Petition - Sentencing for criminal drivers that kill

Petition - Sentencing for criminal drivers that kill

Author
Discussion

carinaman

Original Poster:

21,291 posts

172 months

Wednesday 31st August 2016
quotequote all
I was unsure which forum to post that in. As it petitions parliament I thought I'd put it here.

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/156369


randlemarcus

13,521 posts

231 months

Wednesday 31st August 2016
quotequote all
Can we weaken sentencing for guilty victims as well, or is that word in there purely to highlight an emotional response?

carinaman

Original Poster:

21,291 posts

172 months

Wednesday 31st August 2016
quotequote all
The petitioner has some link to BRAKE! and it's not like them to press emotional buttons.

Trax

1,537 posts

232 months

Wednesday 31st August 2016
quotequote all
To be fair, the sentancing for crime is pretty fecked anyway. You can get longer in jail for lying about a speeding ticket than attacking someone.

If you kill someone by dangerous driving, then in my mind that is akin to murder, not some watered down manslaughter crime. Take for example the deaths today by the driver being chased by police. The suspect, should now be charged with the murder of two people, not a few years for death by dangerous driving.

Also, drive away from police, the sentence should match a sentence for attempted murder. I think that driving like a cock socket trying to get away from a police chase, is like walking around the high street blindfolded with a shotgun, firing indiscriminately and should be treated the same.

Dr Jekyll

23,820 posts

261 months

Wednesday 31st August 2016
quotequote all
Trax said:
Also, drive away from police, the sentence should match a sentence for attempted murder. I think that driving like a cock socket trying to get away from a police chase, is like walking around the high street blindfolded with a shotgun, firing indiscriminately and should be treated the same.
In that case yes, I don't see why they can't be shot there and then.

But not all RTA deaths are like that, some are just mistakes, EG someone reversing out of the garage without properly checking there grandchild really gone into the house to give an example local to me.

I'm all for a deterrent, but prison in those cases would have the opposite effect because it encourages other drivers to think it can't happen to them. After all they aren't the kind of people who go to prison and they would certainly never dream of murdering somebody.

davepoth

29,395 posts

199 months

Wednesday 31st August 2016
quotequote all
Trax said:
If you kill someone by dangerous driving, then in my mind that is akin to murder, not some watered down manslaughter crime. Take for example the deaths today by the driver being chased by police. The suspect, should now be charged with the murder of two people, not a few years for death by dangerous driving.
You'd be wrong in that case. Causing death by dangerous driving requires no criminal intent, whereas murder requires it. You can't compare the two.

saaby93

32,038 posts

178 months

Wednesday 31st August 2016
quotequote all
davepoth said:
Trax said:
If you kill someone by dangerous driving, then in my mind that is akin to murder, not some watered down manslaughter crime. Take for example the deaths today by the driver being chased by police. The suspect, should now be charged with the murder of two people, not a few years for death by dangerous driving.
You'd be wrong in that case. Causing death by dangerous driving requires no criminal intent, whereas murder requires it. You can't compare the two.
Trouble with that incident is you have to ask whether the driver would have behaved in such a way if he wasnt being pursued. Did something make the red mist set in and he was effectively out of control.
It's different to deliberately mowing people down as we saw in another incident not so long ago.

You've got the other end of the scale where someones not intended to kill eg if they swerve to miss a dog and end up taking someone out frown Should a careful driver aware of the risks take the dog instead.

Sentencing when you take into account all the facts is probably about right.
It's not about revenge




4x4Tyke

6,506 posts

132 months

Wednesday 31st August 2016
quotequote all
bks, the sentence does and should reflect the degree of wrong doing. Not the consequences.

A driver doing 31mph who knocks over a child as a result of poor attention receive a harsh sentence, while another doing 110mph, but luckily missed the kid escape justice. No that is moronic.

Sylvaforever

2,212 posts

98 months

Wednesday 31st August 2016
quotequote all
4x4Tyke said:
bks, the sentence does and should reflect the degree of wrong doing. Not the consequences.

A driver doing 31mph who knocks over a child as a result of poor attention receive a harsh sentence, while another doing 110mph, but luckily missed the kid escape justice. No that is moronic.
Cant really be bothered disecting this one...

OP.. all I would advise is the saying there for the Grace......

All that jazz

7,632 posts

146 months

Wednesday 31st August 2016
quotequote all
carinaman said:
I was unsure which forum to post that in. As it petitions parliament I thought I'd put it here.

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/156369

As it's clearly been started by Brake and you're the forum's Brake apologist, I'll pass thanks.

rxe

6,700 posts

103 months

Wednesday 31st August 2016
quotequote all
i have always wondered who funds Brake. So I bothered to look up the corporate sponsors:

http://www.brake.org.uk/fundraise/companies/partne...

Well, that's Deliveroo and Travis Perkins crossed off my list of companies to do business with.

Trax

1,537 posts

232 months

Wednesday 31st August 2016
quotequote all
davepoth said:
Trax said:
If you kill someone by dangerous driving, then in my mind that is akin to murder, not some watered down manslaughter crime. Take for example the deaths today by the driver being chased by police. The suspect, should now be charged with the murder of two people, not a few years for death by dangerous driving.
You'd be wrong in that case. Causing death by dangerous driving requires no criminal intent, whereas murder requires it. You can't compare the two.
I may be wrong, but I liken the two crimes. I believe the sentence for the scumbag who killed the two today, should be the same as someone who went out and decided to kill two random people.

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 31st August 2016
quotequote all
carinaman said:
I was unsure which forum to post that in. As it petitions parliament I thought I'd put it here.
Emotional twaddle, clearly using todays deaths to further their/your goals. Shove it.

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 31st August 2016
quotequote all
The petition's been running for about 8 weeks and got 16000 signatures. Very poor as these things go and I'm not surprised.

It's a pretty dumb or arrogant person who is certain that they or theirs could never be on the end of such a charge, through a moment of madness or even a mistake. There but for the grace.............., as said earlier.

Though there are occasionally cases that seem under or over-punished, I think this is one best left to the courts as it is.


Tango13

8,428 posts

176 months

Wednesday 31st August 2016
quotequote all
rxe said:
i have always wondered who funds Brake. So I bothered to look up the corporate sponsors:

http://www.brake.org.uk/fundraise/companies/partne...

Well, that's Deliveroo and Travis Perkins crossed off my list of companies to do business with.
Was it Castrol that dropped their sponsorship of 'Brake' like a sack of st after a few motoring/car owning forums put the word out to their members?

Smollet

10,557 posts

190 months

Wednesday 31st August 2016
quotequote all
davepoth said:
Trax said:
If you kill someone by dangerous driving, then in my mind that is akin to murder, not some watered down manslaughter crime. Take for example the deaths today by the driver being chased by police. The suspect, should now be charged with the murder of two people, not a few years for death by dangerous driving.
You'd be wrong in that case. Causing death by dangerous driving requires no criminal intent, whereas murder requires it. You can't compare the two.
Agreed

Funkycoldribena

7,379 posts

154 months

Wednesday 31st August 2016
quotequote all
fblm said:
Emotional twaddle, clearly using todays deaths to further their/your goals. Shove it.
Same here.Plus I'm sick of petitions.

davepoth

29,395 posts

199 months

Wednesday 31st August 2016
quotequote all
Trax said:
I may be wrong, but I liken the two crimes. I believe the sentence for the scumbag who killed the two today, should be the same as someone who went out and decided to kill two random people.
You are wrong. If there is enough evidence to prosecute for murder or manslaughter using a vehicle, the CPS will do so. There is precedent for doing that, if you recall PC Dave Phillips.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/pc-dave-phill...

CPS charged for murder but the jury found the defendant guilty of manslaughter in the alternative.


carinaman

Original Poster:

21,291 posts

172 months

Wednesday 31st August 2016
quotequote all
Trax said:
To be fair, the sentancing for crime is pretty fecked anyway. You can get longer in jail for lying about a speeding ticket than attacking someone.
I agree.

'Driving like that could kill somebody...

And if you do kill someone driving the penalties seem disproportinately low.

'Driving like that could kill somebody...

Couldn't more be done to raise the standards of driving on our roads?

Smollet

10,557 posts

190 months

Wednesday 31st August 2016
quotequote all
carinaman said:
Couldn't more be done to raise the standards of driving on our roads?
Yes. Regular mandatory refresher courses would be a start.