XH558 - VTTS Stitch Up

Author
Discussion

ecsrobin

17,119 posts

165 months

Monday 31st July 2017
quotequote all
To be fair you could see this happening all along but people keep believing what VTTS are saying.

There were a few of us that used to get put down for saying how badly run VTTS was run, it’s nice to see people finally realising it’s the case. Sadly though there are those who just can’t see it and no doubt wasted thousands of ££ supporting a project which has no real future.

Take all your money elsewhere and invest in some other project like the people’s mosquitto for instance.

aeropilot

34,604 posts

227 months

Monday 31st July 2017
quotequote all
ecsrobin said:
To be fair you could see this happening all along but people keep believing what VTTS are saying.

There were a few of us that used to get put down for saying how badly run VTTS was run, it’s nice to see people finally realising it’s the case. Sadly though there are those who just can’t see it and no doubt wasted thousands of ££ supporting a project which has no real future.
yes


ecsrobin said:
Take all your money elsewhere and invest in some other project like the people’s mosquitto for instance.
nono

That's even more un-realistic than the '558 situation!

NX611's return to the air is the most sensible place for anyone to put their donations. Its realistically achievable and is currently being carefully planned and executed.



Lurking Lawyer

4,534 posts

225 months

Monday 31st July 2017
quotequote all
aeropilot said:
nono

That's even more un-realistic than the '558 situation!
How so?

(I'm not disagreeing - I know next to nothing about the project, just that it's out there and like a lot of other people I'd quite like to see a Mossie flying again)

aeropilot

34,604 posts

227 months

Monday 31st July 2017
quotequote all
Lurking Lawyer said:
aeropilot said:
nono

That's even more un-realistic than the '558 situation!
How so?

(I'm not disagreeing - I know next to nothing about the project, just that it's out there and like a lot of other people I'd quite like to see a Mossie flying again)
So would I, probably more so than an about anything else in the UK, but I'm also a realist, and there are some BIG stumbling blocks to this, namely they are starting with nothing other than an identity.
It reportedly cost Jerry Yagen about $7m to get his FB.26 into the air and there was enough substantial parts of KA114 still extant to actually look like a pile of Mosquito bits, and so the parts find was just achievable but still not easy. There is a very finite amount of available Mossie parts left, and the people that have them, want a lot of money for them. Yagen also didn't have to worry about the extra cost of certification requirements for new build required by the CAA for UK registration.

Essentially, this project is going to have to raise £1m per annum ever year for the next 6-7 years to stand a chance of happening, all the while without there being a lot to show for it to many of the people donating that perhaps can't understand the process.

Its not impossible, its only money, but........IMHO, unless they get a BIG donation to really kick start it, or be able to buy Glyn Powell's own project and parts stock, it will fizzle out in the coming years.

ecsrobin

17,119 posts

165 months

Monday 31st July 2017
quotequote all
aeropilot said:
nono

That's even more un-realistic than the '558 situation!

NX611's return to the air is the most sensible place for anyone to put their donations. Its realistically achievable and is currently being carefully planned and executed.


Yep you’re probably right. I don’t know much about either project but I believe you’re right in saying NX611 has the best chance of being airworthy.

However I still don’t think we’ll see just jane flying but every time I see a report they appear to be closer to their aim.

aeropilot

34,604 posts

227 months

Monday 31st July 2017
quotequote all
ecsrobin said:
aeropilot said:
nono

That's even more un-realistic than the '558 situation!

NX611's return to the air is the most sensible place for anyone to put their donations. Its realistically achievable and is currently being carefully planned and executed.



However I still don’t think we’ll see just jane flying but every time I see a report they appear to be closer to their aim.
I don't think you are going to spend nearly a quarter of a million quid on 4 x freshly zero timed airworthy Merlins unless you intend flying the thing, so while it will certainly be another couple of years yet, I think she'll fly again.

The Canadians have heavily hinted that they raise the funds to fly Vera back across the Atlantic again once JJ is back in the air for the chance to fly all 3 Lancs together.

No reason why JJ couldn't also do the reverse and do a tour of Canada/North America with Vera, as the BBMF will never be allowed to do so.
BBMF is also restricted as to how far they can cross the channel for events as well, so JJ could earn some nice appearance fees in further afield European events.

I wouldn't mind a small bet we might see her in the air by 2020/1.

slartibartfast

4,014 posts

201 months

Monday 31st July 2017
quotequote all
Regards JJ, I was told 3 to 5 years and 3 million quid needed.
Saw her at EK while stripped and the moving surfaces all had tags suggesting 'unairworthy', She needs a lot of work, complete strip down and at present they are raising the money via fast taxiing.
I also got told that they don't want anyone chipping in with large donations as they want JJ to be theirs and not have any 'share holder' suggest any ideas or having a claim on which direction they should take.

Regards the tin triangle, they 'vtts' get worse with each announcement I read and just wish people would open their eyes and donate to a much worthier cause, 558 won't ever be seen in the sky ever again and that is pretty much fact whereas the chance of us having two lancs (a 3rd if VeRA) visits again is imo very worthy.

