Apache Crash in Afghanistan - "Return to target" maneuver

Apache Crash in Afghanistan - "Return to target" maneuver

Author
Discussion

Turbodiesel1690

1,957 posts

171 months

Thursday 22nd March 2012
quotequote all
Wow eek dramatic video, expensive & career ending error

Fat Albert

1,392 posts

182 months

Thursday 22nd March 2012
quotequote all
Actual density decreases as Density Altitude goes 'up' (so your blades and engine do not work as well as they should 'lower' down)

in a well-executed wing-over the G forces should be absolutely neutral as the aircraft is kept in balance all the way around...this wasn't always the case when the studes were having a bash, and you would experience some lightness as you went over the top.

The 2 worst maneuvres for G in the back were the fast spiral descent where we wanted to get through the small-arms fire zone quickly, so the captain would 'bank and yank' which made moving around in the cabin impossible...I would normally end up just kneeling in the doorway and hanging on (if you watch the Mike Brewer thing on Afghanistan you see the ramp gunner fall over as they do this!)

At the opposite end of the scale if you were wandering around when the Captain put it into Autorotation you would end up with your back against the ceiling as the chopper entered free-fall and then would collapse onto a heap on the floor when they checked the Rotor RPM with the collective...again the studes would add an extra dimension by forgetting the torque reaction and doing a bit of fish-tailing throwing you from side-side!

My worst one was when I missed the grab-handle as I swapped from the bubble window on the Port side to the door-way. Luckily I had my monkey harness on and ended up crumpled up on the step. Once my instructor had stopped laughing he helped me back in...he said that it looked like I just stood up and 'Super-manned' out of the door!

fatboy69

9,373 posts

188 months

Thursday 22nd March 2012
quotequote all
This accident happened back in February however the US military tried to cover it up. Unfortunately for them there is such a thing as YouTube!!

eccles

13,740 posts

223 months

Thursday 22nd March 2012
quotequote all
Max_Torque said:
I think i'm right in saying most military 'copters now have vertical G limiters built into the seats for just such an eventuality? (i.e. a shear pin system that allows the seat to "submarine" in a controlled fashion and hence limit the max G the pilot receives in the crucial vertical plane ?)
The Apache has shock absorbers on the crew seats to reduce the impact in heavy landings. Main gear legs and the gun turret are all collapsible for just such incidences as this crash.

mrloudly

2,815 posts

236 months

Friday 23rd March 2012
quotequote all
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-17481023

What are they on! "Spins wildly out of control" What????

tenohfive

6,276 posts

183 months

Friday 23rd March 2012
quotequote all
mrloudly said:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-17481023

What are they on! "Spins wildly out of control" What????
00.21 - 00.23 probably. It looks an awful lot like that's the main body of the Apache spinning through the air after impact.

daz3210

5,000 posts

241 months

Friday 23rd March 2012
quotequote all
But that isn't exactly spinning out of control is it? More like gaining a mind of its own after crashing.

tenohfive

6,276 posts

183 months

Friday 23rd March 2012
quotequote all
The Apache was spinning whilst out of control, wasn't it? The fact that the loss of control came at the point of impact (rather than prior to, as you may have expected) doesn't make it an incorrect statement. And I don't really see why it matters - it's a dramatic headline to draw attention to a (rightly) dramatic video.

mrloudly

2,815 posts

236 months

Friday 23rd March 2012
quotequote all
Apparently "It spins wildly out of control before bouncing on the snow" Since when has a stall turn being "Wildly out of control"?
Looks like he screwed up, hit the floor and then spun (as part of the crash). IMHO it looked in controlled flight right up to the point where
it met Terra-Firma...

tenohfive

6,276 posts

183 months

Friday 23rd March 2012
quotequote all
It actually says, "The helicopter can be seen flying low over buildings before it spins out of control." Which is a bit misleading - hitting the ground is a bit of an omission.

It does look like the Apache's reputation for being a flying tank is well deserved.


eccles

13,740 posts

223 months

Friday 23rd March 2012
quotequote all
tenohfive said:
It does look like the Apache's reputation for being a flying tank is well deserved.
I think the flying tank thing is more to do with fire power than structural strength. Apart from a bit of armour around the crew and a few vital bits the Apache isn't an especially strong airframe and is purposely made of thin metal to let bullets pass through it instead of bouncing around inside.

mrmr96

13,736 posts

205 months

Friday 23rd March 2012
quotequote all
eccles said:
I think the flying tank thing is more to do with fire power than structural strength. Apart from a bit of armour around the crew and a few vital bits the Apache isn't an especially strong airframe and is purposely made of thin metal to let bullets pass through it instead of bouncing around inside.
"...to let bullets pass through". Doesn't sound like a very good design IMO - bullets should be kept out shirly?

Munter

31,319 posts

242 months

Friday 23rd March 2012
quotequote all
mrmr96 said:
"...to let bullets pass through". Doesn't sound like a very good design IMO - bullets should be kept out shirly?
I understand that the russians armoured the floor of their helicopters after experience of bullets coming through the bottom.

When they decided to fly down the vallys in Afghanistan they were getting shot from above which then bounced up off the armour. It would have been better if they had passed through.

Rotary Madness

2,285 posts

187 months

Friday 23rd March 2012
quotequote all
The guys on ARRSE recon it only needed 4 new blades, the tyres pumping up and it was pretty much good to go again! If thats true theyre bloody tough.

bravonovember

774 posts

177 months

Friday 23rd March 2012
quotequote all
Rotary Madness said:
The guys on ARRSE recon it only needed 4 new blades, the tyres pumping up and it was pretty much good to go again! If thats true theyre bloody tough.
I done how think he is talking out of his ARRSE!

bravonovember

774 posts

177 months

Friday 23rd March 2012
quotequote all
Rotary Madness said:
The guys on ARRSE recon it only needed 4 new blades, the tyres pumping up and it was pretty much good to go again! If thats true theyre bloody tough.
I some how think he is talking out of his ARRSE!

Mister V

1,106 posts

201 months

Friday 23rd March 2012
quotequote all
Rotary Madness said:
The guys on ARRSE recon it only needed 4 new blades, the tyres pumping up and it was pretty much good to go again! If thats true theyre bloody tough.
Eh? doesn't the entire tail section come off?

Zaxxon

4,057 posts

161 months

Friday 23rd March 2012
quotequote all
Perhaps a bit of a joke like, 'bit of T-cut, that'll buff out' etc etc.

SlipStream77

2,153 posts

192 months

Friday 23rd March 2012
quotequote all
The tail rotor has four blades so I suppose it is possible.

Rotary Madness

2,285 posts

187 months

Friday 23rd March 2012
quotequote all
Just watched it again in detail. you can see the tail rotor blades are fked, but when he comes down for the final time he seems to hit belly first, so it could be true!