Bear in the air

Author
Discussion

Simpo Two

Original Poster:

85,399 posts

265 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
1970s here we go again... tally ho... http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/01/29/uk-brita...

SHutchinson

2,040 posts

184 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
They must have been pretty well observed by a lot of Northern European air traffic monitoring before suddenly appearing above the channel. Unless they'd flown down over the North Sea unobserved.

TheEnd

15,370 posts

188 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
Russian plane in international airspace.

Standard operating procedure. I wonder if there is as much tabaloid coverage in Russia when the UK and US do the same.


b14

1,061 posts

188 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
TheEnd said:
Russian plane in international airspace.

Standard operating procedure. I wonder if there is as much tabaloid coverage in Russia when the UK and US do the same.
Let's fix that:

Russian surveillance plane in a narrow corridor of international airspace, for no discernable legitimate reason other than sabre rattling.

Standard Russian operating procedure. I wonder if there is as much tabaloid [sic] coverage in Russia when the UK and US don't do the same.

Fittster

20,120 posts

213 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
b14 said:
TheEnd said:
Russian plane in international airspace.

Standard operating procedure. I wonder if there is as much tabaloid coverage in Russia when the UK and US do the same.
Let's fix that:

Russian surveillance plane in a narrow corridor of international airspace, for no discernable legitimate reason other than sabre rattling.

Standard Russian operating procedure. I wonder if there is as much tabaloid [sic] coverage in Russia when the UK and US don't do the same.
Really?

http://rt.com/news/177720-us-spy-plane-sweden/

Dr Jekyll

23,820 posts

261 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
TheEnd said:
Russian plane in international airspace.

Standard operating procedure. I wonder if there is as much tabaloid coverage in Russia when the UK and US do the same.
There is very rarely any tabloid coverage when Russian aircraft enter the UK air defence region. What is different in this case is that civilian flights were potentially disrupted.

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
If it's tabloid coverage I'm surprised it didn't say "Ruskie jet bomber plot foiled by Army Typhoons in daring dogfight over Channel"........and then show a photo of a USMC AV8-b.

FourWheelDrift

88,504 posts

284 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
Crossflow Kid said:
If it's tabloid coverage I'm surprised it didn't say "Ruskie jet bomber plot foiled by Army Typhoons in daring dogfight over Channel"........and then show a photo of a USMC AV8-b.
Have you been watching Russia Today again?

guru_1071

2,768 posts

234 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
they should just scramble the Battle of Britain spitfires to intercept them

and take a photo of it

superkartracer

8,959 posts

222 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
b14 said:
TheEnd said:
Russian plane in international airspace.

Standard operating procedure. I wonder if there is as much tabaloid coverage in Russia when the UK and US do the same.
Let's fix that:

Russian surveillance plane in a narrow corridor of international airspace, for no discernable legitimate reason other than sabre rattling.

Standard Russian operating procedure. I wonder if there is as much tabaloid [sic] coverage in Russia when the UK and US don't do the same.
Lets add a little extra for you -

http://news.sky.com/story/1417501/uk-summons-ambas...

Forcing civilian aircraft to be diverted..

Keeping in mind, these *old* machines can carry enough nuclear cruise missiles to wipe most of the UK out.

Simpo Two

Original Poster:

85,399 posts

265 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
It says something of our air defence capability that a fighter from Lossiemouth was scrambled to intercept an aircraft over the English Channel.

FourWheelDrift

88,504 posts

284 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
It says something of our air defence capability that a fighter from Lossiemouth was scrambled to intercept an aircraft over the English Channel.
Coningsby and Lossimouth on an intercept course when they flew too close to UK airspace south of Portsmouth. Then the Bears flew their usual route west around Ireland and around the top of Scotland. Probably why Lossiemouth was scrambled, so they could follow them north?

mebe

292 posts

143 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
Says diddly squat unless you can compare the time for a Typhoon on full chat from Lossie to the channel (not long) compared to the warning time the had and the perimeter in force.

Simpo Two

Original Poster:

85,399 posts

265 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
The closer it is the sooner it gets there. How long does it take Ivan to press the button?

skeggysteve

5,724 posts

217 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
I just read the BBC report about this.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-31049952

How quick could our planes get to the Russian plane from their bases?

Why didn't the Russians file a flight plan, just to wind us up or something else?

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
What could possibly go wrong if we just go and shoot it down and say "feck em" biggrin

Simpo Two

Original Poster:

85,399 posts

265 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
skeggysteve said:
Why didn't the Russians file a flight plan, just to wind us up or something else?
Because it's a spy plane? Callsign 'Spy 1'. 'Spy 1 requesting permission to overfly militarily sensitive areas, over'

They do it because they can.

Wacky Racer

38,154 posts

247 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
One of these days these "games" are going to end in tears.....

Anyone know of a good supplier for Anderson shelters?

aeropilot

34,567 posts

227 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
FourWheelDrift said:
Simpo Two said:
It says something of our air defence capability that a fighter from Lossiemouth was scrambled to intercept an aircraft over the English Channel.
Coningsby and Lossimouth on an intercept course when they flew too close to UK airspace south of Portsmouth. Then the Bears flew their usual route west around Ireland and around the top of Scotland. Probably why Lossiemouth was scrambled, so they could follow them north?
Bears had flown down west of Ireland and east up the channel almost as far as Eastborne allegedly, before doing a 180 and returning using the same route in reverse.

Of course with only 2 fighter stations left in the UK now the Ruskie's are having lots of fun giving us the right all run around....... rolleyes


skeggysteve

5,724 posts

217 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Because it's a spy plane?
So what your saying is that I asked a dumb question?
With hindsight I think you're right! getmecoat