RE: Harrier GR3: You Know You Want To

RE: Harrier GR3: You Know You Want To

Wednesday 26th March 2014

Harrier GR3: You Know You Want To

It's got 30mm cannon pods for "that mean and purposeful look" in case you weren't already sold on the idea



Much of my life has been spent trundling up and down the A1; landmarks along this road are few and far between but one of them I always used to look out for was an English Electric Lightning slowly rotting in a scrapyard somewhere near Newark. Over the years it slowly disintegrated, parts being robbed from it, graffiti covering what panels remained and the steady process of decay seeing it reduced further every time I went past. I went past the other day and, finally, it seems the Lightning has gone the way of the roundabouts that used to punctuate the journey leaving just the OK Diners and inexplicable - and seemingly unique to the A1 - rise of the roadside sex shop. Filthy truckers.  

Where's the nav then?
Where's the nav then?
Anyway. This one may take some explaining if you decide to take a punt on it. But as an example of some of the weird and wonderful things that lurk in the furthest reaches of the PH classifieds we couldn't help expanding on our Tweet and giving this Harrier GR3 some homepage exposure. 

A few caveats. It's not a runner. Indeed, it hasn't flown since 1990. We're assuming those pods on its belly don't actually contain the 30mm Aden revolver cannons so the "mean and purposeful look" the vendor mentions is little more than that. It does come with its Rolls-Royce Pegasus engine but that's currently not fitted to the airframe. It does, however, have a display trolley to allow you to put it on show beside the plane. 

It does apparently have combat history though, its operational life including deployments in Belize and Germany but also active service in the Falklands conflict. It's claimed it represents a "serious investment opportunity" but we'd have to see about that. With or without the prospect of a financial return what the hell would you do with it? 

It needs bit of work, yes
It needs bit of work, yes
Well, you could put it on display beside a desolate and boring stretch of road like that old Lightning. There aren't many things that can make a journey down the A1 exciting but that old fighter jet used to achieve that in fine style. And if you can't fly the thing at least you can surprise and delight a few bored plane geeks. And, yes, I know there's another Harrier further south on the A1 outside the aircraft's home base of RAF Wittering. More the merrier though. 

 



Harrier GR3
Price:
 POA
Why you should: It's a jump jet!
Why you shouldn't: Its days of jumping are over; might take some explaining back home.

See the original advert here.

 

Author
Discussion

Jawaman

Original Poster:

271 posts

133 months

Wednesday 26th March 2014
quotequote all
If I won the lotto, there would be one of these in my garden without a doubt.

P-Jay

10,563 posts

191 months

Wednesday 26th March 2014
quotequote all
Purely hypothetically of course, but any Aero buffs care to comment on:

Cost and possibility of making it fly again.
How long and how much to train to fly it yourself.

And finally, are you even allow to fly these sort of things?? Imagine the fuss you could cause buzzing ships of the Russian Navy or over-shooting Israel!

P.S. I've got an uncle and a few friends who used to work at RAF St. Athan maintaining aircraft, I assume that would give me some sort of head-start if I could drag them out of retirement.

Edited by P-Jay on Wednesday 26th March 11:03

Oddball RS

1,757 posts

218 months

Wednesday 26th March 2014
quotequote all
P-Jay,

Its subsonic so maybe, its VERY complex and VERY demanding to learn to fly - so double no.

And look at the current scene, every organisation is struggling to secure funding. Vulcan, Sally B etc etc etc

Limpet

6,307 posts

161 months

Wednesday 26th March 2014
quotequote all
A turbine engine counts as forced induction, surely. wink

dukebox9reg

1,570 posts

148 months

Wednesday 26th March 2014
quotequote all
Worked on Apache helicopters for 12 years so not quite fast jet but still gas turbine engines etc.

Components are very very expensive 1 small screw will cost around £20 due to it being stringently tested for airworthiness regardless of it probably being the same screw you can get from B&Q for a couple of pence.

A blade sleeve (the bit that holds the rotor to the rotor head on the Apache) costs £24k

The aircraft would most likely need a complete strip down and most bits will most likely be corroded etc. The engine could be overhauled (also at some considerable expense) but its the airframe, controls,hydraulics and the very outdated electronics which would cost the most. Put it this way if you could afford it, it would be cheaper to buy yourself one that works.

I'd take a punt at at least 300-500k to get it moving around the ground with all the controls working, bit more to get it fully airworthy plus all your license fees etc.

To work on the aircraft aswell you also need to be licensed etc so you would most likely have to employ someone to repair it/maintain it. So 50k a year at least for their time plus the aircraft can only fly for so many flying hours before quite expensive maintenance is required etc etc.

I think its one of those times were if you have to ask how much it costs you cant afford it.

Jimbo.

3,947 posts

189 months

Wednesday 26th March 2014
quotequote all
P-Jay said:
Purely hypothetically of course, but any Aero buffs care to comment on:

Cost and possibility of making it fly again.
How long and how much to train to fly it yourself.

And finally, are you even allow to fly these sort of things?? Imagine the fuss you could cause buzzing ships of the Russian Navy or over-shooting Israel!

P.S. I've got an uncle and a few friends who used to work at RAF St. Athan maintaining aircraft, I assume that would give me some sort of head-start if I could drag them out of retirement.

Edited by P-Jay on Wednesday 26th March 11:03
Never.
Never.

The CAA simply wouldn't allow it.

rpla102

333 posts

221 months

Wednesday 26th March 2014
quotequote all
I wonder if Flt. Lt. J.Herod is a PH'er? Would be great to get some info from him on the aircraft.

A quick google suggests he went on to become an instructor...

http://www.ejection-history.org.uk/aircraft_by_typ...

