Costa Concordia What will happen to it now?

Costa Concordia What will happen to it now?

Author
Discussion

paolow

3,209 posts

258 months

Tuesday 17th January 2012
quotequote all
AlexiusG55 said:
If it counts as having sunk then it certainly will be- it's immensely bad luck to put a salvaged ship back into service without renaming it. Of course, it probably will be renamed anyway- cruise ships are renamed at the drop of a hat...
Its also very bad luck to rename a ship for any reason so clearly they are a bit stuck either way....

Rich1973

1,198 posts

177 months

Tuesday 17th January 2012
quotequote all
Just heard on the radio that explosives are now being used on the side of the ship to make areas accessable to divers that havn't been up to now....

Jaguar steve

9,232 posts

210 months

Tuesday 17th January 2012
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
AlexiusG55 said:
Of course, it probably will be renamed anyway- cruise ships are renamed at the drop of a hat...
Indeed - heading across the Cook Strait (between the North and South islands of New Zealand) I was surprised to see under the ferry's name 'Pride of Cherbourg'!
You weren't helping out with navigation on a day trip to France were you? I know you river cruising types tend to get lost if the bank is more than twenty feet away wink

Simpo Two

85,470 posts

265 months

Tuesday 17th January 2012
quotequote all
Jaguar steve said:
You weren't helping out with navigation on a day trip to France were you? I know you river cruising types tend to get lost if the bank is more than twenty feet away wink
Now you mention it it did seem to take a long time to get to the other side...

I was surprised that a channel ferry was up to a semi-circumnavigation of the world; didn't think they were designed for ocean crossings.

Huntsman

8,054 posts

250 months

Tuesday 17th January 2012
quotequote all
I think the ship that fell over at Zeebrugge was in service for many years later.

Concordia - quick T cut and it'll be fine!

mickrick

3,700 posts

173 months

Tuesday 17th January 2012
quotequote all
Just been watching the news, and they played a recording of the conversation between the captain and rescue services.
The fker was one of the first off, and wouldn't get back on board, he couldn't even tell the MRC how many people where on board.

I take back my previous comment about him being in jail.
He should be publicly excecuted for cowardice! I'd like to tell him right now to his face too. fker. furious

And breathe..........

AlexiusG55

655 posts

156 months

Tuesday 17th January 2012
quotequote all
paolow said:
AlexiusG55 said:
If it counts as having sunk then it certainly will be- it's immensely bad luck to put a salvaged ship back into service without renaming it. Of course, it probably will be renamed anyway- cruise ships are renamed at the drop of a hat...
Its also very bad luck to rename a ship for any reason so clearly they are a bit stuck either way....
Ships that sink are the exception to that rule- the USS Squalus sank in 1939 due to a valve failure and was renamed Sailfish after being salvaged. The new captain had to threaten to maroon anyone caught using the word "Squalus" on board!

Similarly, the RN lost HMS Thetis in 1939. Thetis was renamed Thunderbolt after being salvaged- then became one of the few vessels to sink with all hands TWICE in 1943.

spitfire-ian

3,841 posts

228 months

Tuesday 17th January 2012
quotequote all
Huntsman said:
I think the ship that fell over at Zeebrugge was in service for many years later.
No, after the salvage it was renamed Flushing Range and towed off to be scrapped.

Gaspowered

311 posts

165 months

Tuesday 17th January 2012
quotequote all
You'll probably find that ships are no longer scrapped in the way most people imagine, ie dragged up a beach somewhere in Pakistan, but 'recycled'. The hull and equipment carefully and safely cut up and where possible reused (ok may not be possible with salt water damage). The cost of recycling is around the same as the scrap value of the steel, so the company may not get any scrap value from the vessel

Simpo Two

85,470 posts

265 months

Tuesday 17th January 2012
quotequote all
mickrick said:
The fker was one of the first off, and wouldn't get back on board, he couldn't even tell the MRC how many people where on board.
It does seem odd how Western captains generally do the 'women and children first' and are last to leave, whilst those from certain other countries simply leg it on the first lifeboat...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/i...

scarebus

858 posts

171 months

Tuesday 17th January 2012
quotequote all
A member of the Smit salvage team was interviewed yesterday and asked the same question. He said the vessel was too large and will need to be cut into sections and then removed.
This involves placing a large chain around the ship and then pulled in a circular motion, the turning forces and friction will cut through the entire cross section.
This process will likely take 3-4 months to complete.