And like someone else has said 'having bought 4x zero hour Merlins' does show they are serious about getting her in the air

ChemicalChaos

10,393 posts

160 months

Monday 31st July 2017
quotequote all
Let's not forget the Shackleton WR963, either!
Poor Rich and his dad have had a terrible time recently with some very small minded people people repeatedly trying to sabotage the project, but she is steadily improving despite the limitations of outside storage and they are determined to see her back in the air

SantaBarbara

3,244 posts

108 months

Monday 31st July 2017
quotequote all
The air museum near York maybe possible

perdu

4,884 posts

199 months

Tuesday 1st August 2017
quotequote all
I would say the Shackleton has to be the best bet in the 'medium' term

Who wouldn't love to hear four mighty grumbling Griffons back in the air?

And Rich and co have had a bloody awful time lately, it would be good to see them getting the support they/WE need to see her fly

JeremyH5

1,584 posts

135 months

Wednesday 16th August 2017
quotequote all
Crikey! Latest email is offering fleeces for £90. Nice logos front and back; but wow, that price for Regatta fleeces?

ecsrobin

17,119 posts

165 months

Wednesday 16th August 2017
quotequote all
JeremyH5 said:
Crikey! Latest email is offering fleeces for £90. Nice logos front and back; but wow, that price for Regatta fleeces?
And yet fools will still pay it.

It reminds of them scams from people claiming to be from Microsoft. I’m surprised it’s not been on watchdog yet.

surveyor

17,825 posts

184 months

Thursday 17th August 2017
quotequote all
Passed by last week when departing. Parked next to the old bus together with the Canberra.

Riley Blue

20,955 posts

226 months

Thursday 17th August 2017
quotequote all
ecsrobin said:
And yet fools will still pay it.

It reminds of them scams from people claiming to be from Microsoft. I’m surprised it’s not been on watchdog yet.
But they're limited edition, one of a kind, never to be repeated, individually numbered 1 to 558 - how can you resist...?

HoHoHo

14,987 posts

250 months

Thursday 17th August 2017
quotequote all
Riley Blue said:
ecsrobin said:
And yet fools will still pay it.

It reminds of them scams from people claiming to be from Microsoft. I’m surprised it’s not been on watchdog yet.
But they're limited edition, one of a kind, never to be repeated, individually numbered 1 to 558 - how can you resist...?
Surprisingly easily TBH yes

ecsrobin

17,119 posts

165 months

Thursday 17th August 2017
quotequote all
Riley Blue said:
ecsrobin said:
And yet fools will still pay it.

It reminds of them scams from people claiming to be from Microsoft. I’m surprised it’s not been on watchdog yet.
But they're limited edition, one of a kind, never to be repeated, individually numbered 1 to 558 - how can you resist...?
Until they run out of money and do another run “it’s our last year, hold on maybe it’s our last year next year” rofl

aeropilot

34,604 posts

227 months

Thursday 17th August 2017
quotequote all
ecsrobin said:
Riley Blue said:
ecsrobin said:
And yet fools will still pay it.

It reminds of them scams from people claiming to be from Microsoft. I’m surprised it’s not been on watchdog yet.
But they're limited edition, one of a kind, never to be repeated, individually numbered 1 to 558 - how can you resist...?
Until they run out of money and do another run “it’s our last year, hold on maybe it’s our last year next year” rofl
I'm baffled by all the 'last airworthy Vulcan' blurb in all this latest VTTS propaganda mission........??
What airworthy Vulcan are they talking about laugh



RoverP6B

4,338 posts

128 months

Thursday 24th August 2017
quotequote all
Meanwhile, XL426 is toasty warm and dry in her new hangar, with a nice shiny new end cap on the No2 engine...

...which rather suggests that a working airport CAN be a viable home for a live Vulcan. Just not Finningley!

DrDeAtH

3,588 posts

232 months

Friday 25th August 2017
quotequote all
RoverP6B said:
Meanwhile, XL426 is toasty warm and dry in her new hangar, with a nice shiny new end cap on the No2 engine...

...which rather suggests that a working airport CAN be a viable home for a live Vulcan. Just not Finningley!
New end caps on no2 and 3... No4 was repaired. Just no1 to get done now.....

skwdenyer

16,501 posts

240 months

Saturday 26th August 2017
quotequote all
gazapc said:
Even if they get an instant cash injection to fully fund a hanger tomorrow, surely it will take 12 months minimum to get it designed, planning approved and the thing built. Likely longer as they now have to raise the cash for it.
If the new hanger were a storage warehouse then in principle it would not require planning: https://www.planningportal.co.uk/info/200130/commo... would it?
There are pop-up temporary hanger-like structures that can be constructed quickly and cheaply too - are they specifically forbidden at airports?
Just putting up a building to cover the birds need not have cost a vast amount at all, need it?