Bear in the air

Author
Discussion

Simpo Two

Original Poster:

85,526 posts

266 months

Thursday 19th February 2015
quotequote all
Yes, it was a rhetorical question really. Putin wants to rebuild the USSR and short of starting WW3 there's damn all we can do about it except throw paper.

But I'd rather Putin gets the Baltic states than WW3.

It's slightly reminiscent of Mr Hitler's probing takeovers of the 1930s, but I don't think Putin has any designs beyond what was the old USSR.

It's funny; we seem terrified of a Cold War - yet it was 'normal' for decades - I grew up in it - and seemed to work quite well.

philmots

4,631 posts

261 months

Thursday 19th February 2015
quotequote all
So what would of happened if their planes came into our actual airspace?

Would they get shot straight down?

Would the st really hit the fan then?

guru_1071

2,768 posts

235 months

Thursday 19th February 2015
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
With a Bear service ceiling of 45,000 feet I'm afraid your Spits won't be able to the intercept.
pfffffff


nothing a Eurofighter and a stout towrope wouldn't sort out



ecsrobin

17,134 posts

166 months

Thursday 19th February 2015
quotequote all
guru_1071 said:
Simpo Two said:
With a Bear service ceiling of 45,000 feet I'm afraid your Spits won't be able to the intercept.
pfffffff


nothing a Eurofighter and a stout towrope wouldn't sort out
A griffon powered spit could get to 43,500 feet so as long as the bear isn't operating at maximum then the spit has a chance (although in the real world the pressurised cockpits are no longer operational on the BBMF aircraft)

dr_gn

16,168 posts

185 months

Thursday 19th February 2015
quotequote all
ecsrobin said:
guru_1071 said:
Simpo Two said:
With a Bear service ceiling of 45,000 feet I'm afraid your Spits won't be able to the intercept.
pfffffff


nothing a Eurofighter and a stout towrope wouldn't sort out
A griffon powered spit could get to 43,500 feet so as long as the bear isn't operating at maximum then the spit has a chance (although in the real world the pressurised cockpits are no longer operational on the BBMF aircraft)
What about the 100+ mph difference in top speed?

Simpo Two

Original Poster:

85,526 posts

266 months

Thursday 19th February 2015
quotequote all
dr_gn said:
ecsrobin said:
A griffon powered spit could get to 43,500 feet so as long as the bear isn't operating at maximum then the spit has a chance (although in the real world the pressurised cockpits are no longer operational on the BBMF aircraft)
What about the 100+ mph difference in top speed?
Hmm. Frontal attack from 1500 feet below, hope your shells make the distance - massive deflection so basically impossible - stall from the recoil, then land back at base and claim 1x Frightened.

But assuming you could formate alongside a Bear with a Spitfire it would be a good chuckle for both sides. They might even report back that the RAF is down to its last half dozen Spitfires...

ecsrobin

17,134 posts

166 months

Thursday 19th February 2015
quotequote all
dr_gn said:
What about the 100+ mph difference in top speed?
The Russians probably can't afford the fuel at top speed so will be plodding along......

Lost soul

8,712 posts

183 months

Thursday 19th February 2015
quotequote all
ecsrobin said:
The Russians probably can't afford the fuel at top speed so will be plodding along......
they have as much fuel as they want to burn

aeropilot

34,670 posts

228 months

Thursday 19th February 2015
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
It's slightly reminiscent of Mr Hitler's probing takeovers of the 1930s, but I don't think Putin has any designs beyond what was the old USSR.
Indeed.........and funnily enough, most late 30's politicians didn't want to think Hitler had any designs beyond reclaiming Prussia, and the German speaking Sudentenland regions.

Except, he wanted to avenge the Versailles Treaty so, once we (Europe collectively) didn't do anything to stop the first phase, he felt we(collective) equally wouldn't do anything if he went further.

Putin could easily take the same view - we really don't know what his intensions are tbh.

CharlieCrocodile

1,197 posts

154 months

Thursday 19th February 2015
quotequote all

scrwright

2,626 posts

191 months

Thursday 19th February 2015
quotequote all
The french having a nosey too!

DeuxCentCinq

14,180 posts

183 months

Thursday 19th February 2015
quotequote all
CharlieCrocodile said:
Show them the armaments!

hidetheelephants

24,463 posts

194 months

Thursday 19th February 2015
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
But I'd rather Putin gets the Baltic states than WW3.

It's slightly reminiscent of Mr Hitler's probing takeovers of the 1930s, but I don't think Putin has any designs beyond what was the old USSR.
Are your middle names Quisling and Chamberlain? Those are NATO members you're wishing away there.
aeropilot said:
Simpo Two said:
NB If Ukraine works, then no doubt Putin will try the same on the Baltic states. I wonder what we will do?
Nothing.........and he's knows it, which is why he's doing what he's doing.

Putin is no fool and he's sat back and waited for enough fools to take up political office in western govts before doing what he's now doing.
Our NATO obligations are as firm as they were in 1949; if he starts messing with the baltic states he's going get his nose put even more out of joint than it already is.

Edited by hidetheelephants on Thursday 19th February 18:20

Esseesse

8,969 posts

209 months

Thursday 19th February 2015
quotequote all
Surely, especially seeing at they're quite old, there's some chance of a Russian Bear running into trouble on one of it's excursions and having to land/crash?

ecsrobin

17,134 posts

166 months

Thursday 19th February 2015
quotequote all
CharlieCrocodile said:
Inteligence gathering of the intercept - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TnZMy1WWjZs
Edited for you.

Yertis

18,061 posts

267 months

Thursday 19th February 2015
quotequote all
ecsrobin said:
Edited for you.
Some of the comments in there make me despair...

h8tax

440 posts

144 months

Thursday 19th February 2015
quotequote all
DeuxCentCinq said:
CharlieCrocodile said:
Show them the armaments!
How come what I take to be the French plane (although hard to make out) seems to have a lot more missiles than ours? Are we that skint?

Simpo Two

Original Poster:

85,526 posts

266 months

Thursday 19th February 2015
quotequote all
hidetheelephants said:
Simpo Two said:
But I'd rather Putin gets the Baltic states than WW3. It's slightly reminiscent of Mr Hitler's probing takeovers of the 1930s, but I don't think Putin has any designs beyond what was the old USSR.
Are your middle names Quisling and Chamberlain? Those are NATO members you're wishing away there.
Quisling was a Norwegian Nazi sympathiser/traitor; Chamberlain is now known as an appeaser but what he was trying to do was avoid war. I'm a cynical pragmatist.

hidetheelephants said:
Our NATO obligations are as firm as they were in 1949; if he starts messing with the baltic states he's going get his nose put even more out of joint than it already is.
And how do you intend to do that? Sanctions? It's the fact that Russia has NATO neighbours now that provoked Putin in the first place. The Baltic state's membership of NATO is rather like Greece's membership of the Euro I think - one too many on the raft.

Edited by Simpo Two on Thursday 19th February 19:33

Yertis

18,061 posts

267 months

Thursday 19th February 2015
quotequote all
There was quiet an interesting ting about this on R4 a few minutes ago. Difference between Ukraine and the Baltics is that the latter are already part of the EU and want to stay that way, even the ethnic russians therein. In Ukraine he's 'pushing on an open door', in the Baltics that won't be the case. Hopefully.

ecsrobin

17,134 posts

166 months

Thursday 19th February 2015
quotequote all
h8tax said:
How come what I take to be the French plane (although hard to make out) seems to have a lot more missiles than ours? Are we that skint?
The typhoon has 4 AIM-132 ASRAAM and 4 AIM-120 AMRAAM missiles.