Budget Sub lookalike?

Budget Sub lookalike?

Author
Discussion

andy_s

19,421 posts

260 months

Thursday 19th February 2009
quotequote all
http://www.chronocentric.com/omega/seamaster.shtml... re quartz vs automatic accuracy.

If you like plain, the Sinn UX is quartz and quite interesting...

Ranger 6

Original Poster:

7,065 posts

250 months

Thursday 19th February 2009
quotequote all
Invisible man said:
Budget must have increased a fair bit then, go for the Seamaster Quartz, it's a lovely watch and great quality for the price
Yup increased massively!! let's just say the negotiations involved sparkly shiny things wink

andy_s said:
http://www.chronocentric.com/omega/seamaster.shtml... re quartz vs automatic accuracy.

If you like plain, the Sinn UX is quartz and quite interesting...
Excellent info on that link - thanks!

I think it'll be the Quartz Seamaster - wait for the thread on where to get the best deal....

Seriously though - I've seen the discussions on high street discounts, is there any disadvantage with buying in airports? are they still cheaper than high street deals?

chrisr29

1,253 posts

198 months

Thursday 19th February 2009
quotequote all
King Rolex said:
you might as well just buy a fake
He's got a point, can get some bloody good fakes for a 100 quid or so.

Invisible man

39,731 posts

285 months

Thursday 19th February 2009
quotequote all
Good choice, wanna buy mine? then I can get one of these


BigAlinEmbra

1,629 posts

213 months

Thursday 19th February 2009
quotequote all
Mate at work has one of the seikos and every time I see it I think he's bought a sub.
Lovely watch imo.

DBRacingGod

610 posts

193 months

Friday 20th February 2009
quotequote all
The Seiko fooled our Polish cleaner who nicked it out of my Sub's box when she went on a mental thieving spree. In fact I had more people comment positively on the Seiko than the Rolex.

chris.mapey

4,778 posts

268 months

Friday 20th February 2009
quotequote all
chrisr29 said:
King Rolex said:
you might as well just buy a fake
He's got a point, can get some bloody good fakes for a 100 quid or so.
If you want a fake one, then get one - mine cost me £28 from an internet auction site that is rather like "Seek You Out" but with less letters wink

I have a few fakes (Heuer Monaco, Submariner, GMT Master II) - I view them as an extended test drive prior to purchase wink

I have a Breitling B1 that I love, and an original Omega Constellation (PiePan face) and keep deliberating about what else to add to the collection. I have bough a few fakes to check I like them, before chunking loads of cash out.

I have decided that I will get a Monaco, but will probably pass on a Sub, but may well get a GMT Master...

Total spent on fakes so far (for the 3) is £80 inc shipping.

HTH

Chris

Ranger 6

Original Poster:

7,065 posts

250 months

Friday 20th February 2009
quotequote all
Thanks Chris, have used that site before with good results smile

tnjjeffrey

81 posts

192 months

Friday 11th June 2010
quotequote all

tnjjeffrey

81 posts

192 months

Friday 11th June 2010
quotequote all
www.julesb.co.uk

also sell the real deal!

Revs_Addiction

2,090 posts

232 months

Friday 11th June 2010
quotequote all
Hi chap! How come do you need such astonishing accuracy? 10 sec/month is VERY stringent. Is it to do with the marshalling?

I think you might regret spending big money on a premium branded quartz and not going all the way and going for an automatic. A few seconds a day is a small price to pay for having a proper mechanical movement on your wrist, (in my eyes at least)! biggrin

wong

1,303 posts

217 months

Saturday 12th June 2010
quotequote all
Seiko do a quartz diver - SCBM 023 which is accurate to 20 secs a year. It has a 39mm case. But its Japan only
http://c-watch.co.jp/ww/s10a.html

Looks very similar to the SKX 007 (42mm case)

hilly10

7,166 posts

229 months

Saturday 12th June 2010
quotequote all
DBRacingGod said:
The Seiko fooled our Polish cleaner who nicked it out of my Sub's box when she went on a mental thieving spree. In fact I had more people comment positively on the Seiko than the Rolex.
That will teach her. Sorry but i did laugh when I read this

Odie

4,187 posts

183 months

Monday 14th June 2010
quotequote all
Ranger 6 said:
After some thought and deliberation the budget has increased and the 'look' preference is moving away from the sub lookalike, however the accuracy thing is something I can't get away from. I do appreciate a good movement and automatics would be on the list if I knew that they could hold time to within +/- 10 secs in a month.

So my question is do I go for something like this with a quartz mech or an automatic mech?


I know it's been described as fussy on a recent thread but I do like this too:


Would I be unrealistic to expect the sort of accuracy mentioned above from something like a Sinn 103?
I have a 14yo quarts seamaster ive just checked it and its gain 6 seconds in the last 4 months... Think i need to send it to be serviced and cleaned..

Ranger 6

Original Poster:

7,065 posts

250 months

Tuesday 15th June 2010
quotequote all
Revs_Addiction said:
Hi chap! How come do you need such astonishing accuracy? 10 sec/month is VERY stringent. Is it to do with the marshalling?

I think you might regret spending big money on a premium branded quartz and not going all the way and going for an automatic. A few seconds a day is a small price to pay for having a proper mechanical movement on your wrist, (in my eyes at least)! biggrin
Hi Andy,

Yes, the accuracy is due to the marshalling/rallying requirements. I need to be able to set it at the beginning of the event and it still be second perfect at the end, possibly 3 days later.

I have however sorted this by getting a Speedmaster cloud9 (Thanks Dom!) and a quartz beater smile Ultimately I still like the 'sub' look so am watching for something I can pick up for a reasonable price.

BluePurpleRed

1,137 posts

227 months

Wednesday 16th June 2010
quotequote all
Ranger 6 said:
Revs_Addiction said:
Hi chap! How come do you need such astonishing accuracy? 10 sec/month is VERY stringent. Is it to do with the marshalling?

I think you might regret spending big money on a premium branded quartz and not going all the way and going for an automatic. A few seconds a day is a small price to pay for having a proper mechanical movement on your wrist, (in my eyes at least)! biggrin
Hi Andy,

Yes, the accuracy is due to the marshalling/rallying requirements. I need to be able to set it at the beginning of the event and it still be second perfect at the end, possibly 3 days later.

I have however sorted this by getting a Speedmaster cloud9 (Thanks Dom!) and a quartz beater smile Ultimately I still like the 'sub' look so am watching for something I can pick up for a reasonable price.
There is a thread about Black watches on here, that features Steinhart..

http://www.steinhartwatches.de/index.php?id=67&amp...

Got to be right up your street?

Ranger 6

Original Poster:

7,065 posts

250 months

Wednesday 16th June 2010
quotequote all
Thanks - had seen that. Of all the homages the Steinhart appears to be one of the best. Unfortunately my budget is more along the lines of the £50 thread hehe

aquarianone

498 posts

178 months

Thursday 17th June 2010
quotequote all
check out the Orient Black Mako, superb value for money and something a bit different to the Seiko 5.

The real Apache

39,731 posts

285 months

Thursday 17th June 2010
quotequote all
good call, a very 'ansome watch that


Miguel Alvarez

4,944 posts

171 months

Thursday 17th June 2010
quotequote all
^^ That is very nice