Post amazingly cool pictures of aircraft (Volume 1)

Post amazingly cool pictures of aircraft (Volume 1)

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

wooooody

918 posts

238 months

Sunday 25th November 2007
quotequote all







dodgyviper

1,197 posts

239 months

Sunday 25th November 2007
quotequote all
Laird said:


Apparently the deceased was a civilian engineer, I await the inquiry with interest. What's Duke been up to then?
Only a wee bit of tax evasion and accepting bribes - its all in wiki if you'd like more dets

Eric Mc

122,140 posts

266 months

Sunday 25th November 2007
quotequote all
He was a Congressman who abused his position. It's the old story of power corrupting, I'm afraid.

mko9

2,413 posts

213 months

Sunday 25th November 2007
quotequote all
MK4 Slowride said:
The Brits are infinitely more skilled than the Yanks + if your actually close to the ground to see what's going on you tend not to attack your own side.
And if you are close to the ground you can get your a$$ shot down by any knucklehead with an AK-47, as your infinitely superior Tornado pilots found out in DESERT STORM.

jmorgan

36,010 posts

285 months

Sunday 25th November 2007
quotequote all
Someone else put this up a while ago.
http://www.aviationpics.de/airshow/airshow.htm
Third one down.

Sport Coupe

415 posts

199 months

Sunday 25th November 2007
quotequote all
Surfed the net for a little while earlier on and found some great chopper pics:







Eric Mc

122,140 posts

266 months

Sunday 25th November 2007
quotequote all
Tornadoes were lost in Desert Storm NOT because they were caught by AK-47 fire, but because they were tasked with the most dangerous missions of the war i.e. laying runway denial munitions on Iraqi airfields using the JP233 dispenser. This entailed flying low and fast along the length of the runway ejecting the bomblets along the runway. Unfortunately, this ensured that Iraqi AAA could just place a wall of flak right into the path of the Tornadoes ensuring thet they would be hit. The Americans didn't do these missions, not because they wreen't brave or skilled, but because they didn't possess a weapon so effective at rendering an airfield unuseable.

As soon as these missions had achieved their aim, the Tornadoes reverted to a medium height bombing role, assisted by target marking Bucaneers.

mko9

2,413 posts

213 months

Sunday 25th November 2007
quotequote all
My point exactly, the AK reference was figurative but no less true. At 50ft you are vulnerable to every weapon the enemy can aim at you, from 9mm on up.

The USAF has a weapon perfectly capable of interdicting a runway from 20,000ft. It's called a GBU-10. In more modern times JDAMs work just as well. Reference ALLIED FORCE.

snotrag

14,495 posts

212 months

Sunday 25th November 2007
quotequote all
Best thread ever guys.

What is it about aircraft that makes them so photogenic?

Some of these photos are truly brilliant.

Eric Mc

122,140 posts

266 months

Sunday 25th November 2007
quotequote all
Then why were the RAF specifically asked to carry out these missions?

From what I know, GBU-10 actually destroys the runway. JP233 DENIES the runway by leaving unexploded munitions laying about - thereby leaving the runways useable at a later date if and when the enemy loses possesion of them.

I'm not saying JP233 was a brilliantly conceived piece of kit - but it was the weapon of choice of the commanders in Gulf War 1 when it came to preventing the Iraqis from using their air bases.

glazbagun

14,294 posts

198 months

Sunday 25th November 2007
quotequote all
While the merits of high vs low/medium level bombing runs makes for an interesting subject, is there any chance we could start another thread for it & keep this one for, say, posting Amazingly Cool Pictures of Aircraft?

Eric Mc

122,140 posts

266 months

Sunday 25th November 2007
quotequote all
No.

tubbystu

3,846 posts

261 months

Sunday 25th November 2007
quotequote all
speedtwelve said:
lick Wow, that is stunning.

idea Is it a commercially avialable shot ?

anonymous-user

55 months

Sunday 25th November 2007
quotequote all
I've spent a few hours taking photos of aircraft, here are a few of mine.
Not amazingly cool, but I hope you like them.