As for theories about righting and floating her would be near on impossible. She weighs 115,000 Tonnes and has approximately 1000 cabin windows, balconies, port holes and breaches in the hull. The forces required to pull her upright would easily over whelm the delicate upper super structure.

A very sad sight indeed.

Simpo Two

85,470 posts

265 months

Tuesday 17th January 2012
quotequote all
scarebus said:
She weighs 115,000 Tonnes
Bloody hell, even the battleship Yamato was only 65,000 tons!

scarebus

858 posts

171 months

Tuesday 17th January 2012
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Bloody hell, even the battleship Yamato was only 65,000 tons!
Titanic only weighed 48,000 tonnes

But the Costa Concordia is a baby compared to this monster Allure of the Seas 225,000(GT)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Allure_of_the_se...

XB70

2,482 posts

196 months

Tuesday 17th January 2012
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
It does seem odd how Western captains generally do the 'women and children first' and are last to leave, whilst those from certain other countries simply leg it on the first lifeboat...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/i...
And post Titanic, left a large number of families without the breadwinner.


H100S

Original Poster:

1,436 posts

173 months

Tuesday 17th January 2012
quotequote all
scarebus said:
Titanic only weighed 48,000 tonnes

But the Costa Concordia is a baby compared to this monster Allure of the Seas 225,000(GT)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Allure_of_the_se...
Wow, that is one ugly cruise ship!

MOTORVATOR

6,993 posts

247 months

Tuesday 17th January 2012
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
It does seem odd how Western captains generally do the 'women and children first' and are last to leave, whilst those from certain other countries simply leg it on the first lifeboat...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/i...
Your opinions on this matter are duly noted and Bacardi and I will take comfort in this when invited on board HMS Simpo.




idea







If I wear a skirt can I go before Bacardi? biggrin

Simpo Two

85,470 posts

265 months

Tuesday 17th January 2012
quotequote all
MOTORVATOR said:
If I wear a skirt can I go before Bacardi? biggrin
Rats leaving the sinking ship eh?

Never fear, the river is only 3" deep and the banks are but a light spring away smile

dvs_dave

8,636 posts

225 months

Wednesday 18th January 2012
quotequote all
spitfire-ian said:
Huntsman said:
I think the ship that fell over at Zeebrugge was in service for many years later.
No, after the salvage it was renamed Flushing Range and towed off to be scrapped.
However her sister ship (now MS Anthi Marina), post a jumboisation and new bow, still plies the Aegean. Saw her looking a bit scruffy in Piraeus a couple of years ago. Also saw the Concordia looking rather better at the same time.

XJSJohn

15,966 posts

219 months

Wednesday 18th January 2012
quotequote all
It will probably be patched, and dragged to a yard somewhere in Asia, where it will be refitted and a Casino ship and put into operation somewhere in Asia, no doubt renamed something auspicious like "Lucky Dragon" or some such!

One of the China / SE Asia cruise operators is going to get a cut price modern cruise ship to add to their fleet of old nags

Jaguar steve

9,232 posts

210 months

Wednesday 18th January 2012
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Jaguar steve said:
You weren't helping out with navigation on a day trip to France were you? I know you river cruising types tend to get lost if the bank is more than twenty feet away wink
Now you mention it it did seem to take a long time to get to the other side...

I was surprised that a channel ferry was up to a semi-circumnavigation of the world; didn't think they were designed for ocean crossings.
Providing there's enough beer on board you can sail almost anything almost anywhere with seamanship and batten down the hatches heavy weather handling skills. Apart perhaps from the enough beer on board bit that's somthing else you river cruisng types... oh never mind biggrin