The dream watch purchase: up to £50,000 to spend.

The dream watch purchase: up to £50,000 to spend.

Author
Discussion

Tuvra

7,921 posts

225 months

Monday 24th October 2016
quotequote all
Porsche911R said:
A bit like cars I would take 2 at £10k and one at £30k , over one at £50k
I'd struggle to get anywhere near the £50k budget, I would probably be much happier with x4 £10k watches, a couple of G-Shocks and a load of custom straps/clasps etc.

Line up would probably look something like this:-






Ffffaster

241 posts

160 months

Monday 24th October 2016
quotequote all
Monty Python said:
As long as it gives me the time with reasonable accuracy I don't really care. I've never seen the point of spending thousands on a watch that (a) hardly anybody else will see and (b) makes you look like a complete ____ when you have to explain to someone why your watch cost more than a decent car.
Never fails does it.

Someone puts up an interesting thread and then someone who clearly doesn't have any understanding of the topic or the context makes a bitter little comment. Zero positive contribution but types away anyway. Well done to everyone else for ignoring the troll and enjoying the thought process, wish I could, but will going forward!

The A. Lange & Söhne Richard Lange 'Pour le Mérite' is gorgeous: https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/a-lange-sohne-ri...


Adam B

27,244 posts

254 months

Monday 24th October 2016
quotequote all
foreright said:
T6 vanman said:
Hah, is it wrong that I actually quite like that? getmecoat
Not if you are Idi Amin or Muammar Gaddafi I suppose

Prohibiting

1,740 posts

118 months

Monday 24th October 2016
quotequote all
Something with a tourbillion movement. Although looking at that Ressense Type 3..... smile

sealtt

3,091 posts

158 months

Monday 24th October 2016
quotequote all
£61k brand new list, but grey market would probably be on budget-ish.




Tried it on this weekend, love it! Thinking about it wink

howardhughes

1,006 posts

204 months

Monday 24th October 2016
quotequote all
sealtt said:
£61k brand new list, but grey market would probably be on budget-ish.




Tried it on this weekend, love it! Thinking about it wink
Very nice indeed sir.

r11co

6,244 posts

230 months

Monday 24th October 2016
quotequote all
T6 vanman said:
auction said:
NEVER WORN
No fking wonder.

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 24th October 2016
quotequote all
If ever a thread screamed that money cannot buy taste, this is it.

Vee12V

1,332 posts

160 months

Monday 24th October 2016
quotequote all
I'd probably spend it on multiple watches, but given it could only be one I'd say a Laurent Ferrier Galet micro rotor or Galet square.


And172940

263 posts

148 months

Monday 24th October 2016
quotequote all


Am I allowed to blow the budget apart?

I'd love one of these, hand delivered by the man himself included in the price!

Adam B

27,244 posts

254 months

Monday 24th October 2016
quotequote all
Vee12V said:
I'd probably spend it on multiple watches, but given it could only be one I'd say a Laurent Ferrier Galet micro rotor or Galet square.

that is very tasteful, especially as you've blown £50k on a watch that looks like it cost £100

(no doubt the interior complications are made from royal blood, unicorn horn and Kim Kardashian's hymen)

sealtt

3,091 posts

158 months

Monday 24th October 2016
quotequote all
hashluck said:
Laurent Ferrier Galet Traveller Globe - easiest to use Travel Time watch I have seen, superlative micro-rotor movement, finished off with a cloissone enamel dial easily a rival to the Patek 5131

Or a Lanhe and Sohne Richard Lange Pour le Merite - a time only watch with a fusee chain movement and three-piece enamel dial (this is out of budget but they have just released a black dial version (NOT enamel) which is but I think the enamel dial does make the piece).





Edited by hashluck on Monday 24th October 17:20
I love the traveller, have wanted one for a long time.

Adam B

27,244 posts

254 months

Monday 24th October 2016
quotequote all
I stand corrected, although no wiser as to why that cost £50k. Not knocking your choice by the way V12Vee, someone here actually likes that leopard print Rolex laugh



GALET MICRO-ROTOR

Representing a subtle blend of traditions and contemporary techniques, the Galet Micro-Rotor features an understated dial concealing a concentrated blend of horological innovations.
Its calibre that is automatically wound by means of an off-centred micro-rotor, stems from an exclusive development inspired by the “natural” escapement invented by Abraham-Louis Breguet. This new double direct-impulse escapement fitted directly on the balance is equipped with a silicon lever. This modern construction, combined with the use of cutting-edge materials, maximises energy efficiency, which in turn ensures high amplitude for the balance and reduces the mechanical force required to wind the mainspring.
The harmonious construction and the technical performances of the Galet Micro-Rotor are part of a global approach envisaged for each of the movement parts, aimed at optimising energy management – the ultimate goal being to improve user friendliness by more efficient automatic winding of the movement.

macky17

2,212 posts

189 months

Monday 24th October 2016
quotequote all
Ffffaster said:
Monty Python said:
As long as it gives me the time with reasonable accuracy I don't really care. I've never seen the point of spending thousands on a watch that (a) hardly anybody else will see and (b) makes you look like a complete ____ when you have to explain to someone why your watch cost more than a decent car.
Never fails does it.

