What did I see? big yellow train

What did I see? big yellow train

Author
Discussion

HaroldBishop

652 posts

177 months

Friday 20th February 2015
quotequote all
Tonsko said:
I saw that NMT at Wolves once while sat there waiting for mine. The diesel locomotive (one with the squashed nose like a bulldog) made such an incredible noise pulling out!
That would have been a class 37 - fantastic engines:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detai...

I live on the line to Sellafield so they come through here every day with the flasks. The speed limit increases just before the station when travelling south so they are always on full chat and can be heard all over the town...


Also a good video here that shows the length of that ballast train.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MvTZMBR28z8

Rick101

6,969 posts

150 months

Friday 20th February 2015
quotequote all
NMT runs with Class 43 power cars.

43013, 43014, 43062. All maintained by East Coast.


Tonsko

6,299 posts

215 months

Friday 20th February 2015
quotequote all
Rick101 said:
NMT runs with Class 43 power cars.

43013, 43014, 43062. All maintained by East Coast.
It looked like the 'Class 37' mentioned above. Maybe the '43' was broken? The yellow carriages that followed it had desks on one side with computer monitors, and what looked like a meeting room at one end. They might have been doing something else though - I'm really only guessing that it was the NMT smile

Edited by Tonsko on Friday 20th February 10:05

P5Nij

675 posts

172 months

Friday 20th February 2015
quotequote all
tight5 said:
HOBC.
High Output Ballast Cleaner .
Regularly work this and the shorter 'TRT' version, very heavy and takes some shifting at around 3,300tons all up. Getting it up to the 60mph maximum needs a good old shove from the rear end driver, especially climbing out of Northampton. The first time I worked it I had to relieve the front end driver at Bedford Station while my mate waited on the platform to relieve the rear end man, it took eight minutes to get the rear end in the platform so he could get on! Once on the move though it doesn't feel that heavy to drive, until you need to make your first brake application on sighting adverse signals.



Edited by P5Nij on Friday 20th February 13:51

legzr1

3,848 posts

139 months

Friday 20th February 2015
quotequote all
As Tight5 will probably confirm we always drove these with just the one loco - the rear loco would be manned and running but isolated and providing no additional traction.

Personally I hated working them - the trains themselves were no bother, it was the in-fighting and bickering of the staff once you got to the site - as mentioned before, too many vested interests and too many cooks making the lives of drivers and signallers needlessly awkward.

HaroldBishop

652 posts

177 months

Friday 20th February 2015
quotequote all
Tonsko said:
It looked like the 'Class 37' mentioned above. Maybe the '43' was broken? The yellow carriages that followed it had desks on one side with computer monitors, and what looked like a meeting room at one end. They might have been doing something else though - I'm really only guessing that it was the NMT smile

Edited by Tonsko on Friday 20th February 10:05
The 'New Measurement Train' itself is the Class 43s (or Intercity 125 if you prefer):



However there are several other Network Rail measuring/surveying trains such as this one which will be what you saw:




Tonsko

6,299 posts

215 months

Friday 20th February 2015
quotequote all
The latter seems to be the one. It appears that I was guessing smile

Thanks. Nice pics by the way.

tight5

2,747 posts

159 months

Friday 20th February 2015
quotequote all
legzr1 said:
As Tight5 will probably confirm we always drove these with just the one loco - the rear loco would be manned and running but isolated and providing no additional traction.
Erm, yes, provisionally.
If the front driver didn't need any help from the back, he wouldn't ask for any.
BUT some of the places I've worked the HOBC to/from, you did NEED both locos at full tilt !

legzr1 said:
Personally I hated working them - the trains themselves were no bother, it was the in-fighting and bickering of the staff once you got to the site - as mentioned before, too many vested interests and too many cooks making the lives of drivers and signallers needlessly awkward.
Yeah, trains and ES (engineering supervisor) were no bother.
But the worksites.......
rolleyes



