RE: Vulcan to be grounded

Author
Discussion

DiscoColin

3,328 posts

214 months

Friday 12th October 2012
quotequote all
I think that we all saw this day coming and hoped that it would be further away. Well done to the guys for keeping it up there as long as they have and giving me the chance to see it in its natural habitat again - when she is grounded, Vulcan will lie third in my all time list of planes that I miss being able to see in the air again behind Concorde and Blackbird frown

P4ROT

1,219 posts

193 months

Friday 12th October 2012
quotequote all
I was dead square underneath it when it flew over in that last image (just behind the supercar paddock where they have the really old cars)- looking up and seeing the sky disappear, replaced by two MASSIVE open bomb bay doors, remains one of the most amazing experiences of my life....

DiscoColin

3,328 posts

214 months

Friday 12th October 2012
quotequote all
BLUETHUNDER said:
Some of our taxes should be going to keep historic aircraft with a strong national heritage in the air. Rather than some of the crap they do with our money.
Erm - they are. Battle of Britain memorial flight operates 12 aircraft at the taxpayers expense and while a charity, the Royal Navy historic flight is partially subsidised with the availability of some Navy resources/facilities. The thing that makes this possible is the public will to support the heritage of the second world war, whereas a hugely more expensive cold war aircraft designed to drop nuclear weapons on the Soviet Union is always going to be a tougher sell to the element of the public that would sooner see the money spent on mundane st that will have no historic relevance beyond the following week frown

This is actually one of those rare cases where you can't really pin it on the politicians - it is the public. If it was a vote winner then you can be your arse that any politician of any allegiance would find the money and make it happen. As things are, I reckon that the only person in politics who could spin such a thing without being hounded out of office would be (love him or hate him) Boris.

Cobnapint

8,625 posts

151 months

Friday 12th October 2012
quotequote all
Used to watch this with my chest vibrating from the noise in the late seventies at the Stoughton air show in Leicestershire, back in the days when they REALLY used to stand the thing on its wing tips during a display, with the haunting whale-like noise from the resonance on the air intakes resounding in my ears.

Bloodcurdingly brilliant. Can't we divert a bit of foreign aid in the direction of this masterpiece? I'm sure a few corrupt foreign leaders can go without their 'please be our friend' international bribery money for a few weeks...

Famous Graham

26,553 posts

225 months

Friday 12th October 2012
quotequote all
J98 said:
Shame to see it get grounded, hopefully some very rich aero enthusiast feels like parting with some cash.
On another note, I can't believe it's been back in the air for five years.
When I was little my Dad used to take me to see it when it was still in bits, went to the first public flight it did in 07, seen it virtually every year since, the atmosphere at that first flight was surreal.
I was going to have a go there and say it wasn't 07, don't be daft, it was much more recent than that.

Then I checked. Where's the time gone?

Anyway, as for the news frown

Hooli

32,278 posts

200 months

Friday 12th October 2012
quotequote all
Cobnapint said:
Bloodcurdingly brilliant. Can't we divert a bit of foreign aid in the direction of this masterpiece? I'm sure a few corrupt foreign leaders can go without their 'please be our friend' international bribery money for a few weeks...
yes A decent use of tax money.

aeropilot

34,526 posts

227 months

Friday 12th October 2012
quotequote all
Dangermouse78 said:
No more airworthy engines... surely they can use the Concorde engines... they're basicly the same, they could at least take the bits they need
No they can't, as they arn't the same (not that there are Concorde engines available either, even if they could use them)

ChrisP T5

15 posts

152 months

Friday 12th October 2012
quotequote all
DiscoColin said:
Erm - they are. Battle of Britain memorial flight operates 12 aircraft at the taxpayers expense and while a charity, the Royal Navy historic flight is partially subsidised with the availability of some Navy resources/facilities. The thing that makes this possible is the public will to support the heritage of the second world war, whereas a hugely more expensive cold war aircraft designed to drop nuclear weapons on the Soviet Union is always going to be a tougher sell to the element of the public that would sooner see the money spent on mundane st that will have no historic relevance beyond the following week frown

