Post amazingly cool pictures of aircraft (Volume 2)

Post amazingly cool pictures of aircraft (Volume 2)

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

Total loss

2,138 posts

228 months

Saturday 10th January 2015
quotequote all
Dr Jekyll said:
Andy Zarse said:
Dr Jekyll said:
We also used a .22 with a Martini action, don't know how common they were in ATC circles.
What century are we talking about? wink
20th, 1970s to be precise.
Lee Enfields and one Martini 22. Lee Enfield 303s and on a camp Browning (I think) 22 automatic pistols.
We also had a Martini 22 as well as the standard 22/303's in my Squadron, Ox/Bucks/Berks wing in the '70's'. I was in the shooting team (we were the wing team & went to Bisley every year for the Cadet 100 competition) and was lucky to have a CI who had a huge weapon collection + his friend who had an even bigger one,so when on team practice on the outdoor ranges which was very frequent, we probably got to 'play' with just about every rifle/pistol you could imagine. Very happy days

MartG

20,694 posts

205 months

Saturday 10th January 2015
quotequote all
Video clip of a crosswind landing at Leeds today - a bit breezy

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=4bf_1420820439

ApOrbital

9,966 posts

119 months

Sunday 11th January 2015
quotequote all
yellowjack said:
[geek mode]Can't be a Falklands mod wink That's a Bren, in the true sense of it being the curved magazine and conical flash eliminator original 1930s designed .303" (rimmed) cartridge version license produced in UK. In the 1950s a large number of true 'Bren' guns were converted to fire the standard NATO 7.62×51mm rimless cartridge, with a slotted flash eliminator similar to the L1A1 SLR and a magazine with significantly less 'curve' to it which was interchangeable with the magazine from the SLR These were designated L4 Light Machine Gun. They certainly wouldn't have taken an original .303 Bren to the Falklands in 1982 - there'd have been no bullets for it, silly![/geek mode]
What plane is it vulcan?

Mojocvh

16,837 posts

263 months

Sunday 11th January 2015
quotequote all
Dr Jekyll said:
Andy Zarse said:
Dr Jekyll said:
We also used a .22 with a Martini action, don't know how common they were in ATC circles.
What century are we talking about? wink
20th, 1970s to be precise.
Lee Enfields and one Martini 22. Lee Enfield 303s and on a camp Browning (I think) 22 automatic pistols.
Best weekend camp caliber we got to fire was 40mm.........

..and before anyone complains about non aviation content it was at a target towed by a Canberra, ok/

Edited by Mojocvh on Sunday 11th January 13:21

Eric Mc

122,055 posts

266 months

Sunday 11th January 2015
quotequote all
ApOrbital said:
What plane is it vulcan?
Yes.

yellowjack

17,080 posts

167 months

Sunday 11th January 2015
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
ApOrbital said:
What plane is it vulcan?
Yes.
It's XL 426, the Southend Vulcan...



ApOrbital

9,966 posts

119 months

Sunday 11th January 2015
quotequote all
Thanks never knew they had gunners.

hidetheelephants

24,472 posts

194 months

Sunday 11th January 2015
quotequote all
A Belfast too.

yellowjack

17,080 posts

167 months

Sunday 11th January 2015
quotequote all
ApOrbital said:
Thanks never knew they had gunners.
At the risk of a parrot for me, and for the benefit of those who don't know, I'll bite...




...a couple of years ago, XH558 tried to stop after her Saturday display at Farnborough without deploying the brake 'chute. The resultant failure of the hydraulic braking system (and Marshalls alleged inability/refusal to repair it at the weekend) cost them the display on the Sunday. Whisper it, but the intention had been to hold her at a high angle to the wind, in order to save the cost of deploying the parachute, using the massive delta as one big air brake, assisted by the hydraulic units on the main gear. 'Twas a sad sight, watching the tug tow her off the runway at the end of the day, and there was a great deal of chuntering from elements of Sunday's crowd, some of whom naively (and again, allegedly) tried to get refunds because the Vulcan wasn't displaying.

ApOrbital

9,966 posts

119 months

Monday 12th January 2015
quotequote all
Thick mate of mine told me at the weekend *all the vulcans are going back up in the air ready for war* Told him we have one XH558 and it is funded by the public for display only.

