Strat or Tele

Author
Discussion

DoubleYellow

Original Poster:

1,288 posts

190 months

Thursday 18th June 2009
quotequote all
Which shape do you prefer?

Which do you prefer to play?


Just interested to hear people's opinions.

For me, I think I prefer the shape and looks of the Telecaster but prefer to play the Stratocaster simply because that is what I'm used to.

audidoody

8,597 posts

257 months

Thursday 18th June 2009
quotequote all
Tele for twang, brightness and sparkle. Strat for versatility and "quack".

uriel

3,244 posts

252 months

Thursday 18th June 2009
quotequote all
I was always a Strat fan, but over the last couple of years I have really fallen for Teles. A few months ago I bought a '52 AVRI and it's the best guitar I've ever played.

Reading the guitar forums, it seems as though there is somekind of Tele revival/fad/trend going on at the minute.

suthol

2,157 posts

235 months

Thursday 18th June 2009
quotequote all
What is it they say " Learn to play guitar and then learn to play Telecaster "

The Tele is a very satisfying guitar once you start to get around it properly particularly the standard ones with the bar pickups and simply controls.

bennyboysvuk

3,491 posts

249 months

Thursday 18th June 2009
quotequote all
I bought a USA Strat about 6 years ago. A Tele's on the list as well, but I'll have to buy a new house before the other half will agree to yet another guitar (there are 4 others too). This of course currently puts it outside of my price range. frown

bigbadbikercats

635 posts

209 months

Thursday 18th June 2009
quotequote all
Got both, love both.

My Strat (a mid '80s Japanese "Fotoflame" with Bare Knuckles "Slow Hand" pickups) gets more use because it's more versatile and more forgiving (more on this in the next paragraph) but the Tele (a deperately unfashionable early '80s US Standard with six saddle "top loader" bridge) into my old Super Champ has what's quite simply the most heart-breakingly beautiful clean tone I've ever heard and Stones stuff in Keef-style 5-string "Open G" tuning sounds absolutely spot on!

The Tele's also my practice/learning guitar of choice because its clarity, sparkle, and attack make it ruthlessly unforgiving of poor technique[1] - the Strat (and even more so the PRS Mira which is my other main guitar these days) seem to let me get away with fluffed notes, messy picking, shaky timing, sloppy muting, and inaccurate bends[2] to a far greater extent so if I learn something on the Tele and then switch to one of the others once I've got my head/fingers round what I'm trying to do it makes me feel loads more confident when I'm happy to let someone else hear it. To a certain extent I think the fact that the Tele is a challenge to get the best out of is one of the things which endears it to me, and it gives me a certain extra respect for players who can really make them work.

[1] Of which I have plenty!
[2] All of which I'm guilty of far more often than I'd like!

2volvos

660 posts

202 months

Thursday 18th June 2009
quotequote all
The Strat is a '57 Corvette, a bit flash and showoffy and the Tele is a '66 Mustang, bit more down to earth and blue collar.

I suppose that make the Les Paul a Dodge Charger...

Dai Capp

1,641 posts

261 months

Thursday 18th June 2009
quotequote all
Hi

Got both - I use my strat more as it has a better neck profile for me. Both sound different but I'd have to say the strat is more versatile for the stuff I play.

If I had to sell one it would be the tele, but I'd really miss it!

Cheers

DC

LaurenceOnSynth

135 posts

191 months

Saturday 20th June 2009
quotequote all
I have an american standard tele myself, and a good friend has an american strat, so we have the best of both worlds.
I prefer the tele myself, and my mate admits to preferring the tele too, it seems to fit my playing style and hands perfect.
I guess it always comes down to playing style and the person though.
Although a majority of good guitarists probably know when they're playing a good guitar smile

evil len

4,398 posts

270 months

Sunday 21st June 2009
quotequote all
I've got a USA Strat and love it for it's versatility.
I want a Tele at some point ... question, is the USA Tele that much better than the Mex ?

LaurenceOnSynth

135 posts

191 months

Sunday 21st June 2009
quotequote all
evil len said:
I've got a USA Strat and love it for it's versatility.
I want a Tele at some point ... question, is the USA Tele that much better than the Mex ?
Yes. Go and try a mexican at your local guitar shop and then ask to try an american standard. After that you'll never want to go back.

Dracoro

8,691 posts

246 months

Monday 22nd June 2009
quotequote all
Neither, I went for a Jazzmaster biggrin

Strats are good guitars but just such an unoriginal choice, I'm no Clapton so never really going appreciate the better-ness of a strat over anything else anyway.

Tele's are cool but I feel they should always look battered for some reason, a new shiny one just doesn't look right imo.

Funk Odyssey

1,983 posts

230 months

Monday 22nd June 2009
quotequote all
Dracoro said:
Neither, I went for a Jazzmasterbiggrin

Strats are good guitars but just such an unoriginal choice, I'm no Clapton so never really going appreciate the better-ness of a strat over anything else anyway.

Tele's are cool but I feel they should always look battered for some reason, a new shiny one just doesn't look right imo.
good choice-

which colour?

Dracoro

8,691 posts

246 months

Monday 22nd June 2009
quotequote all
Thanks, I've always loved them.

Sunburst - I was toying between that and black but since the sunburst had plenty of black in it, it won the day biggrin Oh, added to the fact that my local friendly guitar place (I get free guitar servicing for 2 years too!) had one in stock, that also helped make my mind up!



Edited by Dracoro on Monday 22 June 09:13

Funk Odyssey

1,983 posts

230 months

Monday 22nd June 2009
quotequote all
The best colour - looks exactly like mine - the only guitar I know I'll never sell. I am going to re wire the rhythm circuit though as its too woody for me

My Fender Tele FWIW is a nice little guitar -- black body, maple neck, white scratchplate - it's a heavy chunk of wood and just sounds right for some music -- quite a limited range - but that's the appeal - makes you work harder! -- seems to sound better in open g tuning too......

My Fender Strat is a nice hunk of wood -- Lake Placid blue with a rosewood fingerboard -- great in neck or bridge position and very comfy to play - I do hate the inbetween pickup poistions though -

To my ears IMHO you can't go wrong with a Tele -- they are limited (bit like a Les Paul) but that doesn't matter -- they sound great.

the Strat can make any sound you want and is very receptive to how you use your fingers -

- you can sound like an 80's jangly tosser with a strat though or you can fall into that cheesy 80's overproduced blues....

dern

14,055 posts

280 months

Monday 22nd June 2009
quotequote all
LaurenceOnSynth said:
evil len said:
I've got a USA Strat and love it for it's versatility.
I want a Tele at some point ... question, is the USA Tele that much better than the Mex ?
Yes. Go and try a mexican at your local guitar shop and then ask to try an american standard. After that you'll never want to go back.
Also try a highway one. It's supposed to have a lot of the same hardware as the american and is built in the states but has a cheaper finish so costs less than the american. The cheaper finish is a matt nitrocellulose lacquer which looks good, wears nicely (and quite quickly) and is supposed to affect the sound in a good way (hmm). Anyway, I like my highway one strat and they're worth a play and my brother's highway one tele is just as nice.

gbbird

5,186 posts

245 months

Monday 22nd June 2009
quotequote all
Strat all the way for me. I have a Fender USA strat, plus a number of superstrats by other makes.

Get Karter

1,934 posts

202 months

Tuesday 23rd June 2009
quotequote all
As practically no-one ever uses a clean guitar sound, and with all the amp-simulator gubbins that are so cheaply available to create any sound you want, why is the shape of your guitar's body of any importance other than visually?

Genuine question folks, from someone who has an acoustic guitar....





LaurenceOnSynth

135 posts

191 months

Tuesday 23rd June 2009
quotequote all
Get Karter said:
As practically no-one ever uses a clean guitar sound, and with all the amp-simulator gubbins that are so cheaply available to create any sound you want, why is the shape of your guitar's body of any importance other than visually?

Genuine question folks, from someone who has an acoustic guitar....
Depends. A hollow body electric has a much richer, smoother tone than say a solid body like a strat. When played clean obviously.

dern

14,055 posts

280 months

Tuesday 23rd June 2009
quotequote all
Get Karter said:
As practically no-one ever uses a clean guitar sound, and with all the amp-simulator gubbins that are so cheaply available to create any sound you want, why is the shape of your guitar's body of any importance other than visually?

Genuine question folks, from someone who has an acoustic guitar....
The sound of the guitar will colour whatever sound you get regardless of what processing you do further down the line.