Duration of take off. How long generally?
Discussion
As a fairly frequent flyer (c.20 return flights p.a.) I have noticed over the past 12 months or so that the takeoff roll is often much longer than it used to be; certainly enough of a difference for me to notice. This is mostly all on smaller aircraft (A319/A320 types) and within Europe. Curious as to whether anything has changed to drive this?
r1flyguy1 said:
And way to technical for people who have little aviation technical background/knowledge.
Just to correct 1 point she makes....
V1 is not a decision speed,.......
For all intents & purpose, if you reach V1 there is no decision to be made you only have 1 option & to me, that's NOT a Decision
That's fair enough but we are splitting hairs. Just to correct 1 point she makes....
V1 is not a decision speed,.......
For all intents & purpose, if you reach V1 there is no decision to be made you only have 1 option & to me, that's NOT a Decision
Below V1, loose a donk and you stop. Above V1, loose a donk and you go.
Ergo V1 is a decision speed (Note: the decision has already been made whether to stop or go).
MattS3 said:
Some really informative replies here, thanks folks.
I think I'm right in thinking that if things are not going to plan by a certain time, the plane can still be brought to a safe stop so long as the wheels are still on the ground then......
Thus, my fear of running out of runway is not one to be awfully concerned about as the decision to abort will be taken prior to the wheels leaving the black stuff.
However, once off the ground, if there is an issue, even at 5 feet, the outcome could be much different.....
As long as you're not flying with this guy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmEVwyMRYIYI think I'm right in thinking that if things are not going to plan by a certain time, the plane can still be brought to a safe stop so long as the wheels are still on the ground then......
Thus, my fear of running out of runway is not one to be awfully concerned about as the decision to abort will be taken prior to the wheels leaving the black stuff.
However, once off the ground, if there is an issue, even at 5 feet, the outcome could be much different.....
I have to say that seeing that Thompson birdstrike video some time ago made me much happier about takeoffs!
CrutyRammers said:
MattS3 said:
Some really informative replies here, thanks folks.
I think I'm right in thinking that if things are not going to plan by a certain time, the plane can still be brought to a safe stop so long as the wheels are still on the ground then......
Thus, my fear of running out of runway is not one to be awfully concerned about as the decision to abort will be taken prior to the wheels leaving the black stuff.
However, once off the ground, if there is an issue, even at 5 feet, the outcome could be much different.....
As long as you're not flying with this guy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmEVwyMRYIYI think I'm right in thinking that if things are not going to plan by a certain time, the plane can still be brought to a safe stop so long as the wheels are still on the ground then......
Thus, my fear of running out of runway is not one to be awfully concerned about as the decision to abort will be taken prior to the wheels leaving the black stuff.
However, once off the ground, if there is an issue, even at 5 feet, the outcome could be much different.....
I have to say that seeing that Thompson birdstrike video some time ago made me much happier about takeoffs!
Ginetta G15 Girl said:
r1flyguy1 said:
And way to technical for people who have little aviation technical background/knowledge.
Just to correct 1 point she makes....
V1 is not a decision speed,.......
For all intents & purpose, if you reach V1 there is no decision to be made you only have 1 option & to me, that's NOT a Decision
That's fair enough but we are splitting hairs. Just to correct 1 point she makes....
V1 is not a decision speed,.......
For all intents & purpose, if you reach V1 there is no decision to be made you only have 1 option & to me, that's NOT a Decision
Below V1, loose a donk and you stop. Above V1, loose a donk and you go.
Ergo V1 is a decision speed (Note: the decision has already been made whether to stop or go).
This guy could have done with a bit more strip or a bit less load!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9DFUqbdH_0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9DFUqbdH_0
r1flyguy1 said:
Ginetta G15 Girl said:
r1flyguy1 said:
And way to technical for people who have little aviation technical background/knowledge.
Just to correct 1 point she makes....
V1 is not a decision speed,.......
For all intents & purpose, if you reach V1 there is no decision to be made you only have 1 option & to me, that's NOT a Decision
That's fair enough but we are splitting hairs. Just to correct 1 point she makes....
V1 is not a decision speed,.......
For all intents & purpose, if you reach V1 there is no decision to be made you only have 1 option & to me, that's NOT a Decision
Below V1, loose a donk and you stop. Above V1, loose a donk and you go.
Ergo V1 is a decision speed (Note: the decision has already been made whether to stop or go).
But none of this answers the OPs question. Which has a lot more to do with runway length, atmospheric factors and obstacle clearance. This leads to the choice of V1/VR/V2, and the thrust to be used. Which in turn dictates the take off run of the aircraft.
jonnyb said:
r1flyguy1 said:
Ginetta G15 Girl said:
r1flyguy1 said:
And way to technical for people who have little aviation technical background/knowledge.
Just to correct 1 point she makes....
V1 is not a decision speed,.......
For all intents & purpose, if you reach V1 there is no decision to be made you only have 1 option & to me, that's NOT a Decision
That's fair enough but we are splitting hairs. Just to correct 1 point she makes....
V1 is not a decision speed,.......
For all intents & purpose, if you reach V1 there is no decision to be made you only have 1 option & to me, that's NOT a Decision
Below V1, loose a donk and you stop. Above V1, loose a donk and you go.
Ergo V1 is a decision speed (Note: the decision has already been made whether to stop or go).
But none of this answers the OPs question. Which has a lot more to do with runway length, atmospheric factors and obstacle clearance. This leads to the choice of V1/VR/V2, and the thrust to be used. Which in turn dictates the take off run of the aircraft.
Terrain around can make for a longer run. Lisbon and Madrid are good examples. Long runways with hills about have seen me doing 185mph down a runway to get some extra 'throw' into the air and improved climb performance.
Lisbon is bloody awful at that speed, I do wonder how much abuse those tyres can take.
Lisbon is bloody awful at that speed, I do wonder how much abuse those tyres can take.
Mojocvh said:
Getting back to the OP!
They use rated takeoffs where the engines are set to a performance "stop" calculated from "loads of stuff" mainly to get the maximum use of the engines before they have to go for overhaul..
They do indeed.... But not always...They use rated takeoffs where the engines are set to a performance "stop" calculated from "loads of stuff" mainly to get the maximum use of the engines before they have to go for overhaul..
Certain weather conditions prohibits the use of derate thrust thus full power is used.
I got on a 747 going on a non stop from Joburg to Amsterdam. Again, every seat full, a hold full of carved wooden animals, hot afternoon and Joburg is at a decent altitude. I really thought the pilot was going to drive the plane back at full pelt, rather than attempt to get it airbourne.
Gassing Station | Boats, Planes & Trains | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff