Britain's longest aircraft runway ?

Britain's longest aircraft runway ?

Author
Discussion

AAGR

Original Poster:

918 posts

161 months

Wednesday 6th June 2012
quotequote all
Not long ago I met a recently retired senior RAF officer, whose last job had included responsibility for keeping a handful of very long runways in good condition 'in case the Space Shuttle ever needed them'.

He wasn't joking either - apparently the MoD had an agreement with the Americans on such matters.

OK, question ? Which are Britain's longest runways, and how long are they ? I'm guessing that this explains why otherwise-redundant runways like those at Bruntingthorpe, Alconbury Hill, and that 'secret' one at Machrihanish in Scotland are kept in such good condition ? Or are we talking about Fairford, perhaps ?

Waspy1

2,983 posts

176 months

Wednesday 6th June 2012
quotequote all
Fairford is two and a quarter miles I believe. It was indeed a enmergency landing site for the shuttle.

Sgt Bilko

1,929 posts

215 months

Wednesday 6th June 2012
quotequote all
Boscombe Down 3101 meters
Then Brize Norton at 3050 meters

tvrolet

4,262 posts

282 months

Wednesday 6th June 2012
quotequote all
Machrihanish was sold last month for £1...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west...

oh, and the runway is 3,049 m (10,003 ft) long, and was certified to accept the shuttle (so says Wiki).

Edited by tvrolet on Wednesday 6th June 15:39

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 6th June 2012
quotequote all
How long is Woodbridge?

Sgt Bilko

1,929 posts

215 months

blueg33

35,808 posts

224 months

Wednesday 6th June 2012
quotequote all
wikkipedia said:
RAF Fairford was the only TransOceanic Abort Landing site for NASA's Space Shuttle in the UK. As well as having a sufficiently long runway for a shuttle landing (the runway is 3,046 m (9,993 ft) long), it also had NASA-trained fire and medical crews stationed on the airfield.

Life Saab Itch

37,068 posts

188 months

Wednesday 6th June 2012
quotequote all
RAF Upper Heyford?

petemurphy

10,117 posts

183 months

Wednesday 6th June 2012
quotequote all
pretty sure the runway hammond crashed in york on is a shuttle emergency one. i should know the name seeing as my uncle owns the farm next to it!

Sgt Bilko

1,929 posts

215 months

Wednesday 6th June 2012
quotequote all
Life Saab Itch said:
RAF Upper Heyford?
It would take a while to shift all the cars stored there.

Cheib

23,216 posts

175 months

Wednesday 6th June 2012
quotequote all
tvrolet said:
Machrihanish was sold last month for £1...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west...

oh, and the runway is 3,049 m (10,003 ft) long, and was certified to accept the shuttle (so says Wiki).

Edited by tvrolet on Wednesday 6th June 15:39
I've flown in there on a turboprop from Glasgow....I doubt we used a tenth of the runway!

Nothing to do with the OP's question but Banjul airpot in The Gambia used to be a shuttle landing site, according to Wiki it's 3600m.

paulshears

804 posts

197 months

Wednesday 6th June 2012
quotequote all
petemurphy said:
pretty sure the runway hammond crashed in york on is a shuttle emergency one. i should know the name seeing as my uncle owns the farm next to it!
Elvington

petemurphy

10,117 posts

183 months

Wednesday 6th June 2012
quotequote all
petemurphy said:
pretty sure the runway hammond crashed in york on is a shuttle emergency one. i should know the name seeing as my uncle owns the farm next to it!
edited to say 3000 metres and its elvington airfield

http://www.elvingtonairfield.co.uk/

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 6th June 2012
quotequote all
Cheib said:
tvrolet said:
Machrihanish was sold last month for £1...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west...

oh, and the runway is 3,049 m (10,003 ft) long, and was certified to accept the shuttle (so says Wiki).

Edited by tvrolet on Wednesday 6th June 15:39
I've flown in there on a turboprop from Glasgow....I doubt we used a tenth of the runway!

Nothing to do with the OP's question but Banjul airpot in The Gambia used to be a shuttle landing site, according to Wiki it's 3600m.
I was about to take off from there years ago but had to stop because a group of monkeys decided to cross the runway. They were just sitting there scratching their arses and enjoying the day. I called the control tower and after about 10 mins of trying to explain why I wasn't taking off they eventually sent someone out to clear them away in a knackered old puegeot estate. hehe If you landed a shuttle there it really must be an emergency.

Tango13

8,423 posts

176 months

Wednesday 6th June 2012
quotequote all
The question is, what would NASA have done if the shuttle had landed there? A couple of big cranes and a lot of faffing about to get it on the back of the 747 I'd imagine.

E31Shrew

5,921 posts

192 months

Wednesday 6th June 2012
quotequote all
Manston, where I spent many happy hours asleep, was / is 2750 metres. Again it was at one time put forward as an emergency runway for the space shuttle.

blueg33

35,808 posts

224 months

Wednesday 6th June 2012
quotequote all
NASA said:
3. EMERGENCY LANDING SITES:

Amberley, Australia
Amilear Cabral, Cape Berde
Arlanda, Sweden
Darwin, Australia
Dyess AFB, TX (1)
Ellsworth AFB, SD (1),(3)
Esenboga, Turkey
Gran Canaria (Las Palmas), Canary Islands
Grant County (Moses Lake), WA (3)
Hao, French Polynesia
Hoedspruit, South Africa
King Khalid, Saudi Arabia
Kinshasa, Zaire
Koln/ Bonn, Germany
Lajes Field, Azores (1),(6)
Lincoln Municipal, NE (3)
Mountain Home AFB, ID (1), (3)
Nassau, Bahamas (2)
NSA Souda Bay, Crete (1),(6)
NSF Diego Garcia, Chagos Archipelago, Indian Ocean (1)
Orlando IAP, FL
RAF Fairford, United Kingdom (1),(4)
Roberts International (Monrovia), Liberia
Tamanrassett, Algeria
Fairford is the only UK emergency landing site I can find listed

petemurphy

10,117 posts

183 months

Wednesday 6th June 2012
quotequote all
The runway at Elvington is over 2 miles long and it was held on care and maintenance as an emergency landing area for the Space Shuttle if ever such an emergency developed

http://www.largemodelassociation.com/elvington_201...

Eric Mc

121,958 posts

265 months

Wednesday 6th June 2012
quotequote all
The Shuttle had dozens of emergency landing sites all over the world. These sites varied depending on the nature of the mission and the orbital inclination that was needed for each mission.

Most missions prior to the building of the ISS and ISS supply missions had orbital planes closer to the equator and as a result none of the UK or Northern European runways would have been within gliding range of the Shuttle.
The ISS has a 51% degree inclination to the equator so missions to the ISS meant that the Shuttle was in range of Northern European and British runways.
Columbia was too heavy to be put on high inclination orbits so was never used on ISS missions and could never have landed in the UK.

In the original plan, Shuttles would have flown 90% Pole to Pole flights, launched from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California. This means that any airfield on the planet with a long enough runway was a potentlial landing runway for these polar missions.

After Challenger was destroyed, all plans to use Vandenberg were cancelled and no polar orbital flights were ever undertaken.

captainzep

13,305 posts

192 months

Wednesday 6th June 2012
quotequote all
E31Shrew said:
Manston, where I spent many happy hours asleep, was / is 2750 metres. Again it was at one time put forward as an emergency runway for the space shuttle.
Current emergency plans exist for Manston because they are big enough and local to receive Jumbos that can't land at Gatwick/Heathrow IIRC.

Anyone living in Ramsgate is well aware of the big Russian freight jets that loom in the skies from time to time.