Catalina - the flying yacht
Discussion
Fishtigua said:
Jimmy Buffett, the Parrot-head singer, had one as a 'yacht'. Well his uncle is Warren Buffett, the billionair.
I am fairly sure they aren't related. Jimmy Buffett had/has a Grumman HU-16C Albatross. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hemisphere_DancerBoatbuoy said:
I hate it when people use acronyms.
Don't blame me, blame the US Navy.And it's all explained in the other thread.
But if you're too lazy to look, I'll explain it here too -
The old US Navy's designation system (prior to 1962) was tortuous.
Each airframe manufacturer was given a company code letter.
Each aircraft role was given a code letter or letters.
And each individual aircraft was given a number based on the number of different types that had been ordered from the particular manufacturer.
For instance, Grumman had the letter "F". Thus the Wildcat was designated the F4F which worked out as "F" for Fighter, "4" for the 4th Grumman design ordered by the Navy and "F" for Grumman.
The Douglas Devastator was the TBD, with "TB" for Torpedo Bomber and "D" for Douglas.
The Avenger was TBF, if built by Grumman or TBM, if built by General Motors.
The famous DC-3 was known as the R4D in Navy service. It was the C-47 in USAAF service.
In the specific example of the PBY,
PB stood for Patrol Boat
Y was the US Navy's designator for the Consolidated Aircraft Company , the manufacturers.
Simpo Two said:
So what would our a/c - Spitfire, Hurricane, Lancaster, Mosquito etc look like with US-style names?
I suppose a Spitfire would be P-something-S (for Supermarine)...?
It would depend on who was operating it as to what designation system it would have ended up under. As it is, the US did operate a number of British types during World War 2 (Spitfire, Beaufighter, Mosquito etc are good examples) and they didn't allocate these aircraft any sort of designation other than their names as given by the British.I suppose a Spitfire would be P-something-S (for Supermarine)...?
The manufacturer's letter given on US Navy aircraft was not based on the first letter of the company name. It was just a letter given in order of allocation by the US Navy Bureau of Aeronautics
F - Grumman
D - Douglas (a coincidence)
Y - Consolidated
A - Brewster
Ginetta G15 Girl said:
Because, of course, it's not an acronym is it?
At best it is an initialisation.
At worst it is a code.
I like to think of it as a TLA.
What we really need is a thread explaining the difference between an acronym and an abbreviation.At best it is an initialisation.
At worst it is a code.
I like to think of it as a TLA.
All acronyms are abbreviations. Not all abbreviations are acronyms.
It's a great pity the link I started this thread with no longer works and the photos have gone. That's the danger of the internet - lots of amazing/valuable info there one day - pfft, gone the next. Cloud or no Cloud, it doesn't bode well I think for the long term archival of important things.
Ok so a new link with some gratuitous flying yacht pictures and the odd young lady wearing a bikini, finishes with some pictures of Kendalls derelict PBY.
http://www.messynessychic.com/2014/04/24/all-aboar...
http://www.messynessychic.com/2014/04/24/all-aboar...
Edited by IanMorewood on Monday 19th January 19:25
Gassing Station | Boats, Planes & Trains | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff