Seeking informed Jag thoughts...

Author
Discussion

SpecialAgentJoe

Original Poster:

4 posts

91 months

Thursday 8th December 2016
quotequote all
I'm considering acquiring an XJ-S next year. It depends on a few things and is based on sentimental reasons as much as anything else. My conundrum is that in an ideal world, I don't want it to lose too much value so I want to buy the right one. I'd get a decent, looked after, adult-owned model that has a good inspection to try to stay safe rather than a project. I feel I should probably buy a convertible but personally, I probably can't afford one and I don't really like rag tops because they're generally more expensive and, having had a few, I can't be doing with failing roof mechanisms, cracked canvases, replacements, leaks, vandalism, increased noise and particularly, a less stiff car with scuttle shake etc. Thing is, with regard to retaining as much of its valuable as possible, is it better to go for an earlier model or a later one? I know the earlier ones had electrical issues but for a car entering 'classic' status, is it better to go for an early model or to get a later, face-lifted model with gremlins supposedly ironed out? Also, looking around, there are some high milers out there - 150k and upwards...I'm guessing if I planned to sell it one day, a huge mileage wouldn't really help but would a FSH file help things? I think I'd try to get a 5.3L V12 but, failing that, a good 4.0 Celebration could be tempting because there seem to be a few around that have been well cared for although, obviously the latter are the newer ones. I'd welcome any input on this to help me make a more informed decision. Cheers

mph

2,332 posts

282 months

Thursday 8th December 2016
quotequote all
As with most classic cars my advice would be to buy the best example you can afford.

XJS values are rising, so if you buy wisely you should be safe enough. If you don't know enough to appraise the car yourself, take someone along who does. If you buy a bad example it will end up being very costly and you won't recoup the outlay.

Rather than get fixated on a particular year/model, which will narrow your options, I'd just keep an open mind and go for the best one you find.

The 4.0 celebration models are already attracting a premium, particularly low mileage examples. The rarer iterations will usually be the best investment but personally I wouldn't get hung up on that.

If you don't mind Japanese imports there are some cars in excellent low-mileage condition available for reasonable prices.

Good luck.

vixen1700

22,899 posts

270 months

Thursday 8th December 2016
quotequote all
Have you considered the 3.6?

I've had two XJS's, a 3.6 and a 4.0.

Really loved the 3.6, it felt and sounded like a Jag should, whereas the 4.0 felt it should be taking me slowly to the golf course every time I got in it.

My wife felt exactly the same, maybe it's to do with age, had the 3.6 in my 30s and the 4.0 in my 40s. confused

http://www.carandclassic.co.uk/car/C815854

This looks nice. smile

Edited by vixen1700 on Thursday 8th December 12:21


Edited to say I have no interest in golf which made me dislike the 4.0 even more.



Edited by vixen1700 on Thursday 8th December 23:40

ChasW

2,135 posts

202 months

Thursday 8th December 2016
quotequote all
When I was looking a few years ago the main tip I received was buy post-91 cars as the quality improved dramatically once Ford had taken control of manufacturing.

SpecialAgentJoe

Original Poster:

4 posts

91 months

Thursday 8th December 2016
quotequote all
Thanks for that advice. I hadn't really thought about the 3.6 too much but I guess that's still a good sized engine to pull the car along and probably more responsive than the bigger lumps. I think I'll look for the best one I can get for whatever money I have at the time regardless of engine size. Is the suspension the same on all models? I've only ever been in a 5.3 V12 Cabrio and couldn't get over what an amazing ride that thing had - I just don't want a Cabrio now though.

RobinSherwood

336 posts

215 months

Thursday 8th December 2016
quotequote all
The late Celebration models are amongst the most desirable but the other most desirable are the early pre HE cars.

Obviously it needs to be a good solid one as they rotted but survivors are rare and becoming increasingly desirable. The ultimate is a genuine V12 manual and I don't believe you would lose money on one bough correctly.

Amazing car to drive, feels so much more modern than its age. The six cylinder cars are wonderful and in reality close in performance to the V12 but ultimately you can't beat the experience in a GT car of that V12 up front. That or a V8 smile

TR4man

5,226 posts

174 months

Friday 9th December 2016
quotequote all
Just be aware that the XJS is actually quite a big car despite it being a 2+2 Coupe.

I was quite tempted by one earlier this year until I found it would not fit in my single garage!

LotusOmega375D

7,613 posts

153 months

Friday 9th December 2016
quotequote all
Pre-HE manuals have already shot up in value, so you won't get much for your money with one of those. Pre-HE autos are rising sharply and have that seventies "style" if you like that sort of thing. But the bargains are to be had in the originally better selling HE market, where you could find a mint low-miler for attractive money. They're under-stressed with the auto box and a bit more economical to run than the early cars. If you've got a bit more to spend, then go for a 1990s face-lift. You seem to have ruled out a convertible, so you could take your pick of the less expensive coupés out there, maybe even an 80s TWR version. Personally I never liked the look of the original halfway-house cabriolet T-bar model, but that might be an option for you to minimize scuttle shake and still feel the sun on your head.

I'd prefer a V12, but a 6 cylinder would also be fine and easier on the juice. A 6 cylinder manual could be the sweet point? They all look the same anyway.

Humper

946 posts

162 months

Friday 9th December 2016
quotequote all
XJS's keep getting tipped to be the "next big thing" but they're not really selling well, there are loads with little interest at reasonable prices, good time to be a buyer.

iSore

4,011 posts

144 months

Friday 9th December 2016
quotequote all
I had two or three of these. I love them, but they're a load of old st really. Very badly made in 70's BL fashion only worse.

A late 4.0 Coupe with low miles is the way to go. If you don't DIY, a V12 will bury you.

CharlesdeGaulle

26,263 posts

180 months

Friday 9th December 2016
quotequote all
I've recently sold one, a rare XJR-S, and already regret it. Don't listen to the doom-mongers, but do make sure you buy well. Rust will cost a lot of money to rectify, and a rusty car will sap your will to live.

As others have said, buy the best you can afford. Don't fixate on a particular model, just do your research, look at lots and buy the one that you think is lowest risk. In general, the later cars are better at most things, but the earlier ones are rarer and come in some fantastic colours! A V12 appeals because, well V12, but the 6 cyl models are good too. All of the engines are pretty robust, but you need proof of care.

If you're a classic or Jag newbie, I'd recommend the later cars in general, and a late-ish 4.0 would probably be the most sensible option.

Good luck; they are wonderful cars. Oh, and join the JEC - money well spent.

Grom1t

46 posts

147 months

Sunday 11th December 2016
quotequote all
I ran an 83 v12 for I guess 9 months then moved to a manual 93 facelift 4.0, both had comparable performance with the 4.0 turning in 23-26 mpg on a run, the v12 never got above 17mpg and short trips was half that.

Facelift is a much nicer car IMHO

austinsmirk

5,597 posts

123 months

Wednesday 14th December 2016
quotequote all
some huge info to be had from searching in readers rides re: jag purchase.