This is actually one of those rare cases where you can't really pin it on the politicians - it is the public. If it was a vote winner then you can be your arse that any politician of any allegiance would find the money and make it happen. As things are, I reckon that the only person in politics who could spin such a thing without being hounded out of office would be (love him or hate him) Boris.
Unfortunately 'DiscoColin' is exactly correct.... though it should annoy any 'bloke' with any interest in anything mechanical (witness all the recent programs on BBC channels about UK engineering heritage)

Reason why it should be preserved - flying...is because the Vulcan design is pretty much unique (US B1 excepted)...and its British!. It is part of our engineering heritage..along with bloomin' stationary steam engines...locomotives...cars (eh? - on PH?..)and all the other stuff that gets preserved, so we should be proud of it!.

Unfortunately the only media coverage I've ever seen of it - was on an early evening programme, done by John Sargeant (I cant remember the one it was) - so yes the general public is completely ignorant of its demise or its greatness

I have contributed to the cause - and yes its entirely volunteer funded...no lottery...some small business funding (there was even an american firm that found an unused fuelling cart and donated it along the way...)

For impact on how huge/great/impressive a Vulcan is - I recommend the RAF museum at Hendon... we took our kids along years ago, you walk into one hall...with loads of small plane exhibits at eye level. They asked 'Why's it so dark..?' - just told them to look up.... most of the halls exhibits are fitted under the wings of a Vulcan (on its long stalk like landing gear)...the moment of silence,awe,and then appreciation of the size of the thing was priceless.

CambsBill

1,926 posts

178 months

Friday 12th October 2012
quotequote all
bad company said:
We had Vulcans when I served at RAF Waddington in the 1970's. They were taking off & landing all day but I never got bored with watching.
My old man was flying them out of Waddington in those days - my formative years were spent watching them fly overhead virtually every day, with the occasional treat of the Lancaster that was based there at that time as well.

Seen 558 a number of times over the years, most memorably flying over the house a couple of summers ago at very low level. I shall miss her frown

Podie

46,630 posts

275 months

Friday 12th October 2012
quotequote all
Shame. Another part of my childhood disappears...

Skodaku

1,805 posts

219 months

Friday 12th October 2012
quotequote all
Elroy Blue said:
Save the money and get a Shackleton back in the air. Four RR Griffons sound awsome.
And a Mosquito.

And an EE Lightning.

Cobnapint

8,625 posts

151 months

Friday 12th October 2012
quotequote all
Ecclestone. Branson. Lottery winners. YOUR COUNTRY NEEDS YOU !

Make yourselves liked again by having a look down the back of your sofas - NOW, before its too late.

mat777

10,387 posts

160 months

Friday 12th October 2012
quotequote all
miniman said:
Terrible shame, but inevitable I guess. If it was simply money required, one would hope that Branson or someone similar would pitch in.

I went down to Filton to see the fly past the other week, will definitely go to a couple of airshows in 2013.


XH558 by binaryimage, on Flickr
You were at Filton? So was I! (on the blue bike). Looked brilliant didnt it!

What I dont get is, what with all the millionaires and entrepreneurs etc, why they couldnt easily raise the £200k between them - to most, it would be pocket money each let alone as a collective donation. Or as someone else said, the Lotto. And there shirely must be some company somewhere than can rebuild jet engines, again for what would amount to pocket money for the lotto or a plutocrat

Skodaku

1,805 posts

219 months

Friday 12th October 2012
quotequote all
Of course, driving up or down the A15, (Lincs), past RAF Waddington you can see XM607 - the actual Falklands Vulcan. clap Considering she's the only Vulcan to have delivered a bomb in aggression, not much is made of her. Merely a shell now, I believe. I was told that quite a lot of her bits went to help restore 558 but no idea if that is the case or not.