Someone puts up an interesting thread and then someone who clearly doesn't have any understanding of the topic or the context makes a bitter little comment. Zero positive contribution but types away anyway. Well done to everyone else for ignoring the troll and enjoying the thought process, wish I could, but will going forward!

The A. Lange & Söhne Richard Lange 'Pour le Mérite' is gorgeous: https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/a-lange-sohne-ri...

I agree the 'makes you look like...' element of the post was unnecessary but I totally empathise with the first half: will someone explain the expensive watch thing to me? I imagine I feel about watches the way my family feel about my car obsession: confused. Is it the look of them? The precision mechanics? I just don't get it. I'd have to be a multimillionaire to spend more than a few hundred on one there are so many things I'd rather blow cash on.

r11co

6,244 posts

230 months

Monday 24th October 2016
quotequote all
Adam B said:
that is very tasteful, especially as you've blown £50k on a watch that looks like it cost £100

(no doubt the interior complications are made from royal blood, unicorn horn and Kim Kardashian's hymen)
...and is a derivative of a derivative. I'm seeing Panerai Radiomir with poncey lugs

peter450

1,650 posts

233 months

Monday 24th October 2016
quotequote all
macky17 said:
Ffffaster said:
Monty Python said:
As long as it gives me the time with reasonable accuracy I don't really care. I've never seen the point of spending thousands on a watch that (a) hardly anybody else will see and (b) makes you look like a complete ____ when you have to explain to someone why your watch cost more than a decent car.
Never fails does it.

Someone puts up an interesting thread and then someone who clearly doesn't have any understanding of the topic or the context makes a bitter little comment. Zero positive contribution but types away anyway. Well done to everyone else for ignoring the troll and enjoying the thought process, wish I could, but will going forward!

The A. Lange & Söhne Richard Lange 'Pour le Mérite' is gorgeous: https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/a-lange-sohne-ri...

I agree the 'makes you look like...' element of the post was unnecessary but I totally empathise with the first half: will someone explain the expensive watch thing to me? I imagine I feel about watches the way my family feel about my car obsession: confused. Is it the look of them? The precision mechanics? I just don't get it. I'd have to be a multimillionaire to spend more than a few hundred on one there are so many things I'd rather blow cash on.
Your not alone, I can see the difference between a car that costs 15k 45k and 135k pretty easily. A 1k watch or a 30k one would be lost on me, same with gemstones diamonds etc a fake would sucker me right in.

I guess different people appreciate different things

I think I'd find it hard to justify spending a lot of cash on anything that I did not see a difference in value in, but then if I was really into watches I might have a different viewpoint as I'd see the difference in value

r11co

6,244 posts

230 months

Monday 24th October 2016
quotequote all
peter450 said:
I think I'd find it hard to justify spending a lot of cash on anything that I did not see a difference in value in, but then if I was really into watches I might have a different viewpoint as I'd see the difference in value
I'm a watch person, but I very much believe that high-end watches are like high-end hi-fi. The law of diminishing returns very much applies and the point comes where the engineering does not improve, just the cost of the materials used goes up.

jr6yam

1,303 posts

183 months

Monday 24th October 2016
quotequote all
I don't care if it's frivolous overpriced nonsense (not the point of this thread anyway)
If I had £50K to 'waste' on a watch, it would be this

An 1815 Chronograph, just beautiful
I like the double split too, but it's a bit pricey; and looks huge on my puny wrist

hashluck

1,612 posts

275 months

Monday 24th October 2016
quotequote all
sealtt said:
I love the traveller, have wanted one for a long time.
It is a great watch. I was lucky enough to visit the Laurent Ferrier atelier last year and meet the man himself (as you probably know he spent many years at Patek, which is about 200m from his workshop, and raced at Le Mans coming in third, so he is all good with me smile

AlexC1981

4,923 posts

217 months

Monday 24th October 2016
quotequote all
macky17 said:
I agree the 'makes you look like...' element of the post was unnecessary but I totally empathise with the first half: will someone explain the expensive watch thing to me? I imagine I feel about watches the way my family feel about my car obsession: confused. Is it the look of them? The precision mechanics? I just don't get it. I'd have to be a multimillionaire to spend more than a few hundred on one there are so many things I'd rather blow cash on.
Don't even try to understand smile

Why does someone spend £5000 for their family to spend two weeks getting burnt on a lilo? Pointless!

Why do some people have a wall full of diecast model cars, collected over the years and must have cost them hundreds if not a thousand, only to make the room look like a child's bedroom? Nincompoops!

Why were some people paying hundreds of pounds for new £5 notes with an "AA" in the serial number? Madness! Even crazier than stamp collectors.

Why did I spend a few thousand on a 35 year old car, just to use on summer weekends when it's not raining? What sort of twerp throws his hard earned around like that!

Why go to a Michelin starred restaurant when you can get 80% of the flavour at 10% of the cost from a chain restaurant? Don't get me started on the cost of the wine/whisky/vodka when Tesco's own brand would do.

Why buy that expensive vintage cabinet or oil painting when you can get something from Ikea? Who are you trying to impress?

I could go on!