If you search for his name he had a 'very hard' landing at Wittering in 1995!!

meemperor

35 posts

129 months

Wednesday 26th March 2014
quotequote all
A few Americans have fighter jets in private hands.

But Harriers have a reputation for being tricky to fly. You'd probably have to buy a sim as well.

996TT02

3,308 posts

140 months

Wednesday 26th March 2014
quotequote all
One of my less realistic fantasies has always been taking one of these to somewhere like the West End and "parking" it by letting it hover 10 ft off the ground outside where you are going... sad I know but hey fun all the same.

mike-r

1,539 posts

191 months

Wednesday 26th March 2014
quotequote all
Ventured below Sheffield not long ago as I got my passport renewed and noticed these A1 sex shops. Thought I imagined them! Two identical about five miles apart on opposite sides of the carriageway, just in case you missed the first. Bizarre.

iloveboost

1,531 posts

162 months

Wednesday 26th March 2014
quotequote all
If it doesn't fly it's like the worlds most expensive garden ornament.

P-Jay

10,563 posts

191 months

Wednesday 26th March 2014
quotequote all
Jimbo. said:
Never.
Never.

The CAA simply wouldn't allow it.
Frankly, if I was the one with the fully functional Harrier I'd be the one telling people who does what wink

Seems I'd have to stick to my original 'euro millions win day dream' and keep a L39 somewhere sunny in the US.

TIGERSIX

969 posts

231 months

Wednesday 26th March 2014
quotequote all
Jimbo. said:
P-Jay said:
Purely hypothetically of course, but any Aero buffs care to comment on:

Cost and possibility of making it fly again.
How long and how much to train to fly it yourself.

And finally, are you even allow to fly these sort of things?? Imagine the fuss you could cause buzzing ships of the Russian Navy or over-shooting Israel!

P.S. I've got an uncle and a few friends who used to work at RAF St. Athan maintaining aircraft, I assume that would give me some sort of head-start if I could drag them out of retirement.

Edited by P-Jay on Wednesday 26th March 11:03
Never.Never.

The CAA simply wouldn't allow it.
http://www.aaib.gov.uk/publications/bulletins/october_1993/hawker_hunter_t7__g_btyl.cfm
Sorry Jimbo
Oh yes you can mate of mine had a decommissioned Hawker Hunter in civi sadly he suffered a misdemeanor and planted it ,Wally Cubit was a top crop duster pilot in the 70's a carpenter by trade and a self taught aero engineer . His down fall was not wanting to disapoint the crowds at an airshow one day .

llamafarmer

2 posts

146 months

Wednesday 26th March 2014
quotequote all
Oh, and they lied about it seeing missions in Falklands:

BAe Harrier GR.3 XZ132

29.03.82 - A of 233 OCU Wittering, transferred to 1(F) Sqn during April.

Allocated fin code - Red 36. Outrigger codes - Yellow 36. ALE-40 chaff dispensers fitted.

04.05.82 - flown from Wittering to St Mawgan, from there on 05.05.82 to Banjul and on to Wideawake, Ascension on 06.05.82. Suffered from incurable fuel leaks; returned to Wittering, date unknown.

Source: http://archive.is/vEKoS#selection-1717.0-1769.72


Rotary Madness

2,285 posts

186 months

Wednesday 26th March 2014
quotequote all
P-Jay said:
Jimbo. said:
Never.
Never.

The CAA simply wouldn't allow it.
Frankly, if I was the one with the fully functional Harrier I'd be the one telling people who does what wink

Seems I'd have to stick to my original 'euro millions win day dream' and keep a L39 somewhere sunny in the US.
The CAA really are a big bunch of bores frown

HoHoHo

14,987 posts

250 months

Wednesday 26th March 2014
quotequote all
llamafarmer said:
Oh, and they lied about it seeing missions in Falklands:

BAe Harrier GR.3 XZ132

29.03.82 - A of 233 OCU Wittering, transferred to 1(F) Sqn during April.

Allocated fin code - Red 36. Outrigger codes - Yellow 36. ALE-40 chaff dispensers fitted.

04.05.82 - flown from Wittering to St Mawgan, from there on 05.05.82 to Banjul and on to Wideawake, Ascension on 06.05.82. Suffered from incurable fuel leaks; returned to Wittering, date unknown.

Source: http://archive.is/vEKoS#selection-1717.0-1769.72
How on earth can a jet suffer from 'incurable fuel leaks'?

Presumably there's a finite number of pipes and bolts that are either loose or need a tighten up?

smilo996

2,783 posts

170 months

Wednesday 26th March 2014
quotequote all
The perfect statement to make flying into Henley, Ascot, Knighsbridge.

Brilliant aircraft.

Eric Mc

121,958 posts

265 months

Wednesday 26th March 2014
quotequote all
There is only one flyable civilian owned Harrier in airworthy condition in the world - and that's in the US. The pilot is ex US Marine Corps and used to fly them for a living.

Back in the 1970s, Hawker Siddeley operated a couple of Harriers on the civil register. One of them, G-VTOL, is now on display at Brooklands.

Harriers are notoriously difficult aircraft to fly - especially the early generation versions like the GR3.

As for this one, I'll have to stick to 1/72 versions I'm afraid.

350Matt

3,736 posts

279 months

Wednesday 26th March 2014
quotequote all
this seems like a opportune moment to remind people of this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fGjizZCXetk



Countdown

39,824 posts

196 months

Wednesday 26th March 2014
quotequote all
350Matt said:
this seems like a opportune moment to remind people of this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fGjizZCXetk
Best advert. Ever. biggrin