MH434 & Ray Hanna at Biggin Hill 2005.



GR4 at Southend in 2006.



Jag departure at Waddington 2006.



F16 North Weald 2006



Lancaster, Eastbourne 2006.



Hunter, Canberra & Sea Vixen, Lydd 2006



Typhoon & Lancaster, Coningsby 2007.



Typhoons at Coningsby.



BBMF show Duxford 07.



E3 Biggin Hill 07.



A10 Lakenheath 07.



B1-B Fairford arrivals 07.



Spanish AF Typhoon, Fairford 07.



Reds/BBMF Anniversary flypast, Fairford 07.







Eric Mc

122,140 posts

266 months

Sunday 25th November 2007
quotequote all
Great shots.

I particularly like the B&W shot of the Lanc.

tank slapper

7,949 posts

284 months

Sunday 25th November 2007
quotequote all
mko9 said:
My point exactly, the AK reference was figurative but no less true. At 50ft you are vulnerable to every weapon the enemy can aim at you, from 9mm on up.

The USAF has a weapon perfectly capable of interdicting a runway from 20,000ft. It's called a GBU-10. In more modern times JDAMs work just as well. Reference ALLIED FORCE.
But at the time they did not - laser guided bombs were in the minority in 1991, with several packages being rushed into use so they could be used. In fact, most of the Tornados shot down were hit while lofting dumb bombs onto their targets at low level. Only one was lost while delivering JP233, and that was after the attack had been completed successfully.

Laird

39,731 posts

285 months

Sunday 25th November 2007
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Then why were the RAF specifically asked to carry out these missions?

From what I know, GBU-10 actually destroys the runway. JP233 DENIES the runway by leaving unexploded munitions laying about - thereby leaving the runways useable at a later date if and when the enemy loses possesion of them.

I'm not saying JP233 was a brilliantly conceived piece of kit - but it was the weapon of choice of the commanders in Gulf War 1 when it came to preventing the Iraqis from using their air bases.
JP 233 served 2 purposes, the first section dropped weapons to pierce the surface and erupt underneath to destroy it, the second was to deploy anti personnel weapons to injure repair crews

as you were

K13 WJD

275 posts

201 months

Sunday 25th November 2007
quotequote all
supraman....

im impressed with your photo's.....im a huge fan of the typhoon/eurofighter.....

maybe you can find me a pic....in 2004 i was in the states, where a saw a flypast of 4 planes.....it was at the pepsi 400, daytona.....one of which was out of this world.....it was MASSIVE, compared to the fighters next to it, like 10 times the size of tornado......anyhow...it was black, of stealth apperance......but more inportantly had 4 SQUARE jet outputs.....with 3 rings on afterburn........i did take a photo, but can't find it...would know it if i saw it again !!!

if memory serves me it was a lockheed f10 if there is such a thing

Edited by K13 WJD on Sunday 25th November 17:54

moleamol

15,887 posts

264 months

Sunday 25th November 2007
quotequote all
K13 WJD said:
supraman....

im impressed with your photo's.....im a huge fan of the typhoon/eurofighter.....

maybe you can find me a pic....in 2004 i was in the states, where a saw a flypast of 4 planes.....it was at the pepsi 400, daytona.....one of which was out of this world.....it was MASSIVE, compared to the fighters next to it, like 10 times the size of tornado......anyhow...it was black, of stealth apperance......but more inportantly had 4 SQUARE jet outputs.....with 3 rings on afterburn........i did take a photo, but can't find it...would know it if i saw it again !!!

if memory serves me it was a lockheed f10 if there is such a thing

Edited by K13 WJD on Sunday 25th November 17:54
F117A Stealth Fighter?



Or maybe the bomber if it really was huge:


anonymous-user

55 months

Sunday 25th November 2007
quotequote all
Only thing I can think of that size (4 engines) with re-heat is the Rockwell B1, sometimes that doesn't light up on all 4 burners.

B2 doesn't have reheat, neither the F117A, which is Tornado size.






TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED