Post amazingly cool pictures of aircraft (Volume 2)

Post amazingly cool pictures of aircraft (Volume 2)

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

SystemParanoia

14,343 posts

199 months

Monday 13th March 2017
quotequote all
MartG said:
LotusOmega375D said:
Is the flying boom system constrained to servicing only one aircraft at a time though?
Yes - it can't be used by the 'buddy' system either
Can the boom do helicopters ?


Z06George

2,519 posts

190 months

Monday 13th March 2017
quotequote all
Awesome, I love Super Stallions!

tuffer

8,850 posts

268 months

Monday 13th March 2017
quotequote all
SystemParanoia said:
Can the boom do helicopters ?

Did you happen to see that on Twitter?

Ginetta G15 Girl

3,220 posts

185 months

Monday 13th March 2017
quotequote all
SystemParanoia said:
Can the boom do helicopters ?
Boom equipped tankers can be fitted with a short hose and drogue which is attatched to the boom to allow probe equipped a/c to tank. Given the short length of the hose in this set up it makes for rather a 'hard' contact.

I wouldn't have thought that the short length of the hose would allow for sufficient rotor clearance for a helicopter.

Edited by Ginetta G15 Girl on Monday 13th March 16:24

mko9

2,372 posts

213 months

Monday 13th March 2017
quotequote all
SystemParanoia said:
Can the boom do helicopters ?

No, the rotor blades would cut right through the boom. Or the boom would snap the rotor blades off. Whichever. They also need a much slower aircraft than a KC-135 / KC-10, hence the use of a C-130 variant in the pic.

FourWheelDrift

88,547 posts

285 months

Monday 13th March 2017
quotequote all
Not just the boom from the tanker when it comes to choppers - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VAdpKpppZiA

Can be tricky for many - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QiN9M0ahfmM

Edited by FourWheelDrift on Monday 13th March 16:35

Stickyfinger

8,429 posts

106 months

Tuesday 14th March 2017
quotequote all

FourWheelDrift

88,547 posts

285 months

Thursday 16th March 2017
quotequote all
This is Douglas DC-8-43, N9604Z shown in later colours of Canadian Pacific Airlines, re-registered CF-CPG.

Just a normal DC-8-43 powered by Rolls-Royce Conway engines. But this one was the first commercial airliner to break the sound barrier when flown to mach 1.012 and maintaining it for 16s in a shallow dive on the 21st of August 1961.

http://www.airspacemag.com/history-of-flight/i-was...


AlexC1981

4,926 posts

218 months

Thursday 16th March 2017
quotequote all
It's a jet fighter flying boat wobble



yellowjack

17,080 posts

167 months

Friday 17th March 2017
quotequote all
AlexC1981 said:
It's a jet fighter flying boat wobble

Saunders-Roe SR.A/1. Not a terrible idea, it was conceived as an alternative to carriers in the Pacific theatre. It would have greatly outperformed the Japanese seaplane fighters of the time, but sadly it was just about made obsolete before it first flew in 1947.

I think it was dismissed as a real prospect quite early in it's short life, although the idea was revived for the Korean war, albeit briefly. Too heavy, too bulky, and the engine manufacturer had dropped out of engine development. It would almost certainly have been ineffective against streamlined and efficient carrier and land-based fighters. It was meant to be armed with 4 x 20mm cannon, with provision for 2 x 1,000lb bombs or rockets eventually. The cannon were never fitted, and the design didn't make it to the weapons testing phase of development.

One left from three prototypes, in Southampton. I saw it a few years back at "Solent Sky" museum when it was called "Southampton Hall of Aviation". The other two airframes were lost during testing and development. Eric 'Winkle' Brown nearly lost his life when he hit a submerged obstruction on landing and ended up upside down in the water. Squadron Leader ‘Pete’ Major was killed preparing for an airshow, and I think that was put down to pilot error.

Eric Mc

122,043 posts

266 months

Friday 17th March 2017
quotequote all
The Americans tried this concept -






MartG

20,685 posts

205 months

Saturday 18th March 2017
quotequote all
How's this for a 'hard' landing ?



Temporary wooden wheel fitted to a P-51 Mustang at NAA's Inglewood factory. Due to shortages of rubber the proper wheels were only fitted when the aircraft was ready for flight.

Love the 'Do not inflate' stencil biggrin

Ayahuasca

27,427 posts

280 months

Sunday 19th March 2017
quotequote all



Not a pic of an aircraft, but a very cool pic of a group of US pilots.

Glider pilots being taken back to England after landing their machines on D-Day. Many would be in action again during Market-Garden three months later.

Surprised they are smoking - don't they know it is dangerous for their health?




.


FourWheelDrift

88,547 posts

285 months

Sunday 19th March 2017
quotequote all
Endeavour over LA. September 2012.


Eric Mc

122,043 posts

266 months

Sunday 19th March 2017
quotequote all
Arriving for preservation.

tight5

2,747 posts

160 months

Sunday 19th March 2017
quotequote all


B-36 flight engineers office.

AlexC1981

4,926 posts

218 months

Sunday 19th March 2017
quotequote all
Something new to me. Unducted fan / propfan engines. They look a bit alien.




Ayahuasca

27,427 posts

280 months

Sunday 19th March 2017
quotequote all
AlexC1981 said:
Something new to me. Unducted fan / propfan engines. They look a bit alien.



You could put the propeller at the other end and call it a turboprop.

Dr Jekyll

23,820 posts

262 months

Sunday 19th March 2017
quotequote all
AlexC1981 said:
Something new to me. Unducted fan / propfan engines. They look a bit alien.



Remember seeing one at Farnborough in the late 70s early 80s, supposed to be economical or something.

FourWheelDrift

88,547 posts

285 months

Sunday 19th March 2017
quotequote all
Ayahuasca said:
You could put the propeller at the other end and call it a turboprop.
the Antonov AN-70 is a propfan with the blades at the front - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1d4rVyoStTo listen to the flyby at 1m50s
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED