Taking the plunge - First pricey watch?

Taking the plunge - First pricey watch?

Author
Discussion

SirSquidalot

Original Poster:

4,041 posts

165 months

Saturday 3rd October 2015
quotequote all
Hi all,

Been mulling over this for a while now, I'm a lover of watches and am thinking of buying my first high ticket watch. As abit of background the most I usually spend is around £100, I have about 15 in my collection at the minute split between Quartz and autos.

Recently I've had a pay rise and am living comfortably and have some saving stashed away. I've been looking to get a decent watch and the main 3 I've come to are:

Omega Moon Watch
Tudor Pelagos
Rolex Sea dweller 16600

I know all 3 are different and are all at different price ranges but I just don't know what to go for, the rolex stands out as a good buy that will most likely hold value and as a bonus a fair few are about from my birth year. I should add I'd rather buy used from a good dealer as it seems to be the best way.

Any advice for a newby?

Alex

PJ S

10,842 posts

227 months

Saturday 3rd October 2015
quotequote all
Your logic is sound, especially if you think there’ll be a time in the future when you might need to liquidate the watch.
Get in touch with dom h on here (Hackett watches) if you decide to opt for the 16600.

As for the Tudor, presumably you’re referring to the original with the ETA movement, rather than the new version with in-house and longer power reserve?
If so, then it’ll be relatively easy and cheap to service when needed, even though Tudor’s prices are less than Rolex’s, whilst still done by the same people at RSC.

SirSquidalot

Original Poster:

4,041 posts

165 months

Saturday 3rd October 2015
quotequote all
Correct it would be an original Pelagos. The new ones dial is not my cup of tea with the short story that's written on it!

freshkid

199 posts

192 months

Saturday 3rd October 2015
quotequote all
I would say get the Rolex because it's an icon. The moon watch is cool and everything but it's hand wind. Can you really be arsed with that? If you get the Pelagos you'll probably end up buying the Rolex in a year or so anyway so it's actually way more expensive in the long run.

SirSquidalot

Original Poster:

4,041 posts

165 months

Saturday 3rd October 2015
quotequote all
Rolex being the clear winner then, what's the view on box and papers. Having both is the best way to ensure the value will be held? Without both would seem abit dodgy to me.

Importr

111 posts

194 months

Sunday 4th October 2015
quotequote all
Yep, I too would agree on the SD. Given the choices there. The Speedy isn't that versatile due to the hesalite crystal marking easily (presuming that you're looking at the hand wind version) and the Pelagos... well, I personally don't think its as nice as a modern Black Bay but that's just my opinion.

Hoofy

76,352 posts

282 months

Sunday 4th October 2015
quotequote all
I wouldn't buy a watch just because it's a good investment. I'd want something that makes me think "Wow!" whenever I wear it. I find the design of the Rolex divers a bit awkward. Triangles, circles, bars, squares, skinny hands, a Mercedes logo. It's a bit 13 year old schoolboy project.

The original Air-King OTOH...

Variomatic

2,392 posts

161 months

Sunday 4th October 2015
quotequote all
Hoofy said:
The original Air-King OTOH...
What? A Rolex that doesn't feel the need to shout "look at me!!!!"? Where's the point in that? biggrin

Hoofy

76,352 posts

282 months

Sunday 4th October 2015
quotequote all
Variomatic said:
Hoofy said:
The original Air-King OTOH...
What? A Rolex that doesn't feel the need to shout "look at me!!!!"? Where's the point in that? biggrin
Ugh. You're right.

OPer, do not settle for anything less. http://i.ebayimg.com/00/s/OTYwWDEyODA=/z/5VsAAMXQM...

Variomatic

2,392 posts

161 months

Sunday 4th October 2015
quotequote all
I'm now a little worried that you even knew where to look for an image of that monstrosity!

Hoofy

76,352 posts

282 months

Sunday 4th October 2015
quotequote all
Variomatic said:
I'm now a little worried that you even knew where to look for an image of that monstrosity!
Liar. You own that one.

Variomatic

2,392 posts

161 months

Sunday 4th October 2015
quotequote all
At least yeti will be pleased that it's not a copy biggrin

Hoofy

76,352 posts

282 months

Sunday 4th October 2015
quotequote all
Variomatic said:
At least yeti will be pleased that it's not a copy biggrin
Sure it's not a quartz?

Variomatic

2,392 posts

161 months

Sunday 4th October 2015
quotequote all
Who cares when it's stuffed in the back of a drawer because you're too ashamed to show it in public?

SirSquidalot

Original Poster:

4,041 posts

165 months

Sunday 4th October 2015
quotequote all
Found a few potential 16600 Sea Dwellers. Looking to be around the £4-4.5k mark, ideally wanting box and papers for peace of mind.

Hoofy

76,352 posts

282 months

Sunday 4th October 2015
quotequote all
Variomatic said:
Who cares when it's stuffed in the back of a drawer because you're too ashamed to show it in public?
biggrin

Hoofy

76,352 posts

282 months

Sunday 4th October 2015
quotequote all
SirSquidalot said:
Found a few potential 16600 Sea Dwellers. Looking to be around the £4-4.5k mark, ideally wanting box and papers for peace of mind.
If just for peace of mind, buy from a reliable source and you'll be fine. smile

SirSquidalot

Original Poster:

4,041 posts

165 months

Monday 5th October 2015
quotequote all
Good news! Have found a very nice 2003 model, admittedly not a birth year laugh But it is in fantastic condition and has all boxes and documentation. Enquired through Chrono24 and am speaking with the dealer currently.

Hard-Drive

4,079 posts

229 months

Monday 5th October 2015
quotequote all
Consider second hand. Buy wise and you can end up with the watch of your dreams without the frightening price and the absolute heartbreak of a minor scratch on the clasp.

Also, do try a Pelagos on first. I really lusted after one, and it looked gorgeous on the net and in the window, however it looked totally unremarkable on the wrist. I think a few people on here have had the same thought...

Nigel_O

2,889 posts

219 months

Tuesday 6th October 2015
quotequote all
Late last year, when I found myself in a similar position to the OP, I also posted on this forum for some advice.

Budget creep had already seen me abandon the idea of a Steinhart in favour of a genuine high-end watch. I professed to rather liking (but not quite having the funds for) the no-date Submariner, and there were many valid suggestions for less-expensive alternatives.

However, the general consensus was that whatever I bought, it wouldn't be a Submariner, so I was sagely advised to wait, pull together some more cash and go for what I really wanted.

The clincher for me was a superb offer on a new Sub from Dom Hackett - it has been on my wrist almost constantly since I took delivery on 14th Jan this year. Only a couple of people know about it (even Wifey hasn't noticed yet...) but I don't care - I know its there and it makes me feel good every time I look at it.

So, to answer the OP - have a much closer look at all three - try them on, see what they look like on your wrist, and buy the watch that you WANT, rather than the one that will depreciate the least or the one that you think other people will notice.