Now that the Vulcan time is over

Now that the Vulcan time is over

Author
Discussion

Scuffers

20,887 posts

274 months

Tuesday 1st September 2015
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
It's just something that hasn't really been an issue in aviation. I've never seen any discussion or debate on the topic in any of the historic aviation magazines - such as "Aeroplane Monthly" or "Flypast".

I contend it matter not a jot.
Eric,

it may not to those you describe, however, when used by the mainstream media to the great unwashed, it has a whole different meaning.

Eric Mc

122,031 posts

265 months

Tuesday 1st September 2015
quotequote all
I bet the mainstream don't know the tight definitions applied to historic cars either - so they won't be particularly confused.
Indeed, a "vintage" wine could be less than a year old.

In general meaning "vintage" is usually taken as "old" - which would be applicable to a restored 55 year old aeroplane, in my opinion.

Kitchski

6,515 posts

231 months

Tuesday 1st September 2015
quotequote all
Well this thread has exhausted my entertainment pass for the day, that's for sure! What a good laugh, full of smiles. I'm going to try the gardening and cycling ones after I've had a sit down.

Riley Blue

20,955 posts

226 months

Tuesday 1st September 2015
quotequote all
I was thinking the same; the 'hero to zero' descent of interesting topics gets steeper and faster these days frown

Eric Mc

122,031 posts

265 months

Tuesday 1st September 2015
quotequote all
It became a "vintage" thread.

We do have a thread specifically for XH558 discussion?

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...

maffski

1,868 posts

159 months

Tuesday 1st September 2015
quotequote all
richw_82 said:
With regard to other return to flight projects not in progress such as VC-10, the factors involved in their flying again are the same one that Vulcan faces now. Spares and support, in particular that of the manufacturer
Given 3d scanning / printing / cam shouldn't spares at least start to get a bit easier?

RizzoTheRat

25,165 posts

192 months

Tuesday 1st September 2015
quotequote all
maffski said:
Given 3d scanning / printing / cam shouldn't spares at least start to get a bit easier?
Yes and no. It can make producing some complex parts easier, albeit expensive, however 3D printed materials tend to be weaker than cast/milled. As an example (although it's not the case for the Vulcan's Olympus engines) some jet engines have turbine blades made form a single crystal, to give a strength that 3D printing could never hope to attain. On the Olympus using pretty advanced forging techniques something like 50% of blades they manufactured weren't good enough to make it in to the engine, they need to be absolutely perfect as they operate in a gas stream which is higher than the melting temperature of the metal they're made of. And that's only one component of a very complex system.

Eric Mc

122,031 posts

265 months

Tuesday 1st September 2015
quotequote all
And would be to no avail whatsoever. Without the formal industry support - just like Concorde - no Vulcans will be taking to the air again, at least not in the UK.

droopsnoot

11,935 posts

242 months

Tuesday 1st September 2015
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
I contend it matters not a jot.
You're probably right - I think the term jars with me because I'm more into older cars and have only a passing interest in aircraft.

Anyway, sorry if my bringing it back up derailed the thread.

Lefty

16,154 posts

202 months

Tuesday 1st September 2015
quotequote all
I want to see a Lightning fly. Fat chance frown


Eric Mc

122,031 posts

265 months

Tuesday 1st September 2015
quotequote all
droopsnoot said:
Eric Mc said:
I contend it matters not a jot.
You're probably right - I think the term jars with me because I'm more into older cars and have only a passing interest in aircraft.

Anyway, sorry if my bringing it back up derailed the thread.
I have a music channel on my TV called "Vintage TV". It doesn't play any music pre 1960.

srob

11,609 posts

238 months

Tuesday 1st September 2015
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
I have a music channel on my TV called "Vintage TV". It doesn't play any music pre 1960.
I have one called Gold. It has all sorts of colours on it!

I think it jars me as I've been brought up with vintage (ie pre-31) motorbikes and get excited when I hear about 'vintage' bikes being found. Only to find that the Americans call anything pre-1980 'vintage' which makes me sad!

And I'm not sad at all about making the thread boring to others biggrin

perdu

4,884 posts

199 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2015
quotequote all
I've enjoyed most of it

Not the bits that I already knew of course

You know, when G-VULC lands at the intended time at the end of its seasion THAT IS IT

Its a shame but given the awful events at Shoreham most people wont fail to see the end of a perceived risk even though I would sit under her anywhere feeling completely safe

Me? I'd love it if the RAF had kept her on charge and I've enjoyed seeing her around and about, now she can join the other iconic machines that can see their last days out quietly impressing me in a museum

I even saw a Beaufort the other day, thought I'd never see one of those

558 deserves a nice quiet retirement now

With the other vintage or veteran airframes preserved for our enjoyment

aeropilot

34,591 posts

227 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
Lefty said:
I want to see a Lightning fly. Fat chance frown
Zero chance in the UK.......

However, it's still possible (further funding permitting) that XS422 may yet one day take to the skies again in the USA.

I have no idea what the current situation is regarding the remaining T.5 and two F.6's in SA?

Dollyman1850

6,318 posts

250 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
aeropilot said:
Zero chance in the UK.......

However, it's still possible (further funding permitting) that XS422 may yet one day take to the skies again in the USA.

I have no idea what the current situation is regarding the remaining T.5 and two F.6's in SA?
I had hear that thunder city was back up and running.
N.

richw_82

992 posts

186 months

Friday 4th September 2015
quotequote all
perdu said:
I've enjoyed most of it

Not the bits that I already knew of course

You know, when G-VULC lands at the intended time at the end of its seasion THAT IS IT
G-VULC has landed, never to fly again.

That particular aircraft is XM655 at Wellesbourne Mountford! G-VLCN is XH558...

perdu

4,884 posts

199 months

Friday 4th September 2015
quotequote all
richw_82 said:
perdu said:
I've enjoyed most of it

Not the bits that I already knew of course

You know, when G-VULC lands at the intended time at the end of its season THAT IS IT
G-VULC has landed, never to fly again.

That particular aircraft is XM655 at Wellesbourne Mountford! G-VLCN is XH558...
Gee - fancy me missing that

And I thought I knowed it all frown




And that adds to the sadness of what might be happening to 655 soon frown