Andy Zarse

10,868 posts

248 months

Monday 12th January 2015
quotequote all
ApOrbital said:
Thick mate of mine told me at the weekend *all the vulcans are going back up in the air ready for war* Told him we have one XH558 and it is funded by the public for display only.
Thick? Mentally ill more like.

Eric Mc

122,055 posts

266 months

Monday 12th January 2015
quotequote all
ApOrbital said:
Thick mate of mine told me at the weekend *all the vulcans are going back up in the air ready for war* Told him we have one XH558 and it is funded by the public for display only.
Why is he your mate?

Mojocvh

16,837 posts

263 months

Monday 12th January 2015
quotequote all

MartG

20,694 posts

205 months

Monday 12th January 2015
quotequote all







Mojocvh

16,837 posts

263 months

Monday 12th January 2015
quotequote all
Interesting find martG, considering the initial loss rate [both airframes AND pilots] of the Crusader on it's carrier service introduction perhaps this should have been more numerous?

Total loss

2,138 posts

228 months

Monday 12th January 2015
quotequote all
yellowjack said:



but the intention had been to hold her at a high angle to the wind, in order to save the cost of deploying the parachute,
What cost is there deploying the shute , is it not just folded up & put back in the tail ?

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

256 months

Monday 12th January 2015
quotequote all


That fin's a bit rude....

yellowjack

17,080 posts

167 months

Monday 12th January 2015
quotequote all
Total loss said:
yellowjack said:



but the intention had been to hold her at a high angle to the wind, in order to save the cost of deploying the parachute,
What cost is there deploying the shute , is it not just folded up & put back in the tail ?
How reliable the info I've found is, I don't know...

in 2013 the Bournemouth Daily Echo said:
Even her 60-foot brake parachute – used to splendid effect when she lands at Bournemouth International – costs £1,000 a pop because it has to be painstakingly re-folded by hand.
http://m.bournemouthecho.co.uk/news/10642279.Vulca...meet_the_couple_helping_to_keep_the_much_loved_aircraft_in_the_skies/?ref=mac
in 2010 the Daily Mail said:
In addition, all 33 onboard fire extinguishers have to be upgraded at a cost of £33,000, and the brake parachutes need to be replaced at a cost of £54,000.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1243857/Wo...
The braking parachute is a flight safety critical item. The old bird can't go up without it. And it's a 'lifed' item too, so it has to be replaced when it's timed operational life is up.

The old bits they take off '558 are often sold, auctioned, or raffled, if they cannot be refurbished or 're-lifed', thereby raising vital funds to keep her flying. Whilst these funds are welcome, I don't think they bring in anywhere near what they actually cost to produce/buy.

ETA: There's some speculation as to cost breakdown for the braking parachute on this forum... http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?1312... ...but you'll have to scroll down more than half way to get the figures.


Edited by yellowjack on Monday 12th January 22:44

Total loss

2,138 posts

228 months

Monday 12th January 2015
quotequote all
yellowjack said:
Total loss said:
yellowjack said:



but the intention had been to hold her at a high angle to the wind, in order to save the cost of deploying the parachute,
What cost is there deploying the shute , is it not just folded up & put back in the tail ?
How reliable the info I've found is, I don't know...

in 2013 the Bournemouth Daily Echo said:
Even her 60-foot brake parachute – used to splendid effect when she lands at Bournemouth International – costs £1,000 a pop because it has to be painstakingly re-folded by hand.
http://m.bournemouthecho.co.uk/news/10642279.Vulca...meet_the_couple_helping_to_keep_the_much_loved_aircraft_in_the_skies/?ref=mac
in 2010 the Daily Mail said:
In addition, all 33 onboard fire extinguishers have to be upgraded at a cost of £33,000, and the brake parachutes need to be replaced at a cost of £54,000.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1243857/Wo...
The braking parachute is a flight safety critical item. The old bird can't go up without it. And it's a 'lifed' item too, so it has to be replaced when it's timed operational life is up.

The old bits they take off '558 are often sold, auctioned, or raffled, if they cannot be refurbished or 're-lifed', thereby raising vital funds to keep her flying. Whilst these funds are welcome, I don't think they bring in anywhere near what they actually cost to produce/buy.

ETA: There's some speculation as to cost breakdown for the braking parachute on this forum... http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?1312... ...but you'll have to scroll down more than half way to get the figures.
Thanks, lifed to 30 deployments, £30k new = £1k per deployment

lloyd h

1,559 posts

174 months

Tuesday 13th January 2015
quotequote all
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED