Battle of Britain Typhoon

Author
Discussion

Dr Jekyll

23,820 posts

261 months

Friday 17th April 2015
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Me too...!

But if a certain pattern of camouflage matched the ground in 1940, why doesn't it now? Perhaps we should paint them all with little housing estates on...
Reasonable question actually. Fighters have been multiple shades of grey for years presumably because they are expected to operate at altitude, but ground attack RAF aircraft were painted in green and grey camouflage until very recently.


Eric Mc

122,032 posts

265 months

Friday 17th April 2015
quotequote all
In fact, the camouflage scheme used between 1938 and 1942 was found NOT to be that good. The "Earth" and "Dark Green" upper camouflage scheme was not that effective, especially for aircraft fighting along the coast and the Channel areas.

That's why the fighter scheme was changed to grey and green in 1942. Night bombers retained the earth and green scheme as their upper camouflage was most effective when they were sitting at their bases. They were flying at night so the upper camouflage didn't matter so much on an actual operation.

Ginetta G15 Girl

3,220 posts

184 months

Friday 17th April 2015
quotequote all
Dr Jekyll said:
Reasonable question actually. Fighters have been multiple shades of grey for years presumably because they are expected to operate at altitude, but ground attack RAF aircraft were painted in green and grey camouflage until very recently.
The greys schemes started in the late 1970's with the USN 'Ferris Scheme' experiments. The RAF started in the very late 1970s/early 1980s with the work done by Mr Barley at Farnborough (who gives his name to the 'Barley Grey' [later known as 'Camouflage Grey']).

The differing greys used were to 'even out' the airframe such that the overall reflectivity matched that of the atmosphere at medium to high level; the 3 tone scheme on the RAF F4s worked particularly well owing to its 'bent wing' nature, but when applied to the Lightning worked less well (and had to be altered) owing to the Lightning's 'slab wing'.

The ground attack a/c (Jaguar, Harrier, Tornado GR) went into the grey schemes with the change in operating parameter from low level to medium level.

A trial was done on Albert with some a/c going grey but this was useless for Tac Ops so was dropped in favour over the later greeny-brown colour.


Interestingly the 'Hemp' schee originally developed for Nimrod, and later applied to the Victors and Funbuses, to help hide them when parked on large concrete dispersals worked particularly well in terms of matching the reflectivity of the upper air. It was less effective at low level over the sea and was dropped for another grey scheme.

Dr Jekyll

23,820 posts

261 months

Friday 17th April 2015
quotequote all
What was the reasoning behind the green/grey camouflage schemes briefly carried by Lightnings in the early 70s?

aeropilot

34,603 posts

227 months

Friday 17th April 2015
quotequote all
Dr Jekyll said:
What was the reasoning behind the green/grey camouflage schemes briefly carried by Lightnings in the early 70s?
It was more a case of bringing the Lightning fleet up to the standard grey/green scheme that the rest of the RAF fleet had already adopted by the late 1960's, as the emphasis become low level ops over high altitude ops (which is why the Lightnings had remained in natural finish until the mid 70's)
It was expected that the Lightning was going to be out of service by the mid/late 70's and so hadn't been painted, only the RAFG F.2A fleet being painted o/a green for overland low level ops. But, with the Lightning fleet soldering on past then, the UK fleet were progressively painted as the a/c when through MU's etc.

Eric Mc

122,032 posts

265 months

Friday 17th April 2015
quotequote all
RAF tactical aircraft were painted with grey/green upper camouflage colours all through the 1950s and into the 1960s. This scheme usually was in gloss or semi-gloss with aluminium painted undersides. You would see these colours on certain Meteors, Vampires, Venoms, Hunters, Javelins and Swifts. In the 60s, the aluminium undersides were replaced by light grey.

In the 1970s, the grey green and light grey changed top matt and the RAF markings had their white elements removed.

Mojocvh

16,837 posts

262 months

Saturday 18th April 2015
quotequote all
el stovey said:


Looks great!

http://www.clavework-graphics.co.uk/aircraft/fanta...

He's got some amazing schemes in there. hehe
looks awfully Mig 29 in those colours and angle.

Still a targets a target hehe

Boatbuoy

1,941 posts

162 months

Wednesday 22nd April 2015
quotequote all
Anyway, coming back on thread...



More pics & words here:

http://www.globalaviationresource.com/v2/2015/04/2...

ecsrobin

17,119 posts

165 months

Wednesday 22nd April 2015
quotequote all
Looks amazing. Interesting that they haven't painted the nose. I'm guessing it must affect the radar?

Boatbuoy

1,941 posts

162 months

Wednesday 22nd April 2015
quotequote all
ecsrobin said:
Looks amazing. Interesting that they haven't painted the nose. I'm guessing it must affect the radar?
And the other 'sensitive' bits (the cones on the wingtip pods, top of the fin).

Simpo Two

85,424 posts

265 months

Wednesday 22nd April 2015
quotequote all
Or heat?

Hooli

32,278 posts

200 months

Thursday 23rd April 2015
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Dr Jekyll said:
Ha, the Red Baron 100 years on.
It does look damn cool thumbup