XH558 - VTTS Stitch Up

Author
Discussion

aeropilot

34,692 posts

228 months

Thursday 19th January 2017
quotequote all
z06tim said:
ChemicalChaos said:
Ginetta G15 Girl said:
Cosford is a tad under 3900 ft so not a chance. It was marginal getting the Dominies in there back in the late 1990s!

Anyway Cosford already has a (Black Buck) Vulcan in the Cold War Hall.
Didnt realise the runway at Cosford was so small!


As an aside - we know the Vulcan and Canberra are now at risk, but no-one has mentioned the Swift also in that hangar - does it still belong to Jet Art? Is it considered inconsequential because it can easily be trucked away like how it was delivered?
How did the Cosford Vulcan get there? Was the runway longer back then?
It was flown in, pilot was Sqn.Ldr Reeve, one of the Black Buck pilots.
The Cosford Vulcan, was famously, the so-nearly Black Buck Vulcan, having been the primary a/c for the first raid, before going tech, and then being reserve a/c a few times, and then being primary a/c again for Black Buck 4 which was aborted, and then it was reserve for BB 5 & 6. So, it never dropped anything in anger!

It was also one of the Exercise Sunflower Vulcan that deployed to Aus/NZ in 1973.

Halmyre

11,222 posts

140 months

Thursday 19th January 2017
quotequote all
z06tim said:
ChemicalChaos said:
Ginetta G15 Girl said:
Cosford is a tad under 3900 ft so not a chance. It was marginal getting the Dominies in there back in the late 1990s!

Anyway Cosford already has a (Black Buck) Vulcan in the Cold War Hall.
Didnt realise the runway at Cosford was so small!


As an aside - we know the Vulcan and Canberra are now at risk, but no-one has mentioned the Swift also in that hangar - does it still belong to Jet Art? Is it considered inconsequential because it can easily be trucked away like how it was delivered?
How did the Cosford Vulcan get there? Was the runway longer back then?
Landed there in 1983, after an aborted attempt.

http://www.rafmuseum.org.uk/documents/collections/...

"The Captain, S/L John Reeve made one 'touch and go' landing followed by a final
15 minute circuit before finally touching down at 12.50 pm.The brake parachute
deployed immediately and the aircraft stopped in less than two thirds of the
runway's length."

Cosford's Valiant was delivered piecemeal:

http://twittervforce.com/blog/?p=323

Think the Victor was delivered in the same manner.

Cosford is well worth a day's visit, and it's free. Despite which, doesn't stop miserable buggers complaining on Trip Adviser about the cost of parking - four quid all day; still a hell of a lot cheaper than Duxford.

The only gripe about Cosford is that the V-bombers are all crammed in a bit too closely.

z06tim

558 posts

187 months

Thursday 19th January 2017
quotequote all
Thanks both. Good info. I guessed she "must" have been flown in.

I must get myself back to Cosford. Not been in 15+ years!

ChemicalChaos

10,404 posts

161 months

Thursday 19th January 2017
quotequote all
So, what about Scampton then? Lots of people seem to be suggesting that they actually want it there and have a suitable hangar waiting too.

aeropilot

34,692 posts

228 months

Thursday 19th January 2017
quotequote all
HoHoHo said:
And if Dr. P is on nearly £300k per annum he should be bloody ashamed of himself.
Not that high, between 70k and 80k according to a recent article in 'Aeroplane' magazine.

Don't even know why he still has a full time salary for a static airframe frankly.
The volunteer teams that look after 655 and 426 would likely kill for a yearly budget of 70k to look after their Vulcans!!

spitfire-ian

3,842 posts

229 months

Thursday 19th January 2017
quotequote all
What annoyed me on reading the email last night was that up until now they've been 'spinning' the whole hangar move as the airport needing it back because it needed the space and that the move to the smaller hangar would still include tours, etc.