HaroldBishop said:
class 37 - fantastic engines:
I can't agree there.
I HATED working those locos.
Slow, loud, uncomfortable, cold, crap view.
nono

MGJohn

10,203 posts

183 months

Friday 20th February 2015
quotequote all
HaroldBishop said:
However there are several other Network Rail measuring/surveying trains such as this one which will be what you saw:

I'm old enough to remember when these magnificent Class 37s Diesel Locomotives were called English Electric Type 3s.... Commuting up to Liverpool Street and Kings Cross Stations in 1960 and later, these were brand new ex-works machines and used on station pilot and other light duties until ready to enter service. In BR corporate green, white and silver, they always looked and sounded magnificent. A nice before and after day at the office experience for the then eighteen year old transport enthusiast setting out on a career in the city. The trains I regularly commuted in were steam hauled by 0-6-2 Tanks which shuttled back and forth on those sub-urban services in north and east London. Other steam locomotives had nameplates on them like Tottenham Hotspur and Manchester United and Arsenal but, the old memory aint what it was. Another had Oliver Cromwell which I later saw at speed outbound with an express to East Anglia whilst I waited on Stratford Station for my local train.

Great days gorn forever.

W124Bob

1,745 posts

175 months

Friday 20th February 2015
quotequote all
NR also run a smaller a measurement train usually 3 coaches and 1 loco with the trailing coach working in pushpull mode(ex Scotrail Mk2 driving trailer) I think this a structure gauging train,it was tucked away at Longsight(Manchester)one night this week with a class31. NR have recently converted a handful of ex West Coast driving van trailers, extra lights and forward facing cameras were some of the obvious mods. In total I've seen as many as 3 NR trains in the same day, BR led the world for research until privatisation came along.

Rick101

6,969 posts

150 months

Friday 20th February 2015
quotequote all
Likely Ultrasonics and the rear you are thinking of are the DVT's.

RB Will

9,664 posts

240 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
tight5 said:
Can anyone explain what is going on with the 3 rails on the right? do they share the central rail? if so what is the point there as trains cant pass.

legzr1

3,848 posts

139 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
tight5 said:
I can't agree there.
I HATED working those locos.
Slow, loud, uncomfortable, cold, crap view.
nono
I don't think they were that good!

wink

tight5 said:
If the front driver didn't need any help from the back, he wouldn't ask for any.
BUT some of the places I've worked the HOBC to/from, you did NEED both locos at full tilt !
Fair enough, out of Birtley Jcn was the steepest place I ever worked it lol.

RB Will

9,664 posts

240 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
ah well spotted, thanks. Time for me to go buy some new eyes.

Leptons

5,113 posts

176 months

Wednesday 25th February 2015
quotequote all
Why on earth does the ballast need cleaning?

Rick101

6,969 posts

150 months

Wednesday 25th February 2015
quotequote all
After time it starts to wear and break down. Then you have drainage issues, voiding etc. Poor quality ballast will allow for movement in the lines which results in speed restrictions and if not rectified, eventually derailments.

Look at it like resurfacing.

Leptons

5,113 posts

176 months

Wednesday 25th February 2015
quotequote all
What's the reason they don't just tip some concrete on it then. Surely it would never need touching then? Why have lose ballast?

MGJohn

10,203 posts

183 months

Wednesday 25th February 2015
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Look how our roads break up merely being pounded by rubber. It used to be called the permanent way. Not now, if there was better way to maintain tracks it would have been introduced world wide long ago.

Rick101

6,969 posts

150 months

Thursday 26th February 2015
quotequote all
There are concrete sections in places. Where it suits is a good solution. Far higher installation cost and greatly increased risk of flooding but more stability and lower maintenance .

Don't know that much about it but think it's called slab track. Seem to recall it bring installed in a few tunnel renewals.

lufbramatt

Original Poster:

5,345 posts

134 months

Thursday 26th February 2015
quotequote all
I have noticed big sections of concrete based track on the HS1 line between Ebbsfleet and St. Pancras.