the bleeding obvious.

[MGZRod]

Was just after confirmation guys! Don't do rolex so was after some confirmation

[traffman]

Walk away!

[Haggleburyfinius]

The proportions are totally wrong too. Bezel/face.

[Hoofy]

Forget the tiny detail. It's the subdials that are the bits to check first. It's a watch for timing things so you'd expect not to see date-related markings!

[DH01]

Unless it's that elusive beast that many lust after,

The Perpetual Calendar GMT Daytona,

Could be ???

They must have forgotten to display this model at Basel.

Edited by DH01 on Saturday 25th April 18:02