DrDeAtH

3,588 posts

233 months

Thursday 19th January 2017
quotequote all
aeropilot said:
The volunteer teams that look after 655 and 426 would likely kill for a yearly budget of 70k to look after their Vulcans!!
Yes we would! We do as much as we can with the amount of monies donated, (I work on 426 btw).

Edited by DrDeAtH on Thursday 19th January 11:40

Riley Blue

20,987 posts

227 months

Thursday 19th January 2017
quotequote all
What is deeply saddening about this situation is that it was entirely predictable given the lack of attraction of 558 once it had completed its final flight to became just another static Vulcan. Only a naive fool would have built a business plan around the public appeal of a grounded Vulcan at an operational airport during a worsening international security scenario. Even had the aircraft been unique, its widespread public appeal would have been limited, a single aircraft does not justify a family day out but with other Vulcans around in air museums around the UK, it should have been obvious to all but the blinkered that income would be drastically reduced.

To have continued to employ almost two dozen people at a cost of hundreds of thousands of pounds is financial irresponsibility, it's hard to imagine the auditors didn't draw attention to this long before now.

What does the future hold for 558? Not much, I suggest, if it remains at Doncaster. The options for a good home elsewhere are obvious, Bruntingthorpe being the most logical but it'll probably cost in the region of a quarter of a million to move it there, or anywhere else. It's time VTTS realised it has no future with them and accept that a new owner at an appropriate location is required - but I'm not holding my breath...

saaby93

32,038 posts

179 months

Thursday 19th January 2017
quotequote all
Why the knockers?
Without VTTS we wouldnt have had a great few years of seeing a Vulcan on display

ChemicalChaos

10,404 posts

161 months

Thursday 19th January 2017
quotequote all
saaby93 said:
Why the knockers?
Without VTTS we wouldnt have had a great few years of seeing a Vulcan on display
Because like most charities, it seems to have become a bloated, arrogant entity more concerned with justifying its own existence

HoHoHo

14,987 posts

251 months

Thursday 19th January 2017
quotequote all
saaby93 said:
Why the knockers?
Without VTTS we wouldnt have had a great few years of seeing a Vulcan on display
Because I personally donated loads of money and my company also supported VTTS and I along with others was promised a future for 558.

It appears that may well not be the case.

We can't even see it taxi run FFS!

Riley Blue

20,987 posts

227 months

Thursday 19th January 2017
quotequote all
saaby93 said:
Why the knockers?
Without VTTS we wouldnt have had a great few years of seeing a Vulcan on display
I joined the club, bought the T shirt, travelled to see and supported VTTS as much as I could for quite a few years. I've been increasingly bewildered at some of the business decisions made by those in control of the project so none of what has now occurred comes as a big surprise - that's why.

V41LEY

2,895 posts

239 months

Thursday 19th January 2017
quotequote all
I've supported her for a long time so this is really depressing news. Looking at the VTTS FB comments, I'm sure the trustees will be having many sleepless nights. If they issued a share issue to move her to Brunty, I'd support that.

ChemicalChaos

10,404 posts

161 months

Thursday 19th January 2017
quotequote all
V41LEY said:
I've supported her for a long time so this is really depressing news. Looking at the VTTS FB comments, I'm sure the trustees will be having many sleepless nights. If they issued a share issue to move her to Brunty, I'd support that.
As previously said, there's too many issues of politics and storage with Brunty. Really, Scampton is the best bet if they move it anywhere - but who would stomach the idea of it being cut up to move? (barring swine committing aviation and the CAA granting a transit permit)



In the meantime, I shall be switching my funding to much more promising new projects, such as the ongoing restoration of the Shackleton (documented on here and slowly recovering themselves from a major setback), and the move of the Phantom "Black Mike" from Leuchars to Brunty whilst retaining its running condition, to partake in future ground runs

aeropilot

34,692 posts

228 months

Thursday 19th January 2017
quotequote all
saaby93 said:
Why the knockers?
Without VTTS we wouldnt have had a great few years of seeing a Vulcan on display
We're not knocking what was achieved in getting it flying and keep it flying.
What was going to happen once it stopped flying was, and always has been, a point of contention, and VTTS have consistently shown to be lacking logic and common sense on this point....and we now appear to be exactly where most people (other than VTTS and the blinkered) predicted we'd end up.


gazapc

1,321 posts

161 months

Thursday 19th January 2017
quotequote all
Depressing news. I have been following the facebook comments and its certainly not happy reading. To be honest, with the debarcle with the secret last flights and lack of taxi runs as promised you knew something would happen. And 22 full time employees, jeez! I certainly won't be donating anymore until a long term plan is sorted.

