Red Arrows Incident

Author
Discussion

mrloudly

2,815 posts

236 months

Wednesday 9th November 2011
quotequote all
Ayahuasca said:
mrloudly said:
Anyone know what the previous reported seat fault was? I guess it wasn't in-advertant ejection or we'd have heard about it...
There were cracks in the frame.
Thanks. You'd have to hope not related to this latest incident. I'd guess the seats have all been checked (A.D. in the civi world) to eliminate this.


pacman1

7,322 posts

194 months

Wednesday 9th November 2011
quotequote all
I would be saddened if, on top of the year's earlier incident, it were to be a reason for the MOD to cut the RA displays.

We don't need another concorde moment.

Anyway, some more news below:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-15655865

Edited by pacman1 on Wednesday 9th November 21:26

Ian Lancs

1,127 posts

167 months

Wednesday 9th November 2011
quotequote all
Tallbut Buxomly said:
I suspect it is. If you consider the goings on with the first crash it seemed odd to me at the time that the pilot didnt eject and i am now wondering if it failed.
I doubt the seat had anything to do with the Bournmouth accident.

PaulG40

2,381 posts

226 months

Wednesday 9th November 2011
quotequote all
It didn't.

And Tornado has a mk10a seat and the hawk has a mk10b seat, that's why we are grounded too.


Edited by PaulG40 on Wednesday 9th November 23:04

DaveL485

2,758 posts

198 months

Saturday 19th November 2011
quotequote all
Good grief. I just saw on Facebook a friend post up about this chaps funeral today, in Coventry. I never realised before but a quick google after seeing that confirms it was indeed the Sean Cunningham I went to school with at Ernesford Grange School in Coventry.
Shocking! Shared classes all through secondary school, as well as 6th form. Still remember the face, clear as day.

frown

DaveL485

2,758 posts

198 months

Saturday 19th November 2011
quotequote all
Good grief. I just saw on Facebook a friend post up about this chaps funeral today, in Coventry. I never realised before but a quick google after seeing that confirms it was indeed the Sean Cunningham I went to school with at Ernesford Grange School in Coventry.
Shocking! Shared classes all through secondary school, as well as 6th form. Still remember the face, clear as day.

frown

y2blade

56,127 posts

216 months

Wednesday 29th January 2014
quotequote all
Inquest tweets from SkyNews just now:

https://twitter.com/SkyNewsBreak

Sky News Newsdesk ‏@SkyNewsBreak 4m
Inquest into death of Red Arrows pilot Sean Cunningham also concludes training omissions by the RAF contributed to death

Sky News Newsdesk ‏@SkyNewsBreak 5m
Inquest into Red Arrows pilot Sean Cunningham's death concludes serious communication failures by ejector seat manufacturer were a factor

frown


Simpo Two

85,538 posts

266 months

Wednesday 29th January 2014
quotequote all
From BBC news - essentially a double fail. Handle was not secured resuling in accidental ejection from the ground. That would have been bad enough but then the chute failed to open, resulting in the pilot falling from 220 feet; died from multiple injuries.

GadgeS3C

4,516 posts

165 months

Wednesday 29th January 2014
quotequote all
More on BBC - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-lincolnshire-...

As a professional engineer with no direct experience of the RAF or Martin-Baker (but a positive perception of both) it doesn't make very impressive reading.

dr_gn

16,169 posts

185 months

Wednesday 29th January 2014
quotequote all
If it's such a big deal with the seat itself, how come this type of accident hasn't happened before?

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

247 months

Wednesday 29th January 2014
quotequote all
dr_gn said:
If it's such a big deal with the seat itself, how come this type of accident hasn't happened before?
You only find out AFTER you've ejected - which is rare. If it's, say, a one in 100 chance of failure, that wouldn't be many failures.

But I agree, the Martin Baker angle to this story seems very odd. BBC reports they warned some users but not the RAF.

dr_gn

16,169 posts

185 months

Wednesday 29th January 2014
quotequote all
Ozzie Osmond said:
dr_gn said:
If it's such a big deal with the seat itself, how come this type of accident hasn't happened before?
You only find out AFTER you've ejected - which is rare. If it's, say, a one in 100 chance of failure, that wouldn't be many failures.

But I agree, the Martin Baker angle to this story seems very odd. BBC reports they warned some users but not the RAF.
Yeah, seems to imply that M-B were aware of a potential issue, but only told certain operators. Bizarre if true.

steve j

3,223 posts

229 months

Wednesday 29th January 2014
quotequote all
After fitting hundreds of seats, I do not believe for one moment that the seat pan firing handle was at fault. I`ve just seen the news and it showed a partially pulled handle with the safety pin through the handle and not in the housing. When the seat is fitted, it is checked three times ! Then every time a pilot crews in, the pins are checked again. I recall sabotage on a seat when I served on Phantoms and I suspect in this case.

Leptons

5,114 posts

177 months

Wednesday 29th January 2014
quotequote all
Pretty shocking that the parachute didn't deploy. Can anyone shed any light on this 'nut and bolt' arrangement?

IanMorewood

4,309 posts

249 months

Wednesday 29th January 2014
quotequote all
Sad set of events that all happened to the same unfortunate young man.

RobGT81

5,229 posts

187 months

Thursday 30th January 2014
quotequote all
steve j said:
After fitting hundreds of seats, I do not believe for one moment that the seat pan firing handle was at fault. I`ve just seen the news and it showed a partially pulled handle with the safety pin through the handle and not in the housing. When the seat is fitted, it is checked three times ! Then every time a pilot crews in, the pins are checked again. I recall sabotage on a seat when I served on Phantoms and I suspect in this case.
Can the seat pan firing hardly be partially pulled without it firing the seat? Hard to imagine but seems to be what they are implying?

Surely if a bolt is over torqued then that is a maintenance error? If MB supply a torque then I don't see how its their fault when it has been "over tightened"

dr_gn

16,169 posts

185 months

Thursday 30th January 2014
quotequote all
RobGT81 said:
steve j said:
After fitting hundreds of seats, I do not believe for one moment that the seat pan firing handle was at fault. I`ve just seen the news and it showed a partially pulled handle with the safety pin through the handle and not in the housing. When the seat is fitted, it is checked three times ! Then every time a pilot crews in, the pins are checked again. I recall sabotage on a seat when I served on Phantoms and I suspect in this case.
Can the seat pan firing hardly be partially pulled without it firing the seat? Hard to imagine but seems to be what they are implying?

Surely if a bolt is over torqued then that is a maintenance error? If MB supply a torque then I don't see how its their fault when it has been "over tightened"
If a bolt torque alone can cause a fatal fault, then it's a bad design. Simple as that.

I'd be amazed if it is as simple as that though.

RobGT81

5,229 posts

187 months

Thursday 30th January 2014
quotequote all
dr_gn said:
If a bolt torque alone can cause a fatal fault, then it's a bad design. Simple as that.

I'd be amazed if it is as simple as that though.
Surely any bolt incorrectly torqued can be fatal. Do a main wheel nut up too tight, it won't spin. Not enough torque and it drops off or rattles around until it drops off.

dr_gn

16,169 posts

185 months

Thursday 30th January 2014
quotequote all
RobGT81 said:
dr_gn said:
If a bolt torque alone can cause a fatal fault, then it's a bad design. Simple as that.

I'd be amazed if it is as simple as that though.
Surely any bolt incorrectly torqued can be fatal.
Errr, no.

RobGT81

5,229 posts

187 months

Thursday 30th January 2014
quotequote all
dr_gn said:
Errr, no.
Why bother with torque figures then? You don't just grolly something up until you think its right.