Bi metal watches.

Author
Discussion

Boxbrownie

172 posts

116 months

Monday 6th June 2016
quotequote all
leginigel said:
Snap...one of my vintage versions, a nice pie pan face, now given to my Son for his wedding

Boxbrownie

172 posts

116 months

Monday 6th June 2016
quotequote all
13m said:
I haven't thought they look good since about 1988.

However, in the last couple of days I have seen two examples that have turned my head. One was a Rolex GMT II, the other a Datejust with white dial.


Thoughts?
Actually a 1977 (wedding year) version I think still looks good, classic and with a white dial slightly different from the miriad of dodgy sunburst faced chinese versions LOL.

13m

Original Poster:

26,321 posts

223 months

Monday 6th June 2016
quotequote all
Boxbrownie said:
Actually a 1977 (wedding year) version I think still looks good, classic and with a white dial slightly different from the miriad of dodgy sunburst faced chinese versions LOL.
Nice. I like the white dial.

13m

Original Poster:

26,321 posts

223 months

Monday 6th June 2016
quotequote all

I was in a restaurant earlier today adjacent to three black fellas who were, apparently, used car dealers. By strange coincidence they not only shared a profession but a name - Bruv. And they referred to each other by name continuously and loudly.

Anyway, at least two of them were wearing bi-metal Rolex Daytonas which looked OK if a little clichéd given their line of work. One of them was wearing a full yellow gold model though, which looked better against black skin to be honest.

13m

Original Poster:

26,321 posts

223 months

Thursday 2nd February 2017
quotequote all

I'm still suffering with this odd obsession. I can see me buying a bi-metal Datejust before long. The only problem being, I had it in mind that bi-metal Rolexes fell off a cliff price-wise second hand. Seems I was wrong though - they are quiet expensive.



HarrySmash

459 posts

140 months

Thursday 2nd February 2017
quotequote all
I'd forgotten about this thread.
My new Daytona purchase back in August worked out all well in the end - still need to take/ post a picture though.
At the time buying new with a discount wasn't a great deal more than buying pre-owned.

DJMC

3,438 posts

104 months

Thursday 2nd February 2017
quotequote all
13m said:
I'm still suffering with this odd obsession. I can see me buying a bi-metal Datejust before long. The only problem being, I had it in mind that bi-metal Rolexes fell off a cliff price-wise second hand. Seems I was wrong though - they are quiet expensive.
Could it be because the gold coloured metal is... gold? And gold is more expensive than stainless steel?

Still loving mine, but then I AM an old man!




Edited by DJMC on Thursday 2nd February 22:13

Zingari

904 posts

174 months

Thursday 2nd February 2017
quotequote all
Not for me. I had a bi metal blue Submariner around 2001. I then saw a chap around the corner had one and he'd 'dress his up' with bright nylon singlet, shorts and gold ID bracelet and heavy neck chain whilst flashing it about. I lasted about 6 months before mine had to go. He then 'progressed' to a steel Daytona which is one of the reasons I'm against buying one.

Now my chum has the current Platinum Daytona and that's a whole different ball game. That is a nice watch.

13m

Original Poster:

26,321 posts

223 months

Friday 3rd February 2017
quotequote all
DJMC said:
13m said:
I'm still suffering with this odd obsession. I can see me buying a bi-metal Datejust before long. The only problem being, I had it in mind that bi-metal Rolexes fell off a cliff price-wise second hand. Seems I was wrong though - they are quiet expensive.
Could it be because the gold coloured metal is... gold? And gold is more expensive than stainless steel?
Not really. Bi-metal watches were fetching less money secondhand than steel. I think that applied to Rolex, I am not sure, but it certainly did with other brands.

Johnniem

2,674 posts

224 months

Friday 3rd February 2017
quotequote all
bayleaf said:
DH01 said:



Not to everyone's taste. Certainly not for those that appreciate retained value over craftsmanship .

Tahitian Black Mother of Pearl, stunning.
I don't think stunning is the word. Horrific possibly!
It really is isn't it!! Aaaarrgh, my eyes!!!!!!

All in my opinion of course...

Mr Roper

13,013 posts

195 months

Friday 3rd February 2017
quotequote all
coldsnap said:
I've been looking at the older 2 tone rose gold DJs lately, I'm really not sure how this has happened smile

The new DJ41 is very nice:

Very nice

coldsnap

867 posts

160 months

Friday 3rd February 2017
quotequote all
Mr Roper said:
coldsnap said:
I've been looking at the older 2 tone rose gold DJs lately, I'm really not sure how this has happened smile

The new DJ41 is very nice:

Very nice
As this was an old thread, as an update I did end up buying one last year, love it:




Edited by coldsnap on Friday 3rd February 13:09