|
M3
2,132 posts
124 months
|
|
|
DiscoColin
2,271 posts
84 months
|
Significantly fewer than last year, but yes, I have quite a few. Given the way that the girls routinely get quite unreasonably (MHO) derided on here I am in a couple of minds as to whether to post any though 
|
|
|
M3
2,132 posts
124 months
|
Cant see a thong there!!!
|
|
|
Jag-D
19,574 posts
89 months
|
|
|
M3
2,132 posts
124 months
|
Jag...was your camera hidden sideways in your pocket?
By the way some good 911s in your fantasy garage...and CSL
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
Jag-D
19,574 posts
89 months
|
 nah it was a combination of my style plus the fact that so many pervs with pointy clicky cameras were taking up the space so I had to smudge in!  Cheers, do have a big thing for 911s at the moment 
|
|
|
DiscoColin
2,271 posts
84 months
|
|
|
Andy1973
7 posts
54 months
|
The variety definately was not there this year - only a handful of models. Does anyone have anymore pics?
|
|
|
B3ndy
46 posts
53 months
|
The Blonde twins on the WD40 stand were quite cute I thought?!
|
|
|
b8ste
45 posts
57 months
|
|
|
doesnt post much
1,277 posts
57 months
|
Well! I'll not be buying Lucas Oils if that's the best they can do! 
|
|
|
Andy1973
7 posts
54 months
|
Did anyone get a picture of the gorgeous girl that was opposite the Dunlop stand - they were promtting trailers and motorhomes. Talk about stunning in her skin tight wetlook leggings - OMG. What a backside.
|
|
|
KO993c4s
104 posts
42 months
|
Maybe I have low standards but I wouldnt say any of the models whose pics have appeared so far can be described as ROPEY...!!
|
|
|
Lost soul
5,246 posts
52 months
|
There are a few nice lookers there but in general what a load of minging munters
|
|
|
tuffer
5,226 posts
137 months
|
KO993c4s said: Maybe I have low standards but I wouldnt say any of the models whose pics have appeared so far can be described as ROPEY...!! Your kidding right? I was never very fussy but some of these look decidedly dodgy.
|
|
|
tuffer
5,226 posts
137 months
|
Apart from the obvious assets of the one on the right, she is rather rough and that is putting it mildly: 
|
|
|
KO993c4s
104 posts
42 months
|
tuffer said: Your kidding right? I was never very fussy but some of these look decidedly dodgy. Hehehe... I guess it depends on your budget allocation for promo girls... The LUCAS OIL girls do look a bit err... ropey...!
|
|
|
DiscoColin
2,271 posts
84 months
|
B3ndy said: The Blonde twins on the WD40 stand were quite cute I thought?! I am inclined to agree - definitely cute, nicely appealing to my eye and certainly in a high percentile of the population. [I do requests where possible] 
|
|
|
DiscoColin
2,271 posts
84 months
|
KO993c4s said: Hehehe... I guess it depends on your budget allocation for promo girls... The LUCAS OIL girls do look a bit err... ropey...! Some of the pictures are somewhat unflattering, but they were pleasant to chat to, nice to look at in person and in possession of the kind of cleavage that you simply cannot argue with. Well, for those of us that do not judge a person by the ability of the person pointing a camera at them anyway 
|
|
|
Lost soul
5,246 posts
52 months
|
|
