Are Pateks worth the money?

Are Pateks worth the money?

Author
Discussion

thebraketester

14,232 posts

138 months

Monday 20th June 2016
quotequote all
No doubt they make some beautiful watches.... they also make some horrors. The Nautilus being one of them.

13m

Original Poster:

26,287 posts

222 months

Monday 20th June 2016
quotequote all
Saw a chap wearing a Gondolo today. It didn't look that special - a bit too big probably.

InductionRoar

2,014 posts

132 months

Monday 20th June 2016
quotequote all
13m said:
Saw a chap wearing a Gondolo today. It didn't look that special - a bit too big probably.
There aren't too many watches I would place higher on my want list than a 5098P. smokin

13m

Original Poster:

26,287 posts

222 months

Tuesday 21st June 2016
quotequote all
InductionRoar said:
13m said:
Saw a chap wearing a Gondolo today. It didn't look that special - a bit too big probably.
There aren't too many watches I would place higher on my want list than a 5098P. smokin
Again too big to my eye.


Bobajobbob

1,440 posts

96 months

Tuesday 21st June 2016
quotequote all


This is absolutely beautiful but out of my league thus my comment above. I love the high end watches but in the sub 50k range there aren't so many designs I like. I prefer the design of a submariner or a Daytona or a modern Royal Oak in most cases.

thebraketester

14,232 posts

138 months

Tuesday 21st June 2016
quotequote all
Thats a beautiful watch.

El Guapo

2,787 posts

190 months

Wednesday 22nd June 2016
quotequote all
If I were in the market for a Patek I would choose this

marcosgt

11,021 posts

176 months

Wednesday 22nd June 2016
quotequote all
GC8 said:
A Sicura, really. Ask Willy Breitling.
Be a bit hard, he died in 1978...

No new watch over £100 is worth the money you pay for it in any absolute terms, it's just down to whether you perceive the value in it.

If you like Patek Philippes and have the funds, it might be worth it to you. No-one here can make that judgement for anyone else.

M

Edited by marcosgt on Wednesday 22 June 16:37

ukshooter

501 posts

212 months

Wednesday 22nd June 2016
quotequote all
The earlier comment about Patek's going up and only making money if bought second hand is not true.

My most expensive Patek is the 5130R (rose gold World Time) which I believe has just recently stopped being made. I bought it new in 2007 when the UK list price was around £17,000 (I got it for £15,000 from Europe due to pure good luck on exchange rates). The last retail price for it in 2016 was £33,400 or thereabouts.

I sold my Officers model 5022 2 years ago to a trader who offered me £20,000 for the World Time so had I wanted to sell I would have made a profit on what was a 7 year old watch I brought new. As for the Officers model, I made circa 55% profit on what I paid new for it back in 2000.

The 5130R appears on the web used from time to time circa £25k. It took me a while to get used to it but it is a lovely everyday watch. As for value, I use a Citizen ltd edition world time which was about £600 on my motorbike adventures :-) Radio controlled for accuracy.

As for are Patek's worth the money? It's all subjective. Are DB5's worth half a million? They don't drive that well but there is something about them.




Blown2CV

28,816 posts

203 months

Wednesday 22nd June 2016
quotequote all
i think that, ultimately, many people when they can't afford something assume that it isn't worth the money. I guess it helps them deal with the fact that other people have more money than them.

13m

Original Poster:

26,287 posts

222 months

Wednesday 22nd June 2016
quotequote all
Blown2CV said:
i think that, ultimately, many people when they can't afford something assume that it isn't worth the money. I guess it helps them deal with the fact that other people have more money than them.
Or maybe some people who could afford one really struggle to understand why they would want to.

RichB

51,573 posts

284 months

Wednesday 22nd June 2016
quotequote all
13m said:
Bobajobbob said:
My only problem with Pateks is that apart from the super exclusive and super expensive low volume models that are in the £100,000k+ range I have never found one I like the look of. The calatrava dress watches are ok I guess but are for occasional wear. I want to like the Nautilus range but find them ugly. In short I'd like a Patek but I don't like them ?? .
Agreed. I haven't bought one less because of the price, more because I'd struggle to buy anything I don't like the look of. I asked the question originally because I'd just been looking in a Patek dealer's window and found myself wondering how anyone would want to pay the asking price of some of them when the best of them are pedestrian and the worst bloody ugly.
Odd because there are several I like the look of, not that I would buy a collection but have no trouble selecting one of the range. I particularly like this.


13m

Original Poster:

26,287 posts

222 months

Wednesday 22nd June 2016
quotequote all
RichB said:
Odd because there are several I like the look of, not that I would buy a collection but have no trouble selecting one of the range. I particularly like this.

Nope, leaves me cold. I can see the point of this:

But I could just as easily be swayed by a similar looking JLC.



RichB

51,573 posts

284 months

Wednesday 22nd June 2016
quotequote all
Agree, it's an academic debate but simply shows that when someone emphatically says they're all fugly that it's not the case to many people.

PJ S

10,842 posts

227 months

Wednesday 22nd June 2016
quotequote all
13m said:
Nope, leaves me cold. I can see the point of this:
But I could just as easily be swayed by a similar looking JLC.
Or an H Moser & Cie, or Girard Perregaux 1966

ReaperCushions

6,018 posts

184 months

Wednesday 22nd June 2016
quotequote all
El Guapo said:
If I were in the market for a Patek I would choose this
Genuine question here... removing any emotional reasons for buying a watch...

What are you actually paying for with this watch over say a Seiko that looks identical?




InductionRoar

2,014 posts

132 months

Wednesday 22nd June 2016
quotequote all
ReaperCushions said:
El Guapo said:
If I were in the market for a Patek I would choose this
Genuine question here... removing any emotional reasons for buying a watch...

What are you actually paying for with this watch over say a Seiko that looks identical?

thebraketester

14,232 posts

138 months

Wednesday 22nd June 2016
quotequote all
ReaperCushions said:
El Guapo said:
If I were in the market for a Patek I would choose this
Genuine question here... removing any emotional reasons for buying a watch...

What are you actually paying for with this watch over say a Seiko that looks identical?
The seiko will be more accurate probably. lol

Im guessing the pateks are all handmade movements?

PJ S

10,842 posts

227 months

Thursday 23rd June 2016
quotequote all
thebraketester said:
The seiko will be more accurate probably. lol

Im guessing the pateks are all handmade movements?
Assuming the member meant Grand Seiko, then possibly, even though the regulation for the regular and hi-beat autos is -3/+5, since they often outperform their stated specs.
As for all Pateks using handmade movements – not a chance. Mechanised parts production with limited hand finishing on the “entry level” models.
What’s being paid for is the brand’s cachet, it’s historical achievements, retailer’s very healthy margin.
You do also get a nice looking movement, sometimes one of the thinest with the complications fitted – but according to Philippe DuFour, AL&S, Chopard LUC, AP, and Credor (Seiko), are all considered to be ahead of Patek in finishing terms.

http://www.veryimportantwatches.com/files/pdf/CREA...
http://www.veryimportantwatches.com/files/pdf/CREA...

thebraketester

14,232 posts

138 months

Thursday 23rd June 2016
quotequote all
For 50k+ I would want a hand made movement, lubricated with swans tears!