The book Vulcan 607 by Roland White (?) is superb reading............as has been mentioned more than once before. read

aeropilot

34,526 posts

227 months

Friday 12th October 2012
quotequote all
mat777 said:
And there shirely must be some company somewhere than can rebuild jet engines
Only RR themselves had the facilities to zero-time Vulcan engines, and RR scrapped those facilities/tooling etc after the RAF stopped flying the Vulcan in the mid 1980's, the RAF retaining sufficient stocks of zero-timed engines for the projected remaining life of the then, Vulcan Display Flight.




thomablue

41 posts

154 months

Friday 12th October 2012
quotequote all
I suspect most on this thread have have seen one of these flying,but on the off chance you haven't...in 2013 make sure you do..........you're mouth will open and your jaw will drop.

heisthegaffer

3,384 posts

198 months

Friday 12th October 2012
quotequote all
ChrisP T5 said:
DiscoColin said:
Erm - they are. Battle of Britain memorial flight operates 12 aircraft at the taxpayers expense and while a charity, the Royal Navy historic flight is partially subsidised with the availability of some Navy resources/facilities. The thing that makes this possible is the public will to support the heritage of the second world war, whereas a hugely more expensive cold war aircraft designed to drop nuclear weapons on the Soviet Union is always going to be a tougher sell to the element of the public that would sooner see the money spent on mundane st that will have no historic relevance beyond the following week frown

This is actually one of those rare cases where you can't really pin it on the politicians - it is the public. If it was a vote winner then you can be your arse that any politician of any allegiance would find the money and make it happen. As things are, I reckon that the only person in politics who could spin such a thing without being hounded out of office would be (love him or hate him) Boris.
Unfortunately 'DiscoColin' is exactly correct.... though it should annoy any 'bloke' with any interest in anything mechanical (witness all the recent programs on BBC channels about UK engineering heritage)

Reason why it should be preserved - flying...is because the Vulcan design is pretty much unique (US B1 excepted)...and its British!. It is part of our engineering heritage..along with bloomin' stationary steam engines...locomotives...cars (eh? - on PH?..)and all the other stuff that gets preserved, so we should be proud of it!.

Unfortunately the only media coverage I've ever seen of it - was on an early evening programme, done by John Sargeant (I cant remember the one it was) - so yes the general public is completely ignorant of its demise or its greatness

I have contributed to the cause - and yes its entirely volunteer funded...no lottery...some small business funding (there was even an american firm that found an unused fuelling cart and donated it along the way...)

For impact on how huge/great/impressive a Vulcan is - I recommend the RAF museum at Hendon... we took our kids along years ago, you walk into one hall...with loads of small plane exhibits at eye level. They asked 'Why's it so dark..?' - just told them to look up.... most of the halls exhibits are fitted under the wings of a Vulcan (on its long stalk like landing gear)...the moment of silence,awe,and then appreciation of the size of the thing was priceless.
Agree with what you have said but the National Lottery donated circa £2.5m very early to allow her to get this far. Without them, it's unlikely she would ever have flown again. Like I say, I agree so please don't think I'm being a git.

Beautiful plane, seen her many times both pre and post resurrection. A true shame that the end is nigh and I'm dreading the last display as that really will be it, she'll never fly again (other than to a museum or whatever) but also I know I'll see my father in an emotional state I have never seen him in before.. he is totally in love with this plane.



ApexJimi

24,960 posts

243 months

Friday 12th October 2012
quotequote all
bow XH558 and all who made it possible for us to see her over the past few years

GtrMan

134 posts

149 months

Friday 12th October 2012
quotequote all
As a kid here in Malta I still remember this plane very good since we lived on the approuch of runway 24 which was very busy at that time with all types flying by at low alt... Lightning, Victor, Vulcan , Camberra, JAGUARS , bacanirs, nimrods, Shegiltons,phontoms .... I still remember the engine rorr!!

I also remember the Vulcan crash here in Malta in Zabbar .. I was still at school at those days ... still remember the smoke coming up from Zabbar were the Vulcan fell...

M- Malta.

dapprman

2,315 posts

267 months

Friday 12th October 2012
quotequote all
Having read accounts of the bombing raid on the Falklands, this one is probably in far better condition and more airworthy (some of the tales I read were a little scary), but I think most of us subconsciously knew that this was going to be a limited time project.

Shame they can't get a second one sorted out to be a standing exhibit at Duxford, would be great to see one of these close (in time) to the B52 there.

BTW anyone know if the Canberra is still flying ?