I would desperately hope a transit flight could be made possible but have yet to see any credible evidence that it could be done.

Does anyone also know where XH558 will be stored. It just says 'in storage' but is that even in a hanger??

WelshChris

1,179 posts

255 months

Thursday 19th January 2017
quotequote all
saaby93 said:
Why the knockers?
Without VTTS we wouldnt have had a great few years of seeing a Vulcan on display
It seems to me that the whole project has been mis-managed since before the final flight, and that Dr.Pleming must have an ego larger than the hanger needed to house XH558.

They need to start answering questions, and justifying their strategy and decisions to the many people who have contributed. Pressure should be put upon the charities commission to extract answers from the trustees who have both a moral and legal duty to provide them.

Kitchski

6,516 posts

232 months

Friday 20th January 2017
quotequote all
I've always been concerned about their plans for the thing once it had stopped flying. To me, the natural thing to do either seemed to be to park it up at a museum (which would make it easily accessible for the public, as well as providing a boost to the chosen museum's footfall), or as many have suggested to lay it up at Bruntingthorpe with the other Cold War beasts. Grounded aircraft housed at airfields is always a risky business, as the land could be sold for development (see Wellesbourne). But, firstly Brunters is huge (they could sell half of it and still carry on as normal) and secondly, Mr Walton loves his aircraft! It's down to him that 558 ever flew again in the first place. Top man.

Nobody can deny what an achievement VTTS have made, but their plans for post-flight look a bit......optimistic? All very noble, wanting to build an education centre around it, but is one aeroplane REALLY enough to be the centre of something like that?
They must have known that once it was grounded, the money would largely dry up. People have been paying to see it in the air. As it stands now, it's no more deserving of funds than 655, or 426 at Southend. And the guys and gals who maintain those don't employ lots of people and don't have a CEO who takes home a colossal salary. Personally I think he's got some cheek to take as much as he does, when the money is all donated by people probably considerably worse-off than he is, but there you go. I don't know the full story, of course. Very few of us do.

I visited it last year, bought a load of gear in the shop etc, and I love the thing. Didn't want to leave, and could have stayed there all day (I did, actually - we stayed until the guys there wanted to go home!) But when we entered the reception, it was all very posh. I couldn't help but wonder how much all that cost, and whether those funds could have been used on something more important. Nobody is going to judge 558 on the poshness of the hanger's reception!

For the future, personally speaking, I'd say it's knackered. They won't be able to fly it anywhere else, and it's in a pretty bad location. My guess is that it'll be dismantled (with an angle grinder) sometime in the next few years, and either transported to a museum (as per the one at Hendon), or transported to the tip. Hope I'm wrong.

CrutyRammers

13,735 posts

199 months

Friday 20th January 2017
quotequote all
Saw the email the other day, and couldn't believe it. What a balls-up frown

DrDeAtH

3,588 posts

233 months

Friday 20th January 2017
quotequote all
aeropilot said:
saaby93 said:
Why the knockers?
Without VTTS we wouldnt have had a great few years of seeing a Vulcan on display
We're not knocking what was achieved in getting it flying and keep it flying.
What was going to happen once it stopped flying was, and always has been, a point of contention, and VTTS have consistently shown to be lacking logic and common sense on this point....and we now appear to be exactly where most people (other than VTTS and the blinkered) predicted we'd end up.
VTTS were the real reason behind why technical support was pulled. They tried to dictate to RR and Marshall's what was expected of them...

Understandably the support was pulled.