Boeing are FINALLY about to deliver a 787!

Boeing are FINALLY about to deliver a 787!

Author
Discussion

thatone1967

Original Poster:

4,193 posts

192 months

Sunday 25th September 2011
quotequote all

Aizle

12,429 posts

176 months

Monday 26th September 2011
quotequote all
Checks the date........isn't April 1st.

Wow, better late than never, eh?!

Sifly

570 posts

179 months

Monday 26th September 2011
quotequote all
Check out the interior shots...............

A window in the Bog, whatever next?!! biglaugh

Most people p155 all over the floor as it is, and thats without the added distraction of a window to stare out of!!? irked

Turbodiesel1690

1,957 posts

171 months

Monday 26th September 2011
quotequote all
Sifly said:
Check out the interior shots...............

A window in the Bog, whatever next?!! biglaugh

Most people p155 all over the floor as it is, and thats without the added distraction of a window to stare out of!!? irked
BA 747s have a window in the first class lav, and sensor activated taps

Smiler.

11,752 posts

231 months

Monday 26th September 2011
quotequote all
Yeah, but how much is an M6 washer?

louiebaby

10,651 posts

192 months

Monday 26th September 2011
quotequote all
The Business Class section doesn't look like a very efficient use of space. Two seats with small shelves, and one with tow massive shelves...?

Doubt I'll need to worry about it though. smile

shirt

22,580 posts

202 months

Monday 26th September 2011
quotequote all
Turbodiesel1690 said:
Sifly said:
Check out the interior shots...............

A window in the Bog, whatever next?!! biglaugh

Most people p155 all over the floor as it is, and thats without the added distraction of a window to stare out of!!? irked
BA 747s have a window in the first class lav, and sensor activated taps
don't airbus have toilet windows? pretty sure it was an airbus [not a380] i was on t'other week and that had them in economy.

russ_a

4,581 posts

212 months

Monday 26th September 2011
quotequote all
When ever I see a 787 take off I always expect the wings to snap!

toppstuff

13,698 posts

248 months

Monday 26th September 2011
quotequote all
russ_a said:
When ever I see a 787 take off I always expect the wings to snap!
I sometimes worry if, lets say in about 10 years time when the first 787's are being run by outfits such as Tunisian Airways or Air Burkina Faso, we might find out what happens when they do...?



coanda

2,642 posts

191 months

Monday 26th September 2011
quotequote all
I do wonder if the authorities will become very strict about retiring aircraft.

I have the 'pleasure' of having read/modified/corrected calculation files for aircraft spanning 35 years from one major manufacturer. As time has moved on, there has been a drive to move weight out of aircraft designs via optimisation and understanding of methodologies. We are pushing analysis to hit adventurous weight targets, and this means that there will be less room for life extensions and so-on in 20 years time.

The differences in approach between the 787 and the 350 interest me. Boeing plumped for a very flexible wing. Looks like NASA's X-29 research wasn't in vain!

Number31

351 posts

224 months

Monday 26th September 2011
quotequote all
russ_a said:
When ever I see a 787 take off I always expect the wings to snap!
If you want to see it break follow the links on this page, it also shows the A380 and B777!

787 Cert Blog


Number31

Number31

351 posts

224 months

Monday 26th September 2011
quotequote all
coanda said:
I do wonder if the authorities will become very strict about retiring aircraft.

I have the 'pleasure' of having read/modified/corrected calculation files for aircraft spanning 35 years from one major manufacturer. As time has moved on, there has been a drive to move weight out of aircraft designs via optimisation and understanding of methodologies. We are pushing analysis to hit adventurous weight targets, and this means that there will be less room for life extensions and so-on in 20 years time.

The differences in approach between the 787 and the 350 interest me. Boeing plumped for a very flexible wing. Looks like NASA's X-29 research wasn't in vain!
I wouldn't worry about lifing issues, fuel burn and engine shop visit cost will drive obsolescence and drive aircraft retirals for these types.

Number31.

DJRC

23,563 posts

237 months

Monday 26th September 2011
quotequote all
Had my engine on aswell smile

eccles

13,740 posts

223 months

Monday 26th September 2011
quotequote all
Smiler. said:
Yeah, but how much is an M6 washer?
M6 on an American aircraft!...... They're still all imperial, so that'll be a 1/4 washer please! biggrin

coanda

2,642 posts

191 months

Monday 26th September 2011
quotequote all
eccles said:
M6 on an American aircraft!...... They're still all imperial, so that'll be a 1/4 washer please! biggrin
I thought it was US Customary Units? Slugs....euch.

russ_a

4,581 posts

212 months

Monday 26th September 2011
quotequote all
I guess Boeing don't want the aircraft to last more than 20 years, bad for sales!

Though as mentioned fuel economy will drive replacements, well that and environmental tax on older aircraft.


hyperblue

2,802 posts

181 months

Monday 26th September 2011
quotequote all
Ooh, economy class seats that recline in their own space. Excellent, I always seem to sit behind the guy who slams it back after take off, and only returns it when landing frown

The business class section isn't very easy on the eye though, very angular and contrasting colours.

coanda

2,642 posts

191 months

Tuesday 27th September 2011
quotequote all
I tend to think that extensions will be given wherever possible. I should think that a re-engine campaign will occur at least once during the life of these airframes. I'm interested to see if geared fan technology can be scaled up from single-aisle sized applications to ETOPS aircraft.

I think that there will be some very interesting through-life debates/issues with these aircraft concerning in-service damage and repairs, proof of efficiency, environmental concerns (in the sad event of a fire) and end of life concerns - it occurs to me that recycling a mainly-metallic aircraft is allot easier than recycling a mainly carbon airframe.


russ_a

4,581 posts

212 months

Tuesday 27th September 2011
quotequote all
I thought it was more plastic that carbon

AlexS

1,552 posts

233 months

Tuesday 27th September 2011
quotequote all
coanda said:
I tend to think that extensions will be given wherever possible. I should think that a re-engine campaign will occur at least once during the life of these airframes. I'm interested to see if geared fan technology can be scaled up from single-aisle sized applications to ETOPS aircraft.
The question is, whether there is any need. The GE engine on the 320-Neo is just as efficient as the P&W GTF and doesn't need to use any unusual technologies.