Why do Rolex types go ga-ga for red text?

Why do Rolex types go ga-ga for red text?

Author
Discussion

immigrant

Original Poster:

397 posts

195 months

Wednesday 28th December 2016
quotequote all
I get that they're vintage models but it seems odd to me.

Is it because nothing else changed in decades, and therefore the minutiae count as special?


dimots

3,083 posts

90 months

Wednesday 28th December 2016
quotequote all
Do you really need to ask? If you're a collector of anything it's the rarities that eventually come to define your search.

Yex 450

4,583 posts

220 months

Thursday 29th December 2016
quotequote all
dimots said:
Do you really need to ask? If you're a collector of anything it's the rarities that eventually come to define your search.
This is exactly right for Rolex watches with red text, particularly double lines of red text smile

Having said that...................single lines of black text on a white background are even more rare and priced accordingly hehe

traffman

2,263 posts

209 months

Thursday 29th December 2016
quotequote all
I believe the red text Subs were just a wee bit higher in price than your standard Sub. Now though they are worth far far more.

Along with the Paul Newman Dayona's , Milsubs , Comex and so on.

bazza.

698 posts

92 months

Friday 30th December 2016
quotequote all
You mean like this smile
The Red Text makes it worth 3x the price of the non red model its mad but true
Think of it like VW bug with a split screen vs a standard model ££££££

At the min Blowers has one with Box and papers for £21k without around £15k non-red 5/6k ish


Blown2CV

28,811 posts

203 months

Friday 30th December 2016
quotequote all
another of these fking threads.

hosedoctor

664 posts

217 months

Friday 30th December 2016
quotequote all
Blown2CV said:
another of these fking threads.
It's a watch forum what do you expect you retard! LOL

Blown2CV

28,811 posts

203 months

Friday 30th December 2016
quotequote all
hosedoctor said:
Blown2CV said:
another of these fking threads.
It's a watch forum what do you expect you retard! LOL
offensive word really isn't it, not on at all. Also I think you've got the wrong end of the stick, so careful what mud you throw around.

What I meant is another fking thread where someone asks the fundamentally stupid question of "how can item X possibly be worth value Y??? It cannot be worth that much!" optionally, citing reason Z, usually referring to past values or something pointless. You are really asking that, by asking why red letter watches fetch so much money, because you don't get it. I don't get it either, other than they look nice and are probably rarer. That is probably 80% of the reason, with the other 20% being beard stuff.

They are worth the money that the fetch for the simple reason that someone will pay it. Fans, collectors and investors like them... values on desirable items go up and down due to a number of factors. Values are up currently because interest rates are st. Look at the classic car market. It will all go pop and drop down again soon. Up and down. Forever.

Sheetmaself

5,676 posts

198 months

Sunday 1st January 2017
quotequote all
http://thumbsnap.com/6yxeiD83

Hows about this then, a steal at just $138,000 and that was a few years ago!

andy355

1,341 posts

238 months

Saturday 25th February 2017
quotequote all
If anyone is considering selling their red submariner please pm me. Looking to add one to go with my 1971 GMT

Name of user

176 posts

107 months

Saturday 25th February 2017
quotequote all
hosedoctor said:
Blown2CV said:
another of these fking threads.
It's a watch forum what do you expect you retard! LOL
Exactly, a watch forum, not a writing forum!

hosedoctor

664 posts

217 months

Sunday 26th February 2017
quotequote all
Name of user said:
hosedoctor said:
Blown2CV said:
another of these fking threads.
It's a watch forum what do you expect you retard! LOL
Exactly, a watch forum, not a writing forum!
What is the above supposed to even mean?

Blown2CV

28,811 posts

203 months

Thursday 2nd March 2017
quotequote all
hosedoctor said:
Name of user said:
hosedoctor said:
Blown2CV said:
another of these fking threads.
It's a watch forum what do you expect you retard! LOL
Exactly, a watch forum, not a writing forum!
What is the above supposed to even mean?
it's another one of these "i can't afford it so automatically anyone buying or liking one is a dick" threads.

hosedoctor

664 posts

217 months

Thursday 2nd March 2017
quotequote all
AAAh I see! LOL

Blown2CV

28,811 posts

203 months

Thursday 2nd March 2017
quotequote all
hosedoctor said:
AAAh I see! LOL
i did think i'd explained it a few posts up, a while back.

andy tims

5,578 posts

246 months

Friday 3rd March 2017
quotequote all
Blown2CV said:
it's another one of these "i can't afford it so automatically anyone buying or liking one is a dick" threads.
Dick or not, I love my 1680 Sub





Blown2CV

28,811 posts

203 months

Friday 3rd March 2017
quotequote all
andy tims said:
Blown2CV said:
it's another one of these "i can't afford it so automatically anyone buying or liking one is a dick" threads.
Dick or not, I love my 1680 Sub



well, you're not a dick and that's a lovely watch!

casbar

1,103 posts

215 months

Friday 3rd March 2017
quotequote all
Blown2CV said:
well, you're not a dick and that's a lovely watch!
+1, lovely watch

A common lawyer

319 posts

128 months

Friday 3rd March 2017
quotequote all
So it's just a decorative variation in older dials? I'm not a Rolex guy and I thought the colour went with a different movement/case shape or whatever.

Obviously, rarity is a plenty good enough reason to increase in value (like mis-printed stamps or whatever). Are there options on modern watches to change the colours of bits and pieces to make it more rare?

Sheetmaself

5,676 posts

198 months

Friday 3rd March 2017
quotequote all


Matching seadweller and submariner anyone?