How about amazingly cool pictures of hovercraft?

How about amazingly cool pictures of hovercraft?

Author
Discussion

Castrol Craig

18,073 posts

207 months

Friday 1st October 2010
quotequote all
Sixpackpert said:
Hoverbarge being towed by a heli!

without doubt, 100% 'shop

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

205 months

Friday 1st October 2010
quotequote all
Castrol Craig said:
Sixpackpert said:
Hoverbarge being towed by a heli!

without doubt, 100% 'shop
I bet it isn't

ninja-lewis

4,242 posts

191 months

Friday 1st October 2010
quotequote all
thinfourth2 said:
Castrol Craig said:
Sixpackpert said:
Hoverbarge being towed by a heli!

without doubt, 100% 'shop
I bet it isn't
said:
In June 1982, Columbia Helicopters was hired by Sohio to participate in a test on Alaska's North Slope. The purpose of this test was to evaluate the ability of a helicopter - the Boeing Vertol 107-II - to tow a fully-loaded hover barge over water, snow and ice.
The test began in Prudhoe Bay on June 17. The Vertol's 600-foot long line was connected to hover barge ACT-100, jointly owned by Global Marine Development and VECO. Air blowers on the 170-ton barge forced a cushion of air under the barge, which was kept in place by rubberized skirt material. This first test was run around Prudhoe Bay with an empty barge, and was successful. During this and subsequent tests, the aircraft often flew with a nose-down angle approaching 25 degrees.

Next, ACT-100 was loaded with 40 tons of cargo for another close-in test run. Once more, the helicopter showed it could move the barge despite the additional weight.
The final aspect of the test was to tow the hover barge over a 50-mile course to a drill site named Alaska Island where Sohio had just completed an oil well.
During the tow to the island, headwinds over 30 knots were encountered, and snow and ice buildup were also factors. Regardless, the Vertol was able to bring the empty barge to the island successfully.

On the return trip to Prudhoe Bay, when this photo was taken, the barge carried 50 tons of cargo, bringing the total weight to 220 tons. As with the previous tests, this task was accomplished successfully.

This photograph is one of longtime Columbia Helicopters' photographer Ted Veal's most famous photographs. The use of a powerful telephoto lens makes it appear as though the helicopter is closer to the ice than is actually the case.

Sixpackpert

4,561 posts

215 months

Friday 1st October 2010
quotequote all
Huntsman said:
Sixpackpert said:
I believe they could operate upto sea state 9!
9 is a Beaufort scale wind force, not a sea state.

Calm? Slight? Moderate? Rough? Very rough?
Yep sorry, can't find the info to hand. The craft were allowed to operate in 3.5 metre waves.

Thunderace

759 posts

246 months

Saturday 2nd October 2010
quotequote all
A couple from Southsea.




foilist

101 posts

169 months

Sunday 3rd October 2010
quotequote all
The (4 year old) wee man got a bizarre toy hovercraft in his cereal this morning- which led to YouTube to show/ explain to him what a hovercraft is.... he got quite upset and the bottom lip started trembling when he realised he couldn't travel in the SRN4 as it's stopped... luckily a full wobbler was averted when a quick google revealed the Isle of Wight passenger hovercraft is still running... so that's the half term trip sorted out....!!

hidetheelephants

24,442 posts

194 months

Sunday 3rd October 2010
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
I don't think it was that simple; fuel costs were an issue but also:

  • The maintenance overhead of maintaining a 30 year old riveted aluminium structure in a salty environment must have been significant.
  • Skirt maintenance is surprisingly costly.
  • Finding spares for the gasturbines and the transmission/propellors was becoming progressively harder; the Proteus went out of production in the 70s and RR(never the cheapest company to get spares from) probably weren't interested. The props were I think DeHavilland, so I guess ended up as part of BAE(another company known for charging like a wounded rhino).
I also recall some rather bitter(and unverified) discussion of Hoverspeed insisting that any purchaser of the SRN4s was not allowed to use them on the channel-crossing, although how such a condition could be legal or enforcible is beyond me. It also amazes me that one or more were not STUFT during the Falklands(especially as the Seaspeed ones were state-owned anyway); the military value of these as landing craft is equal to dozens of LCUs. After all they took half of the conventional channel ferries with them.

andy97

4,703 posts

223 months

Sunday 3rd October 2010
quotequote all
Huntsman said:
Sixpackpert said:
I believe they could operate upto sea state 9!
9 is a Beaufort scale wind force, not a sea state.

Calm? Slight? Moderate? Rough? Very rough?
Wrong I'm afraid, certainly as a Naval Officer we talked in terms of Sea State 1, 2, 3 4 etc etc.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_state

pc.iow

1,879 posts

204 months

Wednesday 27th October 2010
quotequote all
A few from Bembridge harbour.





steve j

3,223 posts

229 months